Friday, March 30, 2007

WE DON'T FORGET


“If I could be anything in the world I would want to be a teardrop because I would be born in your eyes, live on your cheeks, and die on your lips.”

~ Unknown.






Enes Ata, age 8, murdered by the Turkish state on March 30, 2006 as he walked to his aunt's home in Amed.


From the Turkish Human Rights Association report:


Mehmet Akbulut (18): "He was heavily wounded as result of injury by firearm when security forces opened fire in the centre of the province on 28 March 2006. He lost his life on 31.03.2006 at the Dicle University Faculty of Medicine where he was being treated. According to the autopsy report, his death was result of liver damage, internal haemorrhage and shock due to haemorrhage, related to injury by firearm bullet."

Halit Sogut (78): "Halit Sogut, who was heavily injured due to a blow delivered to his head by security forces with a hard object at around 14.30 on 28 March 2006, lost his life on 2 April 2006 at the State Hospital where he was placed under treatment."

Tarik Ataykaya (22): "Furniture worker. On 29 March 2006 between 13:30 and 14:00 he was wounded when security forces opened fire near Hayat 2 apartment on Baglar Medine Boulevard (beside the Metin Furniture facility behind the Rice Factory) and died the same day at the State hospital. According to the autopsy report, he died as result of brain damage and haemorrhage related to injury by firearm bullet (gas cartridge).

A section of what witnesses told IHD: " Security forces wearing Special Team uniforms and carrying firearms appeared across us. They numbered about 6-7. They were haphazardly shooting. They were kneeling on the ground and aiming at the crowd; they were not firing into the air. At that moment there was a big commotion. Everyone started to run away. While we ran off scared, I heard a gunshot behind me. When I turned to look, I saw Tarik on the ground and went to him. Tarik had lost consciousness at that point. (...) We took Tarik into the building right beside us. We rang the door of one of the flats there and told them to phone for an ambulance. While we were inside the building we washed his face and at that time we realised he had received a blow to his head.

Mehmet Isikci (19): "Furniture builder. He was taken to the State Hospital after receiving a concussion from a blow with a hard object used by security forces on Emek High Street at around 17:30-18.00 on 29.03.2006 and died there shortly after. Those who witnessed the incident were relatives living in the building opposite to where the incident took place. According to the autopsy report, he died as result of head, chest and inner trauma, fracture of skull, brain hemorrhage, internal hemorrhage due to right lung and liver rupture and shock from hemorrhage."

Abdullah Duran (9): "Elementary school student. Abdullah Duran lost his life as result of security forces opening fire at around 17:30 on 29.03.2006 while, together with his family, he was watching the incidents in the streets from the balcony of the house they lived in. His uncle Mehmet Duran has stated that bullets had also passed through the jacket his other nephew Eyup Duran was wearing while on the balcony. According to the autopsy report, he died as result of internal hemorrhage and hemorrhage shock related to injuries of the heart and both lungs by firearm bullet."

Enez Ata (8): "Elementary school student. He lost his life as result of being hit by a bullet when security forces opened fire again in Kurucesme district during the incidents that erupted on 30 March 2006 while the funeral ceremony of 3 civilian citizens whose rights to life was violated by security forces on 28 and 29 March was being held."

From Enez Ata's father's account: "At around mid-day on 30 March 2006, my son Enez Ata came home earlier than usual saying they did not allow them entry into the school. It was around 13:20. After taking off his uniform apron, he said he would go to his aunt who lives very close to our house and left the house. As I thought he had gone to his aunt, I was initially at ease. Later, at about 15.00, I phoned his aunt. But she told me Enez had not gone there. Upon this our family started to look for him, we went to our relatives, we went to the school. But the school was totally empty. After looking for him for several hours I returned home where I received a phone call from my aunt who said some people had seen Enez wounded and in someone's lap on the television. Whereon I went to the Children's Hospital Emergency Service but he was not there. After that I went to the State Hospital. When I saw the dead body of my son at the Emergency Service, I lost myself. The prosecutor who arrived for the autopsy showed me the bullet that had lodged in his body (between his heart and stomach). I recall they forced me into a car; the police sent us to the Cinar district Asagikonak Village where our birth registry is held; they did not allow us to bury my son in the cemetery in Diyarbakir."

Mahsun Mizrak (17):"PVC foreman, glazier. Although witnesses have seen him being detained on 30.03.2006 by the 10 Nisan Police Station, his family received no result from applications made to the police stations, bar association, IHD, Security Directorates and hospitals. Finally, on 03.04.2006 at 18:00 the family went to the State Hospital and learned that his body had been held at the morgue since 30.03.2006 as an unidentified corpse. According to the autopsy report, he died as result of brain damage and haemorrhage caused by firearm bullet (gas cartridge)."

Emrah Fidan (17): "High school 3rd grade student. As result of injury due to security forces opening fire in the provincial center on the afternoon of 29.03.2006, he was placed under treatment at the intensive care unit of the Dicle University Faculty of Medicine and lost his life at around 08:00 on 03.04.2006. According to the autopsy report, he died as result of firearm pellets and brain hemorrhage."

From Emrah Fidan's father's account: "My son Emrah Fidan left the house at around 15:00 on 29.03.2006 and when he did not come back home towards the evening we got concerned. Because of this we went to the hospitals and asked. At the State Hospital Emergency Service they showed me a document in which the name 'Emrah Fidan' was written. We looked into the rooms with the nurses but could not find him. Upon this we went to the police stations and asked. I went to the Security Directorate to ask and a policeman there shouted at me saying '.... off and ask Osman Baydemir about your son!.." and threw me out. That night I couldn't find a trace of my son anywhere. The next day I went back to the State Hospital. The police there told me that my son had been lightly injured in the foot. On 30.03.2006 we went to the D.U. Faculty of Medicine and asked. They first showed us his clothes.; he had his identification document in the back pocket of his trousers; despite this he was entered in hospital records as Nursin Dogansahin. He remained in intensive care and at about 08:00 on the morning of 03.04.2006 he lost his life.

Ismail Erkek (8): "Elementary school student. He lost his life as result of being hit by a bullet when security forces opened fire again in Kurucesme district during the incidents that erupted on 30 March 2006 while the funeral ceremony of 3 civilian citizens whose rights to life was violated by security forces on 28 and 29 March was being held."

Mustafa Eryilmaz (26): "As result of security forces using disproportionate and excessive force and using firearms on 29 March 2006 he was heavily wounded after which on 31 March 2006 he lost his life. Because his family was not allowed to bury the body in Diyarbakir, it was buried in Silvan."


From YEK-KOM (scroll down):


Responding to the recent events, Erdogan issued a statement in which there was not a single word lost about the murdered children and adolescents. The police and military forces responsible for the murders do not have to fear any legal or disciplinary consequences. On the contrary, the Turkish minister president said the following: "Our security forces will use the necessary force and intervene against anybody who agrees to be a tool of terror, including children and women. I want this to be clearly understood.‚ This statement amounts to a licence to kill, the green light for more massacres on the Kurdish civilian population. According to Erdogan's reasoning, murdering children is part of necessary intervention by the state in agreement with Turkish political authorities. With his words and actions Erdogan makes himself personally and politically fully responsible for the massacres of Kurdish civilians.


To date, no prosecutions have been brought against any official of the Turkish state for the crimes committed against the Kurdish people during the Amed Serhildan.

We don't forget.

Thursday, March 29, 2007

ONE YEAR AGO

"One faces the future with one's past."
~ Pearl S. Buck.


One year ago, at the end of March 2006, began the Amed Serhildan. After attending the funerals of four HPG gerîlas buried in Amed--out of 14 killed by chemical weapons utilized by the Turkish state--the state began provocations against the crowd of mourners. The serhildan quickly spread throughout Turkish-occupied Kurdistan, "including Batman, Siirt, Mardin, Kiziltepe, Nusaybin, Hakkari, Agri, Van, Ergani, Kars," and even to the large Kurdish population of Istanbul.

Fatih Tas reported the events:


The clashes started with the killing of 14 HPG (People’s Defensive Forces of Kurdish Liberation Movement (KLM)) guerrilla fighters. The HPG claimed that chemical weapons had been used against the guerrillas and demanded that NGOs should investigate the incidence. The families of the guerrillas said that they saw burns and other signs of chemical weapons on their corpses. This information triggered large-scale demonstrations in Diyarbakir during the funeral. The police attacked the funeral using firearms. The demonstrations to protest the attack and the use of chemical weapons spread to other cities. During the demonstrations 13 people, including three children aged three to six, were killed by bullets and several people were hospitalised. Hundreds were arrested and tortured.

[ . . . ]

The mainstream media were in harmony with the government and gave full support to the state policy of demonising the Kurdish people. The broken glass of some shops was the main issue on mainstream TV channels while people were losing their lives to the bullets fired by security forces. The mainstream media was actually provoking an ethnic civil war.

By 12th of Apri, 18 guerrillas, 34 soldiers and 1 policeman had lost their lives. The Turkish state tried every possible means to “solve” the Kurdish problem, the origins of which can be dated back to 1978: dirty war, paramilitary forces, death squads, forced evictions, torture, economic sanctions, summary executions, chemical weapons etc. There is only one approach which has not yet been tried: peaceful dialog. The key to peaceful dialog is the model tried in South Africa: “Truth and Reconciliation Commissions”. That model is proposed by the leader of the KLM, Abdullah Öcalan and it seems to be the only possible way to uncover the human rights violations for which both parties are responsible and to heal the suffering from the prolonged civil war.

As of 20th April 250,000 Turkish troops are said will be deployed in southeastern Kurdish region of Turkey to organize operations against Kurdish guerillas and according to mainstream media the operation could include a cross-border attack to the Northern Iraq where there are guerilla bases.


Those forces are still deployed in Turkish-occupied Kurdistan and the Ankara regime still threatens an invasion of South Kurdistan.

What follows are the fourth and fifth appendices to the "Report on Local Government and Local Democracy Dynamics concerning the DTP Municipalities in Turkey," specifically in reference to the Amed Serhildan. All emphasis is in the original translation.

**********


The original speech transcriptions submitted as evidence by the Public Prosecutor in the Indictment (literally transcribed)


Transcription of the CD of the Kurdish and Turkish speeches of the mayor of Diyarbakir Metropolitan Municipality Osman Baydemir to the Crowd in the Baglar District on the 29th and 30th of March, 2006

02: 28 minute of the CD-- BAYDEMIR (Speaking in Turkish): Friends! The pain that our city went through is very big. We are aware of this. The mayors, our province organization (meaning the Democratic Society Party-DTP), our province chair (of the DTP), our executives, friends, all of us! We share your pain deep in heart. From now on, from this minute on, the continuation of tension will harm our people, our city. That is why we demand you please disperse and go back to your home from now on. Please you all go back to your homes. All security forces will retreat to their stations. And all our people will go back to their homes easily and safely. Any activity you will involve in from now on will harm our city, your demands for democracy and freedom.

03: 26 minute of the CD—A person who is not seen on the screen is speaking in Turkish: My Mayor, everybody wants them to retreat, driving the panzers fast towards the citizens…

03: 31 minute of the CD--BAYDEMIR (Speaking in Turkish): We had the necessary meetings. We had the necessary meetings. We talked with the Governorship, with other institutions, we talked with the Vice Governor, there will be no intervention in any sense, we received guarantee. No intervention will happen. My request from you is that please go back to your homes in a peaceful way, thank you.

03: 31 minute of the CD—BAYDEMIR (Speaking in Kurdish): Friends, friends, kids do not come with us; go back to your homes. Listen to me, our heart pain was 14, today it became 17. No more, let not it be 18. Let not it be 18. I beg you please go back to your homes, go back, go back.

04: 42 minute of the CD—Slogan Shouted by the Crowd: Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Revenge, revenge, revenge, revenge, revenge, revenge, revenge, revenge, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo.

05: 49 minute of the CD--BAYDEMIR (Speaking in Kurdish): Friends, please be quiet. Please be quiet and listen to me, friends please listen to me, I beg from you. I beg from you, please sit down, please sit down and be quiet, be quiet, be quiet, be quiet, be quiet, friends.

06: 27 minute of the CD—The mayor of Diyarbakir Metropolitan Municipality Osman Baydemir is talking to the crowd under a piece of garment named as the flag of the so-called confederalism, the flag being tied to the edge of a wooden stick, as seen on the upper-left corner of the screen.

06: 30 minute of the CD –Slogan Shouted by the Crowd: Teeth to Teeth, Blood to Blood, We are with you OCALAN!

06: 38 minute of the CD-- BAYDEMIR (Speaking in Kurdish): Friends, please listen to me for two minutes, please listen for two minutes. If we do not listen to each other, we will not have progress. Please…Today we had a meeting with all our civil society organizations, our party, our mayors. We very much thank you for your demands and courage so far.

07: 20 minute of the CD—Slogan Shouted by the Crowd: Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo.

07: 26 minute of the CD-- BAYDEMIR (Speaking in Kurdish): You claimed your identity; you claimed your people with burnt hearts, and your pain. We are also with you. Be sure of this. For the priority of peace, for the priority of your success, we have to listen to each other under the leadership of the Party. We fear that this mobilization from now on will harm our nation and our people. From now on, we all will go back to our home quietly. We had a meeting with them. According to our talks, nobody will intervene into the people. Nobody will intervene.

08: 42 minute of the CD—Slogan Shouted by the Crowd: Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Revenge, revenge, revenge, revenge, revenge, revenge, revenge, revenge, revenge, revenge. Regards, regards, A thousand Regards to Imrali, Regards, Regards, A thousand Regards to Imrali, Regards, Regards, A thousand Regards to Imrali, Regards, Regards, A thousand Regards to Imrali, Regards, Regards, A thousand Regards to Imrali.


Transcription of the Turkish-Kurdish Speech of Osman Baydemir to the Crowd who Gathered in the Yenikoy Cemetery on 30th March, 2006.

00: 02 minute of the CD-- Slogan Shouted by the Crowd: Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo.

00: 17 minute of the CD—Slogan Shouted by the Crown in Turkish: Each and every Kurd is born as a guerilla, Each and every Kurd is born as a guerilla, Each and every Kurd is born as a guerilla, Each and every Kurd is born as a guerilla, Each and every Kurd is born as a guerilla, Each and every Kurd is born as a guerilla.

01: 01 minute of the CD-- Slogan Shouted by the Crowd: Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo.

02: 02 minute of the CD— The bus owned by the DTP is moving with the crowd. The 10 Nisan Police Station is attacked heavily with stones,

02: 15 minute of the CD-- Shouted by the Crowd: Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo, Long Live President Apo.

02: 25 minute of the CD—Slogan Shouted by the Crowd: Martyrs do not die, Martyrs do not die, Martyrs do not die, Martyrs do not die,

02: 32 minute of the CD—Osman BAYDEMIR (Speaking in Kurdish): Please wait for a moment. First of all, I bend respectfully in front of my friends. The night is evident to the owner of the daytime. My people have gone through great suffering for the last 3 days. We have to take this problem to the very end. Because of this we have to listen to our friends with avidity, with reason, with brain. We have to know each other’s thoughts. You should know well, all the world should know well, the people of Diyarbakir should know well. The wish of my heart, the wish in my heart is: “IF ONLY I WOULD BE IN THEIR PLACE. IF ONLY THEY HAD NOT DIED TODAY”. Friends, my dear people, my honorable people, we have to listen to each other. The wish of my heart, of the friends and allies around me, is only if the poison in the bomb would come into my eyes, not into those of my people. I wish no stone would touch your nails, but they come to my head.

04: 28 minute of the CD: Slogan shouted by the Crowd: Revenge, revenge, revenge, revenge, revenge, revenge,

That is why friends, brothers and sisters, my brothers and sisters. We are with you in all hardships. We are with you with all my friends and allies. We know that you, we know that you no matter… (not understood). The pain of our people, of our city is very big from this day on… (not understood). According to our beliefs, our point of view, in our religion there is mourning for 3 days. (A short interruption happened here.) Let’s share the pain of our families in this three-day mourning. They should also know that this pain is not their pain alone; this pain belongs to all the people.



29.03. 2006—Press Release by Mr. Osman Baydemir

Dear Press Members,

Dear People of Diyarbakir,

The incidents that has taken place in the region during the last week and in our city for the last two days reached to a point that would seriously harm both the future of democracy and the will and demand of our people to live together. The city is tense, and worries are high. In the current situation, a democratic and prudent approach is what we need urgently more than ever before.

We believe that all of these stem from the inability to find a sustainable and peaceful solution for the Kurdish problem. Unfortunately, the current oppressive approaches heavily marked with a security perspective are drawing the chance for democratization and peaceful solution of the Kurdish problem into a big politics of solution-less-ness. Many people were injured by fire-arms, and, as of now, two people lost their lives because of the intervention of security forces into the protests. There are some injured who still have death risk. Again, many offices, shops and public areas were destroyed. First and foremost the government, all should approach to the problem in a civilian and prudent manner, and take responsibility urgently in this regard.

It is necessary to carry out an inclusive, widespread and civilian democratic struggle against this politics of solution-less-ness that we are exposed to. However, the methods to be used in raising demands for democratic rights and freedoms and in struggling to frustrate the increasing oppressive wave should also be democratic. Each and every activity to be carried out in this regard should have the quality to contribute to the democratic and peaceful solution of the problems.

As the city our pain is big, and we are face in face with risks that may increase this pain every passing second. We understand the worries of our people and share their pain and suffering. In the current situation, we invite once again everybody to act with prudence and steadiness and contribute to the normalization of life in order to prevent further pain and destruction.

**********


One year later and the repression has only intensified while those who feed the monster of Turkish fascism continue to do so with impunity. The only democracy in Turkey--perhaps the only democracy in the Middle East--exists among those like the DTP politicians and the individuals at the local level who work with them and stand fast with them, and with those who are real Turkish heroes, as Vahe Balabanian has posted at Hyelog.

The Ankara regime itself, all of its institutions, and all of its foreign backers are the enemies of democratization in the Middle East. I've said it before and I'll say it again: No more cooperation.

Wednesday, March 28, 2007

DEMOCRACY, DTP, AND MULTILINGUALISM

"As long as the differences and diversities of mankind exist, democracy must allow for compromise, for accommodation, and for the recognition of differences."
~ Eugene McCarthy.


The following is a translated copy of the speech that DTP Mayor Abdullah Demirbas gave at the European Social Forum in January 2006, and for which a charge was filed against him in Turkey for "making propoganda to promote the aims of the terrorist organization PKK." It comprises Appendix 1 of the "Report on Local Government and Local Democracy Dynamics concerning the DTP Municipalities in Turkey."

Mayor Demirbas was subsequently acquitted of all charges in September 2006, but the fact that such a charge was brought against a Kurdish and DTP mayor is indicative of the harassment these mayors face from the Ankara regime.



Municipal Services and Local Governments in the Light of Multilingualism

By Abdullah DEMİRBAS, Mayor, Sur Municipality
Diyarbakir, 2005


1. Democracy and Multiculturalism

There is a widespread consensus that social life and forms of human thought have been undergoing a fundamental process of change and transformation. All the values of the project of modernity, which has developed since the 18th century, have been scrutinized; many components of modern life, ranging from the Enlightenment philosophy to traditional positivism, have been exposed to severe criticism. The boundaries of the nation-states, the emblematic outcomes of the French Revolution, have been blurred in the face of contemporary human realities. There is an ongoing process of transition from industrial to “information societies”. These fundamental transformations have repercussions in the institutional and political realms of human life. The importance of democracy is being re-surfaced within the framework of such transformations. Indeed, democracy has been proving itself to be the most proper and realistic system that can reflect and represent social realities in the political field.

The current debates carried out on the concept of democracy are not to suggest different ideas and practices in its stead. Rather, they aim to contribute to its effectiveness in order to make it function in a much better and satisfying way. Of course, the criticisms of democracy should not be carried out at a superficial and eclectical plane of discussion; the debates should involve a deeper scrutiny. The democratic theory has proved its reliability and feasibility by taking different forms to adapt to changing historical conditions. It should be noted right here that the democratic theory does not point to an already complete situation, rather, it is an ongoing process. This idea invalidates the claims that this or that country is proper for democracy. Rather, it backs the argument that a country improves and becomes proper through democracy.

Grounded in the idea that a people should have a determining influence on the political power, democracy is a system in which citizens could participate fully and effectively in the decision making processes that affect them, and this participation, at all levels, should be realized by means of a well functioning decentralization. It is important to note at this point the dependence of democracy on local governments. The citizens, who do not have an influence on the central government except for the election time, can express themselves through local governments. This argument also acknowledges that local governments are also a “democracy school”. The most important feature of democracy is its ability to enable the citizens become “active agents” in the process of meeting their needs at the local level. The most important element in the relation between local government and democracy is local cultures.

Taking culture as a set values and preferences meaningful to a people, a frame that offers a form of life to them, the harmoniousness of local democracy and culture appears as a must. This harmony is possible to the extent that all elements of a culture, which is a totality of normative values, principles and ideals, can express and maintain themselves within a democratic life.

In the process of the formation of nation-states, it was assumed that all cultures have a similar essence. Creating the illusion that internally homogenous societies exist, such an understanding has brought about the denial of different cultures that are located within territories of the nation-states. Authoritarian modern regimes have been inspired by this very illusion of homogeneity. However, today there is a trend that defends the local in its relation to the central authority, and, relationally, heterogeneity against homogeneity. Fed up by the dynamics of local cultures, local governments have a more democratic nature than the central authorities. In this regard, we have to note the significance of multiculturalism, which, relying on the idea of “unity in diversity”, foregrounds three fundamental principles.

1. People cannot be thought of independent of their cultures, since individuals produce and live with specific meanings, values and symbols in their interaction with social environment.

2. Differences are not a mistake. Each and every culture is “unique” and “valuable”.

3. As a part of a pluralistic structure, each and every culture can contribute to an understanding of democracy that does not exclude or discriminate against "the other”.

Confounding the monolithic and homogenizing cultural formations, multiculturalism both acknowledges and supports diversity. Enabling a rich democratic opening, this principle contributes to the flourishing of a citizen-centered democratic life. To attempt solely at creating democratic openings at the level of the central authority may result in a system that is still alien to local cultures. However, to defend and support the local may help to put into practice the principle of “unity in diversity” by foregrounding and realizing a free and citizen-centered approach.

2. Cultures and Language

Living in specific cultural contexts, human beings think and express what they think through the medium of language. In this sense, language is the main symbol of human life. Besides, it is only through language that other symbolic systems of human life can be interpreted. Any object which cannot be expressed in language is not able to have a meaning. Language is a human creation, and a historical phenomenon, in the exact sense of the words. It relies on a process of becoming, including all the meanings of human thought and practices. The boundaries of a people’s world of meanings are at the same time the boundaries of the language they speak. Language is not a simple means of communication; on the contrary, it involves all the meanings of human existence. It is definitely not possible to talk about human life beyond and without language.

Delivering services from a citizen-centered approach, local governments should be aware of the fact that the language a people use forms at the same time the spiritual world of those people. Language cannot be relegated to a simple medium of thought and communication between the people and governments. Language is what exists; it cannot be accepted as if it does not exist. Language, as a system of specific sounds, words or signs in order for people to express, in written or oral forms, their ideas, feelings, expectations and imaginations, is an active being living and developing according to principles unique to itself; and, as such, it is one of the most important components of any cultural formation. That is why most contemporary democratic societies have reflected their sensitivity to the issue of language on governmental systems in both theoretical and practical senses.

3. Conclusion and Suggestions

The monolithic logic of the nation-state has ignored the fact of cultural diversity in the process of the formation of the nation-states. In order to form a national unity, nation-states have aimed to produce a nation-form that aimed to secure some homogeneity with regard to linguistic, religious, sectarian, etc. differences that were sources of cultural diversity. This has led to the formation of a dominant and core cultural group within each territorially bound nation- state and the subjection of other cultures to this dominant group accordingly. With its current monolithic structure, however, the nation state is not able to keep together, in harmony and equality, the different forms of life within its territories.

Turkey has accepted a policy (Every one living within its borders is Turkish!) that intends to homogenize all peoples within its territories for years. Contradicting with the principle of multiculturalism, this policy has amounted to a despotic understanding aiming at denial and assimilation of cultural difference. However, cultural diversity could pave the way to refuse approaches relying on violence and conflict by opening space for intercultural dialogue and social peace. Since the declaration of the Turkish Republic and best concretized in the “Turkish History Thesis” and “Sun-Language Theory”, the approach that denies cultural difference has been the main frame of Turkey’s cultural and (national) identity politics, which was most obviously maintained in the 1982 Constitution. This understanding, which can be summarized as to characterize all people living within the national territories as Turkish regardless of their ethnic origins, has brought about the denial of many languages in Turkey such as Kurdish, Abkhaz, Arabic, Albanian, Circassian, Armenian, Georgian, Kıpti, Laz, Pomak, Greek, Syriac, Tatar and Hebrew languages. The people who claimed cultural diversity and difference have always been viewed as dangerous vis-à-vis the “monolithic” cultural politics of the Turkish Republic; they have been punished on the accusations of “infidelity” and “separatism” on the one hand, and exposed in society to various policies of “devaluation”, on the other.

Although the arrangements that were devised recently as part of the process of Turkey’s accession to the European Union has brought some changes in the Turkish Republic’s traditional pro-status-quo approach, these arrangements fall short of establishing a truly multicultural society. For example, arrangements such as the Regulation on Education in Different Languages and Dialects Used Traditionally by Turkish Citizens in Daily Life and the Regulation on Radio and TV Broadcasting in Different Languages and Dialects Used Traditionally by Turkish Citizens in Daily Life have immediately put limits on the reform process.

The reforms that have been implemented so far and those that are planned to be implemented are far from meeting popular expectations. The core of the problem is very much about mentality change. It should be noted that a mentality change towards higher democracy standards would help to create internal peace and a harmonious social and moral climate. In this regard, specific policies should be devised and implemented in order to create equality among diverse ethnic and linguistic communities. Although the reforms that target democratization at the level of central authority are a positive step, local governments should be made autonomous so that democracy could permeate into the social fabric fully. The importance of municipalities, which are service institutions that come to power through democratic mechanisms, becomes clearer at this point. As the institutions closest to the people, municipalities are crucial with regard to the promotion of democracy and the improvement of the citizens’ democratic culture. While delivering services to meet local needs, municipalities involve in direct communication with the people. Therefore, they have to take into account all cultural and linguistic groups in the locality. The differences in the areas where municipalities deliver services are a natural situation and cultural richness. Social and cultural diversity should be included in politics as “colorfulness” and on the basis of a culture of tolerance that democratic pluralism produces. To this end, specific measures should be devised in order for all kinds of linguistic, cultural, religious and belief groups to express themselves fully and freely. “One-nation - one language” approach should be abandoned, and a pluralistic and participatory democratic process should be initiated.

In contemporary modern democracies the principle of “unity in diversity” has been put into practice by means of pluralistic and multilingual mechanisms. Multilingualism is guaranteed constitutionally in many states, and is being practiced by various municipalities. The states who have accepted the principle of multilingual municipal services can be counted as follows: Belgium, Switzerland, Canada, Israel, Sweden, Spain, Basque Country, India, China, Indonesia, England, Wales, Scotland, North Ireland, France, Bulgaria, etc.

Meeting the needs of people, municipalities detect those needs by communicating with local people. The necessity of face-to-face dialogue of municipalities with people in the locality brings about the problem of understanding local languages. Delivering municipal services in a multilingual framework is a necessity because of both the very reason and meaning of the existence of municipalities and the principle of democratic pluralism. We suggest the following with regard to application of multilingualism in delivering municipal services.

1. Before applications in specific localities, macro constitutional and legal arrangements should be made at the level of state administration. Specific measures should be taken so that citizens could participate with their own identities and languages into the processes that affect them directly or indirectly. The identity of “Türkiyelilik” [which literally means to be from Turkey] could be included in the Constitution as a roof term, and constitutional norms should be taken into account accordingly.

2. The ability of the municipalities to receive the demands and complaints of the local people properly and produce solutions in the light of these relies on whether the municipal officials and local people can express themselves clearly and understand each other. Because of this, before any specific application of multilingualism the municipalities should undertake preparatory activities. In this context, first of all, the rooms and desks, titles and duties should be defined in a multilingual way (written in Turkish, Kurdish, Zazaic, English, etc.)

3. Because it is not very possible that all units in the municipalities could understand and communicate through all of the local languages and dialects, the municipalities should hire interpreters as an institutional responsibility.

4. Within the framework of the law that regulates “The Right to Obtain Information”, the municipalities should be able to respond to the local demands for information in the local language through which the demand was raised in the first place.

5. Within the framework of multilingual municipal services, another suggestion can be that each and every linguistic community could form their own “People’s Assembly”. The assemblies could speak in their own languages in the meetings, and the points over which they have consensus should be taken as recommendations to the municipalities.

6. Municipalities should communicate with the people about declarations, announcements and campaigns in multiple languages.

7. Municipalities should prepare and publish their annual activity reports in multiple languages.

8. The era we live in is called the “Age of Information”. Most means of communication are based on information technologies. The spread of Internet technology has been directing the municipalities in new ways. While preparing their web sites, municipalities should take into account multilingual applications, and arrange the sites in all the languages and dialects that are used or can possibly be used.

9. Local languages should be used sufficiently in the local bulletins and publications that aim to inform people.

10. The names of roads, streets and parks in the residential areas where municipalities deliver services should be written in multiple languages.

11. One of the most common means of communication with the municipality is telephone. With the application of multilingualism in services, municipalities should be able to communicate with the citizens and deliver services in multiple languages. For this reason, the municipal personnel who receive phone calls could speak Kurdish, Arabic, Syriac, etc. as much as s/he can speak Turkish and English.

12. Besides, in order to contribute to the protection and preservation of the local languages used by citizens, municipalities should support studies on spelling and dictionaries. Also, municipalities could support studies on translation of World’s Classics into local languages as well as participate in activities that target children such as collecting and publishing stories and tales, educational brochures and child literature.

13. To know the local language should be a pre-condition for employment in the municipality.

14. In the delivery of local services, urban development plans as well as the projects prepared by engineers should be publicized in other languages besides the official language.

15. Official documents could be in other languages.

16. In the body of municipalities there should be libraries that have materials in different languages.

OPEN LETTER TO GEOFF HOON, MP, MINISTER OF STATE FOR EUROPE


Urgent call for an independent investigation into the alleged poisoning of Abdullah Ocalan


Fears that Abdullah Ocalan is slowly being poisoned in his Turkish prison cell are now being voiced with emergence of alarming evidence derived from independent laboratory tests made on samples of his hair.

The hair sample, obtained by his visiting lawyers, was sent to independent scientific analytical experts acting impartially with no knowledge as to whom the hair samples had belonged. Their analysis conclusively shows higher than normal levels of the elements strontium and chromium were present. This has confirmed the fears of Kurds that Mr Öcalan may be suffering from contamination with toxic chemicals while in prison.

An independent investigation - incidentally, also called for by the respected Turkish Human Rights Association (IHD), the Organization for Human Rights & Solidarity for Oppressed People (MAZLUMDER), and the Human Rights Foundation of Turkey (TIHV) - is the only way to allay fears that there is no organized plot to poison the Kurdish leader, who has now been in jail for 9 years and who reaches the age of 60 in 2008.

EU parliamentarian Feleknas Uca has also called upon EU states to take action: "Europe must send an independent doctors' committee to Imrali, and this is urgent". At the same time, the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) must visit Ocalan with Uca noting the following: "European states that criticize Guantanamo risk credibility by closing their eyes to Ocalan, who is [also] deprived of his legal rights in isolation at Imrali Island".

We wish to remind you that Turkey has an obligation under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights not to subject anyone to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. An independent investigation will not only establish the true facts but will also act to ensure that the Turkish state, if found guilty of charges that have been levelled, will be held accountable to them. We urge EU member states that are currently involved in monitoring the EU-Turkey 'accession process' to also endorse the call for an independent investigation into the matter.

Many Kurds are rightly concerned over the results obtained by the tests that have been undertaken. As Aysel Tugluk, deputy chairwoman of the Democratic Society Party (DTP), the main constitutional Kurdish supported political party in Turkey, told reporters, "If the allegations are true, it means that a planned murder is being consciously committed". Such an illegal act, if true, clearly represents a 'provocation' that must be condemned by all western leaders who claim to promote democratic and peaceful 'values', for it appears to be designed to stimulate conflict between Kurds and Turks at a time when peaceful initiatives, surely, must be supported.

Turkey appears to be embarking on a dangerous trajectory with now a real danger of the country descending into civil unrest and instability should the worst fears of many Kurds be allowed to go unheeded. Ocalan - who "was extraordinarily rendered by the US, Israel, and Turkey, in 1999, with the same wink-and-nod complicity of the EU" (Yilmaz, 2007) - remains a key player in any peace process that Turkey needs to engage with if it wishes to resolve the 'Kurdish Question', a move essential for it to become a fully fledged democratic state.

Recognising your keen interest in international affairs, we have hopes that you can give this matter your urgent attention.

Signed by


Signatories


Prof Noam Chomsky

Mark Thomas, comedian/journalist

Lord Dholakia

Lord Rea

Hywel Williams MP

Elfyn Llwyd MP

Rudi Vis MP

Prof Bill Bowring, Barrister, Professor of Law, Birkbeck College, University of London School of Law

Margaret Owen, Barrister, Member of the Bar Human Rights Committee. Adviser to the Kurdish Human Rights Project. Director of Widows for Peace through Democracy.

Richard McKane, Poet, Translator and Human Rights Interpreter

Professor Ken Coates, Chair of Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation

Stan Newens, President of “Liberation”

Stewart Hemsley, Chair Pax Christi

Nick Hildyard, policy analyst

Ben Hayes, Statewatch

David Morgan, journalist

Desmond Fernandes, political analyst, author of 'The Kurdish Genocide in Turkey' (Apec, 2007, forthcoming), Peace in Kurdistan Campaign

Frances Webber, barrister Garden Court Chambers

Smita Shah, barrister Garden Court Chambers

Jo Wilding, barrister Garden Court Chambers

Hugo Charlton, barrister

Professor HI Pilikian, Historian

Khatchatur I. Pilikian, Professor of Music & Art

Les Levidow, Campaign Against Criminalising Communities (CAMPACC)

Tom Frost, CAMPACC

Kofi Mawuli Klu, Chair Pan-Arikan Task Force for Internationalist Dialogue (PATFID)

Rachel Bird, human rights campaigner

Pete Weatherby, barrister at Garden Court North, Manchester

Jonathan Bloch, Liberal Democrat Councillor for Muswell Hill

Dr G Siddiqui, Leader of The Muslim Parliament

Ann Rossiter, writer

Sarah Parker, translator

Arzu Pesmen, Chair of Kurdish Federation UK

Ibrahim Dogus, Chair Halkevi Kurdish Turkish Community Centre

Alex Fitch, Peace in Kurdistan Campaign

Estella Schmid, Peace in Kurdistan Campaign



Copies of the letter will be sent to:

Terry Davis, Secretary General of the Council of Europe
Tony Lloyd MP, Leader of British delegation to CoE
Mr Murat Mercan (Justice & Development Party), President of Turkish delegation to CoE
Mr Abdul Kadir Ates(Republican People's Party), Chairperson of Political Affairs Committee of CoE

Contact: Peace in Kurdistan Campaign

Estella24@tiscali.co.uk

Tel 020 7586 5892



Tuesday, March 27, 2007

DEMOCRATIZATION AND DTP

"There are no magic answers, no miraculous methods to overcome the problems we face, just the familiar ones: honest search for understanding, education, organization, action that raises the cost of state violence for its perpetrators or that lays the basis for institutional change -- and the kind of commitment that will persist despite the temptations of disillusionment, despite many failures and only limited successes, inspired by the hope of a brighter future."
~ Noam Chomsky.


From Peace in Kurdistan Campaign, here's the report referenced in Osman Baydemir's letter. In this first part, the letter itself, the discussion centers around the democratization of the Kurdish areas at the local level and the role of the DTP. The report highlights the Ankara regime's discriminatory efforts against the Kurdish people at the local level and DTP in particular, and the role of this official state discrimination, in practice, as far a the democratization process goes.

The fact that there is even a mention of a "democratization process" in Turkey implies that the existence of democracy is a questionable notion that is quite contrary to the usual PR campaign which holds Turkey as a "model" of democracy.

This report and the appendices, which will be published here in the upcoming days, should be read in contrast with the usual propaganda that is presented in the Western press in general, and the American press in particular. Such an example can be found in today's Washington Times by resident Turkish PR expert, Tulin Daloglu.



Report on Local Government and Local Democracy Dynamics concerning the DTP Municipalities in Turkey


1 Introduction and Report Framework


On the road to EU membership, Turkey has made a strong commitment to meet European democratic standards guided by the acquis communautaire, and initiated a legal process in which EU common principles were translated into national policies. Consequently, significant legislative reforms at the level of local government (Law on Metropolitan Municipalities, Law on Municipalities, Law on the Special Provincial Administration, Law on Public Administration and Law on Unions of Local Administrations) and constitutional reforms lifting restrictions on human rights and cultural freedoms (e.g. on political expression, the use of languages other than Turkish in public media) were drafted. Accompanied by critical constitutional reforms, genuine local and regional governmental reform promised to carve up new spaces for enhancing the dynamics of local and regional democracy. Also as the Congress Report of 19961 noted, this reform trend seemed capable, “even if applied in the same manner to the whole of the country” of “contribut[ing] to create conditions for better exercise of democratic rights, including the Kurdish-speaking population in the South-East of the country”.

Turkey’s historic “tradition of a highly-centralised unitary state”, already predicted and repeatedly affirmed to “stand in the way of reforms needed by the modern Turkish state and society” by the Congress Rapporteurs2, proved to be a major obstacle to Turkey’s full commitment to a broader reform package of measures needed for the realization of effective and efficient democratic changes at the level of local governments.3 Given the delicate political nature of the reform process, Turkey’s willingness to establish a viable link between these reforms, and its ability to render them effective in practice were particularly important for the development of real democratic governance at the local and regional levels.

This report aims to give an up-to-date account of the actual implementation of the decentralization process and the interrelated promotion of self-improvement, subsidiarity, and effective local governance for the fifty-six DTP (Democratic Society Party) municipalities in Turkey. Ethnically marked as “Kurdish” and thus historically relegated to the periphery of highly centralized governmental practices, DTP municipalities are a crucial window through which the functioning of local government in Turkey can be interpreted. Yet, in terms of local democratic dynamics, the political, cultural and economic situation in the provinces where most of the DTP municipalities are located4 poses a much more intricate and fragile picture, due to the presence of a long term socio-political conflict that is only partially shaped by, but hardly limited to, the highly centralized state tradition of Turkey. The fact that, despite their significant base of local support, no DTP members could become a member of the Turkish National Assembly during the 2002 elections—representation is contingent on a 10 percent election threshold—further highlights the critical role of the DTP municipalities as crucial actors/interlocutors for the development of local democracy in these areas.5 Furthermore, as shown by the socio-economic development index prepared by the State Planning Organization, almost all of the DTP municipalities are at the same time located in the socially and economically least developed provinces of the South-Eastern and Eastern Anatolian Regions of Turkey. Ridden by social and political conflict for the last 20 years, these two regions have historically been at the periphery of national socio-economic formations and development policies.

The intense legal, administrative and financial difficulties currently faced by these 56 municipalities provide a starting point for examining the challenges and trends of the actualization of local democratic and governmental reforms, because they highlight the relationship between DTP municipalities and central governmental institutions in Turkey. This report, part of a larger report concerning DTP municipalities, will focus on the legal issues (i.e. investigations and court cases) faced by the DTP municipalities.


2 Findings, Issues and Concerns


As noted in the 2005 Report on Local and Regional Democracy in Turkey, despite the strong wish for decentralisation in Turkey and the ambitious reform programme, still, the “actual practice of decentralized government on the ground” remains highly unsatisfactory, particularly when “measured by reference to legislation actually passed and implemented” (para. 8). Concerns and recommendations laid out by the Congress6 are definitely shared by all municipalities in Turkey, and are experienced acutely by smaller municipalities with more restricted access to financial resources. Yet, it is the contention of this report that this arduous process of decentralization in Turkey is more heavily felt and has effects different in kind and degree for the DTP municipalities, which are ethnically marked as “Kurdish” and thus are accordingly subjected to interrelated yet different discriminatory legal, political, cultural and economic governmental practices on the ground. Such policies are justified on the basis of a regnant perception that the interests and democratic demands of the Kurdish-speaking local people are also an imminent threat to national security. A content analysis of the legal, social and economic problems currently faced by these municipalities provides insights into the degree to which the principles of good local governance and self-improvement are ensured by the central government in these municipalities.


Legal Issues:


Currently, there are hundreds of investigations and legal cases filed against the DTP Municipalities. While the sheer number of the cases is an alerting fact on its own, the content and arguments of the cases themselves have a greater bearing on local democracy in the region.

First of all, to put into practice a form of law enforcement that is fair and impartial and respectful of basic human rights, and a form of law that observes the prevalent values of a society—in short, a form that promotes the rule of law—is one of the basic tenets of good local governance. A very important issue for local democracy is the “principle of proportionality for any administrative regulation or act imposing a limit on self-government”, stipulated in the Article 8 of Charter.7 As noted previously by the Congress, it is very important to make sure “that a proper procedure exists, including the rights of the defence,and that careful provision is made in legislation concerning ancillary or principal penalties affecting the actual exercise of elected office”.

However, the frequency of the official investigations into the DTP mayors especially in the provinces that were until very recently governed by the State Emergency Rule—which is to say, the provinces most effective in the politics of the region, is remarkable. For example, within the span of a three year term at the office (2004-2006), a total of 53 investigations and 7 courtcases were opened against Osman Baydemir, the mayor of the Diyarbakir Metropolitan Municipality (DMM, hereafter). The frequency of such investigations filed by the Ministry of Interior is perceived in the region, in one mayor’s words, as part of “an effort to reduce elected local representatives’ status to that of the officials appointed by the central government in Ankara”. Within this context, it should also be kept in mind that these perceptions are grounded in a regional history of previously abolished political parties and dismissed mayors.

The grounds on which these investigations are filed and justified are particularly effective in creating such an impression of the arbitrary and unproportionate use of supervisonary powers over elected mayors in the region. The most problematic aspect of these files is not simply having the existence of a legal basis for such cases, but the lack of constructive and positive reference to the existing laws. The obstructive and negative use of existing laws is most significant for the investigations and cases grounded on accusations directly related to freedom of speech and thought, and, thus, which are filed through a separate court system (CMUK, Code of Criminal Procedures). Overall, the investigations and cases filed at the CMUK points to the neglect of the principles such as democratization as well as respect to human rights and cultural freedoms that are promoted not only by the Congress but also officially approved by the Turkish government through the European documents such as the Charter of Local Self Government. An example well to the point is provided by the case filed against Abdullah Demirbas, the mayor of Sur municipality of Diyarbakir, on the grounds of “making propoganda to promote the aims of the terrorist organization PKK” due to his speech titled, “Municipal Services and Local Governments in the light of Multilingualism”, which was delivered at the European Social Forum in January 2006.8 Although the content of the speech, very well summarized by its title, does not include any single direct or indirect reference to the PKK, the very fact that the speech aimed to explore the relations between multilanguagism and local democracy and that it was delivered by a DTP Mayor was enough to render it as a form of ‘PKK propaganda’ in the eyes of central government authorities. Mayor Demirbas was acquitted on all charges on 19.09.2006.

The indictment of the Roj TV letter case (2006/350) was also written through a similar centralist point of view, which immediately criminalizes DTP Mayors’ legal and democratic demands by associating them with the PKK and separatist tendencies but never contextualizes them in relation to Turkey’s ongoing process of democratization and negotiations with the EU.9 In the indictment, 56 DTP Mayors were charged with “abetting and aiding an armed organization” due to their joint letter sent to the Danish Prime Minister Rasmussen concerning the possible closing of Roj TV. The first court hearing was held on September 26, 2006.10 In his defense for the case, the DMM Mayor Osman Baydemir stated, ‘The fact that a Kurdish channel broadcasts from outside of Turkey disturbs us, too. We believe that it is more appropriate to consider the possibility of a Kurdish TV broadcasting from within the borders of Turkey and in accordance with the legal legislations within the context of EU-Turkey relations. The letter was written to point to the fact that for democratic life and culture to flourish in Turkey the public media and press institutions should not be silenced, that the ban of Roj TV will not contribute to democratic life in Turkey.’ The next hearing for this case will be held on November 21, 2006. While there are many ongoing cases at the CMUK—almost all regarding mayors—the mayor of Cizre has recently been found guilty and sentenced to a prison term due to his speech on Roj TV, and this being the result of a case handled through the CMUK.

The “misuse of municipal office and resources” is a frequent theme/accusation directly aiming to question the providing of municipal services in these investigations. For example, in the case filed on the grounds of “misuse of municipal office and resources” (2006/15), Sur Mayor Abdullah Demirbas was indicted on charge of “unlawfully” building a memorial statue. The statue, named “Statue for the Children of the World” and dedicated to stopping the violence against the children, was built after twelve-year-old Ugur Kaymaz had been killed by 13 bullets by the police in 2005, in Kiziltepe, Mardin. While providing cultural services and, included therein, building statues is among the lawful duties of a municipality, Mayor Demirbas, a teacher himself, is furthermore widely known among the local people by his sensitivity and sincere efforts towards protecting and improving the rights and lives of children in Diyarbakir.11 The file was dismissed as of the last week of May.

In a similar vein, in an investigation filed on July 8th, 2006, Viransehir Mayor Emrullah Cin was indicted on charge of “misuse of municipal resources” due to the publication of bulletins about municipal services both in Turkish and Kurdish. Mayor Cin stated that Kurdish was the mother tongue of the majority of the Viransehir’s population (app. 120.000), thus in publishing bulletins also in Kurdish, the municipality aimed to better communicate municipal services to the public. Mayor Cin further noted that publication of municipal bulletins was not considered a crime anywhere in Turkey, and that the decision for publication was made by the municipal council and in accordance with the municipal law, and, furthermore, that the RTUK (Radio and Television Supreme Council of Turkey) laws also did not consider publication of such bulletins as a criminal activity, thus municipality acted fully in accordance with and in the limits of existing laws.

A recurrent theme in the investigations filed on grounds of “misuse of municipal office and resources” is the providing of ambulance or burial services for the PKK militants. This particular issue is very important for ensuring that local governments can provide social services to their local citizens based on the promotion of principles of equality and responsiveness. Although militants families’ are among the inhabitants of these cities, and although municipalities are obliged to provide such services once requested by a local citizen, with every such incident a new case is filed against the municipalities. In his defense for a relevant case, DMM Mayor Osman Baydemir noted, ‘This responsibility, this duty [of ] providing ambulance services when requested by a local citizen] legally belongs to us within the borders of Diyarbakir. First and foremost, once met with such a request [coming from a local citizen], we are obliged to comply with the provisions of the relevant law. Furthermore, once met with such a request, under no condition it is our duty to do a search on the identity of the person who has lost his life, of the dead person. This is a humane obligation, a duty relating to conscience.’ So far, 16 such investigations have been filed against the mayors and/or municipal personnel of 9 DTP municipalities. It should be noted that the previous dismissal of similar cases (e.g. DMM/2004, Gokcebag Municipality/2005) does not prevent new such cases (e.g. DMM/2006) from being opened. At the hearing of September 27, 2006, the DMM Mayor was acquitted from charges of misuse of municipal resources by the act of paying 16.5 YTL for the ambulance service. In a similar vein, despite the fact that condolence visits are well known to be a crucial component of the cultural traditions in the region, the condolence visits of DTP Mayors to the families of local citizens killed by security forces are also always subject to official investigation. The fact that Mayors’ visits are always accompanied by visits to the families of local security forces injured or killed during the events as well is effective in the dismissal of such investigations (e.g. 2005/915, opened against Diyarbakir Metropolitan, Sur, Baglar, Yenisehir, Kayapinar and Dicle Mayors), yet this does not prevent new investigations with every such visit.

The indictments grounded on ‘misuse of municipal office and resources’ are further effective in creating a sense of misuse of supervisionary powers as a means of exerting undue political and administrative pressure over local governments, particularly when cases are opened in spite of investigation files that already includes expert/inspector’s reports or official documents suggesting that there is no ground for the accusations outlined in the indictments. For example, in an investigation (2006/8747) opened against the DMM Municipality, DMM personnel, including the Mayor, were charged on “misuse of office” by unlawfully disqualifying a lower cost proposal during the tendering process of a DISKI (Diyarbakir Drinking Water and Sewage Directorate) Project. Although the inspector sent by the Ministry of Interior stated in his report that the decision to disqualify the aforementioned proposal was taken in line with the legal procedures and in profit of the municipality, that the price proposed by the company was much lower than the actual cost of the project application procedures (the difference between the winning proposal and the disqualified one was about 1 billion TL); the investigation was finalized into a court case.

Ensuring equality and responsiveness to the local people’s aspirations in providing social services and developing the region based on a clear vision and strategy with participation of the citizenry in all the processes of development so that they can acquire a sense of ownership and responsibility for the progress of their region are very critical issues in terms of local democracy dynamics and good governance. The investigations filed against the DTP mayors—on grounds of the use of Kurdish language while they are doing their public duties such as heading marriage ceremonies, or in official letters such as new year celebrations—frame the existing insensitivity to the principles aforementioned, completely ignoring the fact that both these mayors’ and the majority of the local people’s mother tongue is Kurdish in these cities. Even though Kurdish has been officially recognized as a spoken language in Turkey since 1991, and although with certain restrictions, it can be used in public media as well, nevertheless, the use of Kurdish language by the mayors in public speeches or in public services remains a very ‘sensitive’ issue, often subject to some form of restriction or investigation by the central government authorities. While there are investigations opened solely for the use of Kurdish language in public speeches (e.g. DMM, Kiziltepe, Sur, Silvan Municipalities) or for use of Kurdish in municipal services (e.g. Viransehir Municipality example above), the use of Kurdish language in municipal services is sometimes directly restricted by the governorships. For example, Kayapinar City Council’s efforts to give culturally significant Kurdish names to the parks and streets of Diyarbakir were obstructed by the Diyarbakir Governorship because these names were said to either include letters that did not exist in the Turkish alphabet (e.g. ‘w’) or showed parallelism with PKK discourses. The court case filed by the Kayapinar City Council against the Diyarbakir Governorship is still in process.

The Diyarbakir Metropolitan Municipality is the only metropolitan municipality governed by a DTP Mayor. It carries a further symbolic and visible importance due to Diyarbakir’s strategic cultural place in the historical, geographical and political landscape in the region and in Turkey. DMM is at the same time the DTP municipality that is subjected to the greatest number of investigations and cases, as also noted above. The mayor of Diyarbakir has been experiencing severe pressure with regard to freedom of speech.

The Public Prosecutor of Diyarbakir opened a case against Mr. Osman Baydemir in the 6th Heavy Criminal Court because of some of the content of his speeches during the incidents in March 2006 in the city center of Diyarbakir.12 In the indictment (no. 2006/417) dated 22.06.2006, the mayor is accused of “aiding and abetting the terrorist organization PKK” and the prosecutor demands the mayor to be sentenced according to Article 250 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. During the March events, despite all the efforts of the mayor in bringing calm to the events, which were all realized in constant coordination with the provincial governor as also stated in the indictment, nevertheless, parts of his public statements were distorted, and consequently he was turned into a target for state officials and the national media. Furthermore, the mayor was physically attacked by the security forces on his way to the location of incidents, where, in dialogue with the Governor of Diyarbakir, he was going to try to persuade the demonstrating people to go back to their homes. The police officers, who assaulted the mayor’s bodyguard with batons, also threatened to kill him. Again during the events, the municipal ambulance was attacked by the police officers, and the driver of ambulance was heavily assaulted. Add to these, the Ministry of Interior launched three different investigations about Mr. Baydemir because of his public speeches during the incident, and these investigations have been already finalized into a court case the first hearing of which was held on October 3, 2006. The second hearing of the case will be held on December 26, 2006. On the other hand, the 35 investigations opened against “public officials” on torture and killings of the civilians during the incident are still at the preparation stage. Furthermore, these investigation files include no specific names for these public officials, that is, they are filed against “unknown perpatrators”, and there has been no known official effort to find the perpatrators of these torture and killing incidents as well. Thus, unfortunately, it has been expected that the preparatory stage of these investigation files will indeed never be completed, such that the files will either be dismissed or dropped due to prescription.

Another case was opened against Mr. Baydemir because of his interview with the journalist Cemal Subasi of the weekly Tempo—a very popular and well established mainstream magazine, with an audience of millions in Turkey. The interview was published on 16 January, 2006. In the interview, Baydemir expressed his various ideas about the Kurdish problem in Turkey. 15 sentences of this 2 pages long interview13 were interpreted by the Public Prosecutor as evidence of his aim to denigrate a particular group of people through the press by perpetuating divisions among citizens on the basis of social class, racial, religious and regional differences. The Public Prosecutor accuses Osman Baydemir of transgressing the limits of the right to criticize and freedom of expression granted by the Turkish Constitution, and be punished with the Article 216 of the Turkish Penal Code due to his “baseless criticisms” which gives the impression “as if” the Turkish Republic carries out a policy of pressure and violence on Kurds and the values that represent these people. The public prosecutor wants Baydemir get sentenced in accordance with Articles 216/2 and 218 of the Turkish Penal Code.

Simply, the number of the investigations and cases opened both on grounds of municipal services and of freedom of thought and speech are greater in Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia regions as compared both to the DTP municipalities located in the other regions of Turkey and to the non-DTP municipalities nationwide. Furthermore, the frequency of investigations is joined by the lack of constructive use or interpretation of the existing laws, especially in reference to principles such as democratization and respect for human rights and cultural freedoms —a situation indeed valid for every citizen in Turkey in varying degrees, and very much due to an administrative and legal system that has recently gone through a major and rapid change in terms of content and in theory, but is not accompanied by a matching pace of change in terms of official mentality on actual ground. These two facts, united in the investigations and cases opened against the DTP mayors, form a legal and political context which translates into a ‘psychological pressure’ and a sense of ‘discriminatory, unfair centralist attitude’—in the mayors’ own words—in the official and private lives of the DTP mayors. The situation is expected to detoriate significantly with the new Anti-terror Laws, after which “DTP Mayors will not even be able to speak or move for fear of an investigation”, as a DTP mayor states.


3 Conclusion:


The present peace process and the concurrently ongoing social conflict affect the operation of the DTP municipalities in ways not decipherable through a simple analysis of the decentralization process in Turkey. Investigations and cases filed against the DTP Mayors in Eastern and Southeasterm Anatolia form only a part of a broader picture that points to a sense of discriminatory and unfair centralist attitudes towards the DTP municipalities in the region. There are financial and administrative difficulties such as procedural difficulties posed by the State Planning Organization on access to international funds.14 There are daily tensions between the municipal, military and other public officials such as the local military troops’ marching with slogans and collecting trash in the city center of Hakkari with banners reading “Instead of separatist politics, do your own job”. These too require detailed analysis. However, as noted before, this report is specifically written to highlight the political and administrative pressure exerted through the legal proceedings which have recently become extremely frequent and regular and thus have been almost normalized for the DTP municipalities in the region. It is the contention of this report that the present adverse situation with regards to the investigations and court cases launched against the DTP mayors in the region, on the other hand, can be overcome with proper, effective, efficient and immediate implementation of the local democracy and local good governance concepts on ground in Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia.


Epilogue, written on March 15, 2007



After the conclusion of this report in October 2006, and especially after the National Security Council meeting in December 2006, pressures over Democratic Society Party (DTP) have systematically and radically increased; investigations, arrests and penalties against the DTP executives reached to unbearable levels. Many executive members of the DTP were sentenced, including the chair Mr. Ahmet Turk and the vice-chairs Aysel Tugluk and Sedat Yurtdas. Tens of DTP province offices were raided by the police, and over seventy members of DTP were taken under custody. More than 30 of these were arrested, including the branch chairs of DTP in the largest cities in the region such as Diyarbakir, Van, Batman and Mardin. Human rights activists are also under heavy pressure in the region. The Urfa and Diyarbakir branch chairs of the Human Rights Association (HRA) as well as Bingol’s former branch chair of HRA were sentenced. Several new investigations were launched and court cases opened against the mayors who are members of the DTP. Mayor of Kayapinar District of Diyarbakir was sentenced. The mayor of Diyarbakir Metropolitan Municipality Osman Baydemir will have at least 5 different court cases in March and April 2007. Finally, the Ministry of Interior appealed to the State Council to dismiss the mayor of Sur district of Diyarbakir, Mr. Abdullah Demirbas, and dissolve the Sur Municipal Council, claiming that by taking the decision to use multiple languages in delivering municipal services Mr. Demirbas and the Sur Municipal Council exceeded the bounds and limits of their duties and authorities, and violated the 3rd and 2nd articles of the Constitution. We worry that such developments are indicators of increasing pressure over the DTP mayors in the coming months of 2007, which would narrow down the sphere of democratic local politics in Turkey in general and in the region in particular.



1 Report on the State of Local and Regional Democracy in Turkey - CG (4) 3 Part II, Rapporteur: Halvdan SKARD, 1996: para.8.
2 ibid: para. 9; Follow up to Recommendation 29 (1997) CG/INST (8) 27: Information Report on Local and Regional Democracy in Turkey, Rapporteurs: Anders KNAPE, Hans-Ulrich STÖCKLING, 2001: para. 3.4 and 4.10; Local and Regional Democracy in Turkey - CG (12) 25 Part II, Rapporteurs: Anders KNAPE, Hans-Ulrich STÖCKLING, 2005: para. 3.9, 4.3, 8.4 and 10.2.
3 As also highlighted in the Congress Report of 2005 (para. 9.2), devolution reforms were subjected to criticisms on the grounds of their “potential of distorting the unity and the integrity of the State as well as consistency and complementarity of public services”. As pointed to also in the same report, the President of the Republic voiced these views in his vetoes, for example in case of the draft Law on the Special Provincial Administration, by noting that “changing the present system of public administration would be incompatible with such constitutional principles as unity of the State, integral unity of administration, administrative tutelage and public interest”. Such concerns were already translated into significant obstacles for the reform process, when they resulted in specific reservations made on the European Charter of Local Self-Government, in reluctance to ratify the Framework Charter for the Protection of and the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages, or in inability to formulate a specific law draft on local finance deemed absolutely necessary for local autonomy (2005: para. 6a).
4 Most of the DTP Municipalities are located in and around the provinces that were considered to pose a “threat to national security” and thus were governed by the Emergency State Rule until 2002. These provinces are Elazig, Bingöl, Tunceli, Van, Diyarbakir, Mardin, Siirt, Hakkâri, Batman, Sirnak.
5 For example, during the 2003 elections, 8 of the 10 parliamentary seats in Diyarbakir were won by the DTP.
6 The report highlights the following as critical areas/issues for the local democracy in Turkey: the transfer of powers in accordance with newly adopted legislation; insufficient resources to ensure “effective management” locally; heavy state tutelage over local authorities; the lack of a law regarding local finances and heavy dependence of smaller municipalities upon central government grants due to lack of independent resources; and need for greater decentralisation at the provincial level.
7 Congress Report on Monitoring the Implementation of the European Charter of Local Self-Government, By Alain DELCAMP, European Local Government Association For Research (ELGAR)Paris
8 A translated copy of the original speech is provided in Appendix 1.
9 A copy of the original letter presented to the Prime Minister Rasmussen is provided in the Appendix 2.
10 A translated (in English) copy of the joint legal defense prepared and signed by the DTP mayors and submitted to the court is provided in the Appendix 3.
11 During Mayor’s time in office, one children’s library, an education center, a plastic arts workshop and eight open air parks were opened for children. A municipal children’s council was founded. All the primary schools in the district were given financial support to improve their libraries (4 of such libraries are finished). The local Children Festival of Sur Municipality was turned into an International one. Municipality also started to publish magazines and tale books for children.
12 A partial and selective transcription of these speeches were submitted as evidence in the indictment. A literal translation of these transcriptions in the indictment, as well as two press releases by Osman Baydemir which were used by the public prosecutor to support the indictment are attached in Appendices 4, 5 and 6. The incidents started when a large crowd of mourners refused to disperse after the funeral ceremonies of 4 of the 14 members of the PKK in Diyarbakir, who were reportedly killed by chemical weapons by the Turkish security forces on March 24th during a military operation in the rural area between Mus and Bingol provinces. The police attacked the crowd who refused to disperse after the funeral ceremony in Diyarbakir city center. Dozens of people were injured in the ensuing clash between the police and the demonstrators who wanted to march to the city center. On March 29th, the security build up reached immense dimensions with the transfer of the gendarmerie, special police teams and army units located in neighboring provinces into the city. While immense amounts of tear gas and pepper spray were used to disperse the crowds, 3 people were killed on the same day. This was the background on which the street clashes spread all over the city, also including the Dicle University Campus, and the confrontation/polarization between the state security forces and the demonstrators was transformed into unforeseen levels of violence. In the following days, the protests spread to the provinces of Batman, Mardin (Kiziltepe and Nusaybin districts), Urfa (Viransehir district), Siirt, Sirnak (Silopi District) and eventually to Istanbul. According to the data provided by the Human Rights Association of Turkey, as of April 6th, 563 people (200 of them under 18) were detained in Diyarbakir; 554 of the cases were referred to the Public Prosecutor and 382 of those (91 of them under 18) were arrested. 13 people, 10 of them in Dioyarbakir, were killed all throughout the incidents. 4 of the killed were under 18. From the very first day the events started on, the mayor of Diyarbakir Metropolitan Municipality put forth much effort to ensure prudence and steadiness in the city together with district mayors, executive members of Diyarbakir Branch of Democratic Society Party, NGO representatives and the Diyarbakir Democracy Platform. To this end, the mayor had two press releases. (Appendix). While pointing to the fact that the events stemmed from the inability to find a democratic solution to the Kurdish problem, he invited the security forces to steadiness and not use fire-arms when dispersing the demonstrators. Similarly, while inviting the demonstrators and the people of Diyarbakir to prudence and steadiness, he asked the demonstrators stop the protests; not to involve in violent activities under any conditions, and not to damage public property and stores. Besides, the mayor met with the demonstrators in more than ten different locations throughout the city and tried to persuade them return to their homes. Especially on the first day, March 28th, his efforts proved to be successful, even if partially. However, it was not possible to prevent the events that occurred on March 30th after the funeral ceremony of the three civilians who were killed on the 28th and 29th. Seven people more were killed on that day.
13 Sentences quoted from the interview, literally translated and presented as provided in the indictment, are as follows: “ Each ethnic identity should be able to join public life with their own identity… Common denominator could be the supra identity of being from Turkey on a geographical basis... Isolation of Abdullah Ocalan is unacceptable... Isolation will cause further deepening of the violence… Our region has been subjected to a policy of impoverishment… The victim of this will of course not be a single side. If we cannot overcome the ethnic identity conflict, eyes may be looking outward. Our region is not disturbed about the recent developments in Northern Iraq. Ocalan’s effect cannot be denied. When Ocalan was brought to Turkey in 1999, some armed people left borders of Turkey in line with hi announcements. It should be accepted that he has an influential place in a certain circle. This cannot be overlooked. Osman Baydemir wants Roj TV not be closed-off, wants the isolation policy on Abdullah Ocalan to be lifted. It is not possible to accept the current isolation policy towards Ocalan. Its continuatigon will deepen the violence.”
14 See Appendix 7 for further information.



Appendices to this report will be published on Rastî in the upcoming days.

Monday, March 26, 2007

NEGOTIATIONS, CONFUSION, AND A PETITION AGAINST SHARI'A

"How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four; calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg."
~ Abraham Lincoln.


Hmm. . . Khalilzad admits the US negotiates with "terrorists," from Lebanon's Daily Star:


Khalilzad said US Embassy officials and military commanders as well as Iraqi officials had met representatives of insurgent-linked groups several times for talks.

"They have taken place and they are continuing to take place," he said, while declining to give any specifics because "people's lives are at stake."


That's interesting because I've been told hundreds of times, maybe even thousands of times, that the US does not negotiate with "terrorists."

It's kind of funny too, to see that Khalilzad is suffering delusions of grandeur by presuming to speak for the American people when he was elected by nobody.

Hmm . . . I guess Ian Paisley talks to "terrorists" too. From the NYTimes:


After years of mutual hostility and recrimination, the leaders of Northern Ireland’s dominant rival groups, Sinn Fein’s Gerry Adams and the Protestant leader, the Rev. Ian Paisley, met today for their first face-to-face talks and agreed to form a joint administration for the province on May 8.

[ . . . ]

“The word ‘historic’ has to be used,” said Brian Feeny, a historian at St. Mary’s University College in Belfast, “It was the only way it was ever going to work. The two leaders of the two traditions had to do the deal.”

[ . . . ]

“We are very conscious of the many people who have suffered,” Mr. Adams said. “We owe it to them to build the best possible future. It is a time for generosity, a time to be mindful of the common good and of the future of all our people.

A few minutes earlier, Mr. Paisley, who had insisted on the delay until May 8, had said: “We must not allow our justified loathing of the horrors and tragedies of the past to become a barrier to creating a better and more stable future. In looking to the future we must never forget those who have suffered during the dark period from which we are, please God, emerging.”


Well, I guess it helped that the British government stopped its false flag operations designed to lay the blame on the IRA. It's too bad Turkey is still so far behind the power curve when it comes to the PKK.

Speaking of the PKK, Zaman has a confusing article about Ocalan and the PKK today. Serafettin Elci, the only Kurd in Turkey who can get away with talking about dividing the "unitary" state through federalism without having several thousand investigations opened on him thinks Ocalan has betrayed the Kurds by abandoning the idea of an independent Kurdistan. That's a bit ironic since Celal Talabanî denies any desire for an independent Kurdistan in the South and Barzanî has not pressed for independence:


The ultimate goal of both men is an independent Kurdistan. But they realize that, for now, they must work within a federal structure under a central Iraqi government.


Although Masûd Barzanî has spoken of independence in a more positive way, and although the straw poll on independence taken in the January 2005 elections shows that 98% of Kurds in South Kurdistan desired independence, Barzanî continues to cooperate with Baghdad, most likely at the behest of the Americans. Does Elci complain about this?

Funny that part about "Ocalan distancing himself from the Kurdish leaders of Iraq." Really? Whoever wrote that must have been vacationing on Neptune during the 1990s.

Elci is concerned that Ocalan warns Northern Kurds not to trust the US nor to rely on South Kurdistan to solve the situation of Kurds under Turkish occupation. When did Kurds trust the US? In 1975? In 1991? Or more recently when the US bombed Salahaddin University, or ran roughshod over the Iranian consulate in Hewlêr, or demanded that the Iraqi flag be flown in Kurdistan? Where was the US during Anfal and Helebçe? Where was it when Turkish aircraft were dropping bombs on South Kurdistan's villages during the "safe haven?"

Then the US has assisted with the genocide of Kurds under Turkish occupation, giving Turkey all the weapons and military training it needed to carry out the slaughter, covering up all the atrocities good NATO member Turkey perpetrated against the Kurdish people. More recently, the US assisted with the assault on Kurdish leaders and intellectuals in Europe, appointed a member of the US war industry to "coordinate" the PKK for Turkey, rejected PKK's moves for a political solution to the situation in Turkey as well as rejecting out of hand the fifth unilateral ceasefire. Yet the US claims no option is off the table when it comes to PKK and it continues to propogate Turkish lies about the Kurdish refugees at Maxmur Camp.

Additionally, there have been no moves to include Kurds under Turkish occupation in the trilateral group formed to "coordinate" the PKK. The only members of that club are Turkey, Iraq, and the US. Why then should Northern Kurds expect a resolution to Turkish repression from Hewlêr? And hasn't Barzanî said that Turkey must solve it's problems with Kurds of the North on its own and politically?

What was it that Reagan used to say? "Trust, but verify?" That's the only way to trust the Americans, and anyone who simply trusts is a fool . . . or worse.

By the way, I like the way Zaman censored Layla Zana's Newroz speech:


Kurdish sources who wished to remain anonymous told Today's Zaman. Zana said in a recent speech that she considered Iraqi Kurdish leaders Massoud Barzani and Jalal Talabani as guides for the Kurdish nation . . .


Uh, Zana said Talabanî, Barzanî, and Ocalan were the leaders of Kurds, and a complaint has been filed against her for saying it.

As for amnesty and a truth commission, they are both absolute necessities. Zaman fails to say from whom the idea of a truth commission "attracts the strongest anger," but if there's any truth to that claim, then the anger is coming from the ones who stand to lose from it. Since both Ocalan and the PKK insist on this issue, they must not be the ones who will lose when the truth is revealed.


If you don't want to see Shari'a considered as a major source of law in South Kurdistan, there's a petition you can sign at PetitionOnline against Article 7 of the proposed South Kurdistan constitution. A teaser:


An appointed committee to prepare a draft constitution for Kurdistan Region has suggested the following formulation in article No 7: “This Constitution stresses the identification of the majority of Kurdish people as Muslims, thus the fundamental tenets of Islamic Sharia law will be considered as one of the major sources for legislation making”.

This campaign declares that such an article prepares the ground for forced Islamisation of law in Kurdistan in the future. This poses a grave threat. We consider it a major attack on the basic rights and liberties of the people of this region. In particular, it will have worrying consequences for the rights of women and for the space for secular and progressive opinion in Kurdistan to find a voice. We want to make the world aware of this threat and mobilise to counter it.

There is no question that making Islamic Sharia Law a base for law making in Kurdistan will inevitably produce attacks on freedom of thought and expression and restrictions on civil rights. Gender apartheid will be practiced. We have seen the consequences of Sharia law in countries like Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Afghanistan. We need only to look to the south of Iraq where the Islamic Shitte parties are in power and are forcing through Islamisation with an inevitable rise of bloody sectarianism, attacks on modernity and civilisation itself as consequences.


Apparently, one of the initiators of the campaign, Houzan Mahmoud, has already received death threats for her work, the most recent coming from Ansar al-Islam. As a result, she has increased her work on behalf of Kurdish and Iraqi women.

BIJÎ HOUZAN!

Sunday, March 25, 2007

COUNTDOWN TO ANOTHER INEFFECTIVE INVASION?

"For many Turkish intellectuals, freedom of speech has become a struggle in North America as well as in our native country. What is happening to me now could happen to any scholar who dissents from the official state version of history."
~Taner Akcam.



Dogu Ergil has some information on possible upcoming Turkish operations in South Kurdistan, at Zaman:


After a meeting of retired Gen. Joseph Ralston, US special envoy on countering the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) -- a title that the Turkish press has transformed into “special envoy for counterterrorism” -- held on Jan. 29 with Massoud Barzani, the president of the Kurdistan regional government, and his vice president, Kosrat Rasul, Turkey has reportedly been given a green light from the US to attack PKK positions on the Kandil Mountain.

The same sources say that the military invasion will start in the beginning of April 2007. This was critical news that both the Turkish establishment and a part of the public have long been anticipating.

Will it bring relief as expected? Or will the operations get rid of the gangrene that is referred to as the “Kurdish problem”? That remains to be seen. However both the Americans and the Turkish establishment must be quite relieved to have convinced the Kurdish leaders of Iraq to give the green light to a Turkish military operation on Kandil, where the PKK contingency camps are and from which it conducts armed forays into Turkish soil.


Getting "rid of the gangrene that is referred to as the 'Kurdish problem'" will only happen when Turkey finally genocides the last Kurd from Turkish-occupied Kurdistan; however he does question the effectiveness of yet another Turkish invasion of South Kurdistan. He is correct that Qandil is far from the border with Turkish-occupied Kurdistan and that it's not likely that the TSK will engage in infantry operations in the mountains against PKK. This leaves only air operations as an option, something that is not likely to have much effect on the gerîlas but will certainly result in casualties in the civilian population, as happened during Turkish bombing of South Kurdistan during the so-called "safe haven" of Operation Northern Watch.

Ergil mentions the cooperation that Barzanî and Talabanî have given to the Ankara regime during its military operations in South Kurdistan against the Kurdish gerîlas. What he does not mention is that the Southern leadership's cooperation with the Ankara regime against Northern Kurds began long before the 1990s or even the founding of the PKK in 1978. That cooperation goes back at least to 1971.

Referencing a survey of the Turkish population, it appears that the majority of over 300,000 respondents do not want a military engagement. Given that the Ankara regime has never been successful in its 20-odd military pacifications of Northern Kurds, and given that military engagements will never solve what is essentially a political problem, it looks very much like the Ankara regime, with US backing, is setting itself up for failure yet again.

Ergil recognizes that "[t]he US infatuation with dealing with terrorism through military means has reinforced the traditional Turkish attitude and allows no other option than organizing cross-border operations as if the root cause of the problem lies in Iraq." The fact that one of Lockheed Martin's directors is the "PKK coordinator" for Turkey and it should be brilliantly clear exactly what it is that fuels the American "infatuation." It is none other than the worship of the Dollar, as discussed by former CIA Istanbul base deputy chief, Philip Giraldi, last week:


Companies that make armaments need war to be profitable. Constant war is even better, producing an unending flow of money. President George W. Bush's 2002 National Security Strategy is best of all – with its embrace of a vaguely defined preemptive war doctrine and the promise of a series of unilateral wars.

[ . . . ]

The military industrial complex also sustains and feeds off the Bush administration's so-called "global war on terror," or GWOT. Most experts on terrorism would agree that the GWOT is largely a fiction created to simplify a multifaceted problem and heighten fear so that the flow of taxpayer money will continue unabated. Fighting terrorism worldwide, even where it does not exist, isn't cheap, particularly as the increasing reliance on contractors is much more expensive per man-hour than using full-time government employees.


Giraldi estimates that the War on Terror, Inc. has cost the American taxpayer approximately $200 billion since 2001, a figure which does not include military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. He figures that if there are 5,000 "terrorists" worldwide, the American taxpayer forks over an amazing $40 million per "terrorist." To reiterate, that figure does not include Iraq and Afghanistan. Giraldi adds the following observation:


No other country attacks terrorism in such a disproportionate fashion, and many of America's allies have successfully combated it using police and intelligence resources. . . . That's using an elephant to squash a fly. Considering that the fly can move a lot faster than the elephant, no victory is likely to happen soon, apart from the odd "Mission Accomplished" banner here and there.


Having lived and worked in Turkey, Giraldi might appreciate the irony of his remarks if they were spoken with Turkey as the subject instead of the US. According to Ergil, some 40,000 Mehmetciks will be involved in TSK operations in South Kurdistan in order to fight less than 4,000 Kurdish gerîlas which Turkey claims are resident in the South. I recommend a good long read of both articles. Giraldi in particular names names of think-tanks, corporations, and individuals associated with this for-profit orgy instigated by the military-industrial complex--along with Eisenhower's prophetic quote from 1961.

Over at ZNet, Taner Akcam has a recent article in which he explains the situation surrounding his detention by Canadian customs officials in February and the harassment he's undergone from Turkish fascists located in the US. He goes into detail about the efforts of three Gray Wolf organizations against him--the Assembly of Turkish American Associations, Tall Armenian Tale, and Turkish Forum--especially regarding their efforts to paint him as a "terrorist" by posting manufactured and photoshopped propaganda against him on sites like Wikipedia. They even tried to pass Taner Akcam off as a PKK gerîla.

But what does anyone expect of the same type of scum who murdered Hrant Dink?

Theoretically, it's always an honor to be passed off as a gerîla, but it's not so bad to be labeled a "terrorist-communist" either, especially when the labeling is done by the likes of the fascists at ATAA, Tall Armenian Tale, and Turkish Forum, but I understand the practical problems that such a label causes Akcam when dealing with Americans--especially the idiots working at American customs. After all, if it's not on American Idol, Americans don't know anything about it.

A last item also from ZNet, comes from Professor Edward Herman. Compare his piece on mass-murderer Richard Holbrooke with something posted recently on Rastî, about Holbrooke's visit to Maxmur. Keep in mind that Lockheed Martin's Joseph Ralston recently lied in his testimony to Congress regarding Kurds in general and Maxmur in particular. We also have Danny Fried's big lies about Maxmur during the recent US/Turkish attacks against Kurds in Europe.

It's clear that the US policy toward the refugees at Maxmur is to adopt the Ankara regime's lies about the camp being inhabited by "terrorists" and never mind the facts of the situation. The intention of the US is to forcibly repatriate the 11,000 refugees to Turkey as "terrorists."

We all know what that means, don't we?

Saturday, March 24, 2007

NEGLECTING THE PRINCIPLES OF DEMOCRATIZATION

"Those wanting to improve democracy in their countries should not wait for permission."
~ Bulent Ecevit


More on the attempt to dismiss Abdullah Demirbas and dissolve the Sur Municipality by the Ankara regime, from Peace in Kurdistan Campaign. Keep in mind the usual PR that sells the lie of Turkey easing cultural restrictions on Kurds:


Intense legal and administrative pressure on Sur Municipality and Mayor Abdullah Demirbas!


On January 5, 2007, the Turkish Ministry of the Interior appealed to the State Council for the dismissal of Mayor Demirbas and the dissolution of the Sur Municipal Council due to the municipal council’s decision to provide multilingual municipal services for the local public.

On October 6, 2006, the Sur Municipal council approved a decision to provide multilingual municipal services for the local public.1 The proposal on multilingual municipal services had been referred to the Municipal Council Presidency on September 29, 2006 by the Municipal Directorate of Cultural and Social Affairs,2 upon the evaluation of the public survey results3 which stated that 24% of the local residents spoke Turkish in daily life, 72% spoke Kurdish, 1% spoke Arabic and 3% spoke Syriac and Armenian languages. The proposal was first evaluated at the Municipal Commission on Education, Culture, Sports and Tourism. In the commission’s report dated 06.10.20064, “the need for a more participatory understanding of municipal service provision” was emphasized. It was stated that “Surici, our municipal service area, covers the neighborhood wherein majority of the traces belonging to the multireligious and multi-linguistic civilizational heritage in the historic city of Diyarbakir are located…in the light of the scientific data provided [survey results]…in order to provide healthier and better municipal services for the local people and to render educational, cultural and artistic activities locally more accessible…additionally, regarding that the municipal service area is also a touristic site frequently visited by foreign tourists…the proposal for the provision of municipal services in multiple languages hereinafter is determined to be appropriate”. The report was then referred to the Municipal Council, where both the directorate’s proposal and the commission’s report were read, discussed and then approved through a council decision by 17 votes in favor, 7 against and 1 abstention.

According to the registered minutes of the relevant council meeting,5 Mayor of Sur Mr. Abdullah Demirbas stated the following on the aforementioned proposal and the report during the meeting:


“My friends, as you all know, our Municipality is on its way to becoming a touristic city, one of the nominee locations in that sense. Our city, with its 7000 years of history, has hosted many great civilizations in the past. In the current conjuncture, the importance of knowing and speaking multiple languages grows more everyday; and especially for us, the local governments whose duty is to provide services directly to the public, the understanding of multilingual service delivery is even more important. When we look through this perspective, of course our official language is Turkish, nevertheless, I believe that we should not discriminate between our services; and I think that initiating an understanding of multilingual municipal service provision will be beneficial.”


Mayor Demirbas, a teacher himself, is furthermore widely known among the local public for his sensitivity towards educational and cultural issues and for his sincere efforts in the protection and promotion of the rights and lives of children and of the historical, cultural and linguistic richness in his municipal service area. While there are currently two ongoing large-scale EU projects and many small-scale municipal projects towards the renovation and promotion of the multi-ethnic historic and cultural heritage of the Surici district, the Sur Municipality has already pioneered the publication of children’s books and municipal services in multiple languages during the Mayor’s term in office. 6 Furthermore, all these services were met with great public interest and appreciation.

The local, legal and administrative context in which the Ministry of Interior’s action for the dismissal of the Mayor and the dissolution of the Council was taken is very alarming for the local dynamics putting forth effort to promote democracy and cultural freedoms in the region and in Turkey. First of all, to put into practice a form of law enforcement that is fair and impartial and respectful to basic human rights, and one that observes the prevalent values of a society—in short, a form that promotes the rule of law—is one of the basic tenets of good local governance. A very important issue for local democracy is the “principle of proportionality for any administrative regulation or act imposing a limit on self-government”, stipulated in the Article 8 of Charter.7 As noted previously by the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities, it is very important to make sure “that a proper procedure exists, including the rights of the defense, and that careful provision is made in legislation concerning ancillary or principal penalties affecting the actual exercise of elected office”.

According to the existing legislative framework, Ministry of Interior does have the legal right to take an action towards dismissing a locally elected mayor and dissolving the municipal council in certain circumstances. Yet, in a normally or properly working democracy, in the case of a suspected municipal council activity, it is always possible to first initiate a preliminary investigation into the action and proceed through legal and legislative means and ways (e.g. court proceedings), and then consequently to take the action necessitated by the due process. In this case, however, Ministry of Interior directly appealed to the State Council with the inspector’s report, without recourse to the prior legal and legislative process. It should be reminded that in the municipal council’s decision, in accordance with and in limits of the existing law, there is no provision stipulating use of any language other than Turkish in official correspondence.8 Therefore, this issue should be strictly framed through the use and limits of supervisionary powers on the actual exercise of elected office within the context of cultural freedoms.

Overall, the situation facing Mayor Demirbas points to the neglect of the principles of democratization as well as respect for human rights and cultural freedoms that are promoted not only by the European Council but also officially approved by the Turkish government through the European documents such as the Charter of Local Self Government.9 Cases like Mayor Demirbas’ are particularly effective in creating an impression of the arbitrary and unproportionate use of supervisionary powers over elected mayors in the region. The most problematic aspect of these files is not simply the existence of a legal basis for such cases or actions, but the lack of constructive and positive reference to the existing laws.

Especially after the enactment of the new Anti-Terror Law in June 2006, the criminalization of the DTP Mayors’ legal and democratic demands and actions by associating them with the PKK and separatist tendencies has almost become a regular legal and administrative practice. As clearly seen in the sheer number of investigations and court cases launched against DTP mayors,10 the centralist point of view gradually exerts a greater legal, administrative and psychological pressure over the provision of municipal public service in the region. This situation furthermore contradicts Turkey’s ongoing process of democratization and modernization in the context of negotiations with the EU, rendering the much-touted promotion of local democracy dynamics in the region ineffective and non-existent. Within this context, it should also be kept in mind that these perceptions are grounded in a regional history of previously abolished political parties and dismissed mayors and in the context of the current political tension which has led to the detention and/or arrest of almost 70 high level DTP administrators solely within the last two months.

We call upon the international community to recognize the present legal, administrative and psychological pressure exerted over the DTP mayors and the rising political tension in the region. Strongly believing that this situation can be overcome with proper, effective, efficient and immediate implementation of local democracy and local good governance concepts on the ground, we invite the international community to take immediate and effective action to this end.


1 Municipal Council decision no. 61, dated 06.10.2006.
2 File no. M.21.7.Sur.804/307, dated 29.09.2006.
3 In 2006, in order to analyse and evaluate the needs and the life conditions of the local residents of Surici district, a widely representative public survey was conducted by the Sur Municipality. Survey results were later turned into a book published in 3 languages (Turkish, Kurdish and English).
4 Commission Report dated 06.10.2006, undersigned by the head of the commission and 4 other members.
5 Official Records of the Council Meeting, dated 06.10.2006, undersigned by the Mayor and the two clerks.
6 See Appendix 1 for a list of the activities of the Press Unit of the Sur Municipality.
7 Congress Report on Monitoring the Implementation of the European Charter of Local Self-Government, By Alain DELCAMP, European Local Government Association For Research (ELGAR) Paris
8 Sur Mayor and the Municipal Council are indicted on charges of exceeding the bounds and limits of their duties and authorities, and violating the 3rd and the 42nd Articles of the Constitution, which are respectively on the unity of state, on its official language, flag, national anthem and capital city, and on the rights and duties to education.
9 See Appendix 2 for an exemplary list of investigations and court cases launched against the DTP Mayors related to promotion or use of Kurdish on various occasions. Turkey has neither signed the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages of the European Council, of which she is a member, neither the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
10 For example, while Sur Mayor Demirbas has 12 investigations, Diyarbakir Metropolitan Municipality Mayor Osman Baydemir has more than 60 investigations and 7 courts cases launched against him during his 3 years term in office (2004-2007)




Appendix 1: Media and Press Activities of the Sur Municipality

1. Publication of a tri-monthly children’s magazine titled “Semamok”, which has contents both in Turkish and Kurdish. 5000 copies are made and distributed for each issue.

2. Publication and distribution of 8000 copies of a fable in Kurdish.

3. Publication of a book titled ‘’Games and Handicrafts for Children’’ in Turkish and Kurdish, especially regarding the related lack of publications for school age children. Distributed primarily to teachers and parents on the occasion of October 5th Teachers’ Day.

4. Publication of 15.000 promotional brochures on the Surici district in 6 languages, still ongoing distribution in Turkey and abroad.

5. Preparation of a promotional movie on Surici district, titled “A Door of Peoples’’ in three languages (Turkish, Kurdish and English), and its ongoing distribution to local, national and international institutions.

6. Preparation, publication and distribution of the municipal activity and service report for two years in Kurdish and Turkish (2000 copies).

7. Preparation, publication and distribution of a CD on the municipal activity and service report for the two years in Turkish, Kurdish and English (2000 copies).

8. Preparation of the municipal public survey on needs and life conditions of the local residents for publication into a book in 3 languages (Turkish, Kurdish and English); distribution of the 2000 published copies to relevant institutions.

9. Organization of the reception held to launch the first computer operation system in Kurdish, Linux Ubuntu; distribution of 1000 Ubuntu software CDs free of charge; publication of 2000 more copies due to strong public demand.

10. With the project to publish 12 tales book in Kurdish, under the title “One tale for each night”, every month 5000 copies of one tales book will be published and distributed to children and parents. The first of these books will be published this month.


Appendix 2: Some of investigations and court cases launched against the DTP Mayors related to promotion or use of Kurdish on various occasions


* On March 20, 2006, a case was filed against Mayor Demirbas on the grounds of “making propaganda to promote the aims of the terrorist organization PKK” due to his speech titled, “Municipal Services and Local Governments in the light of Multilingualism”, which was delivered at the European Social Forum in January 2006. Although the content of the speech, very well summarized by its title, did not include any single direct or indirect reference to the PKK, as was also later affirmed by the court; the very fact that the speech aimed to explore the relations between multilingualism and local democracy and that it was delivered by a DTP Mayor was enough to render it as a form of ‘PKK propaganda’ in the eyes of central government authorities. Mayor Demirbas was acquitted from all charges on September 19, 2006. Public prosecutor’s consequent appeal to the Supreme Court is still in process.

* On February 7, 2007, following the release of the Kurdish translation of Ubuntu, a free software program available in 167 languages, with the support of Sur Municipality, an investigation was launched against Mayor Demirbas and three municipal administrators on charges of “misuse of municipal resources”.

* On October 10, 2006, Ministry of Interior launched an investigation against Mayor Demirbas due to the children’s games and handicrafts book published by the Sur Municipality. The children’s book, which was written in both Turkish and Kurdish, was published on the occasion of Teacher’s Day.

* In March 2006 an investigation was launched against Mayor Demirbas due to his use Kurdish in his speeches during a wedding ceremony in Diyarbakir.

* On April 19, 2007, Osman Baydemir, Mayor of Diyarbakir Metropolitan Municipality, will appear before the court on charges of violating the law that obliges state agencies, civic groups and private institutions to use Turkish letters. Mayor Baydemir risks 6 to 12 months of imprisonment for using the Kurdish letter “w” in his greetings cards of New Year’s Day. The letter “w”, which exists in the Kurdish alphabet, does not exist in Turkish.

* On April 2, 2007, 56 DTP mayors will appear before court on charges of “abetting and aiding an armed organization” due to their joint letter sent to the Danish Prime Minister Rasmussen concerning the possible closing of Roj TV. Mayors face the risk of 7.5 to 15 years of imprisonment. Currently, local TV stations are permitted to broadcast in Kurdish at most for 45 minutes a day and 5 hours a week in total. In terms of the content, programs are restricted to address only the audience group of adults, and broadcast of language training programs is strictly banned. In terms of the actual broadcast process, TV stations are stipulated to undertake such programming only with the condition of either providing a simultaneous Turkish translation or subtitling during the broadcast or broadcasting the same program in Turkish language immediately after the original broadcast.

* On March 5, 2007, Ministry of Interior sent inspectors to Diyarbakir for a preliminary investigation against Democratic Society Party mayors due to the Newroz invitation cards published in Kurdish and sent to the officials in Turkey.

* In March 2007, a preliminary investigation was launched against Mayor Baydemir due to the publication of public brochures on health and cleanliness in Kurdish and Turkish for local people.

* In March 2007, a preliminary investigation was launched against Mayor Baydemir due to the baby names’ book published in Kurdish.

* On January 17, 2007, an investigation was launched against Mayor Osman Baydemir due to the invitation cards sent to the officials in Turkey. The invitation cards, which were written in both Turkish and Kurdish, were sent on the occasion of the 6th Culture and Arts Festival in Diyarbakir.

* On January 12, 2007, a preliminary investigation was launched against Mayor Osman Baydemir due to the website of Diyarbakir Metropolitan Municipality, which is in Turkish, Kurdish and English.

* With an investigation filed on July 8, 2006, Viransehir Mayor Emrullah Cin was indicted on charges of “misuse of municipal resources” due to publication of bulletins about municipal services both in Turkish and Kurdish. Mayor Cin stated that Kurdish was the mother tongue of the majority of the Viransehir’s population (app. 120.000), thus, in publishing bulletins also in Kurdish, the municipality aimed to better communicate municipal services to the public. Mayor Cin further noted that publication of municipal bulletins was not considered a crime anywhere in Turkey, and that the decision for publication was made by the municipal council and in accordance with the municipal law, and, furthermore, that the RTUK (Radio and Television Supreme Council of Turkey) laws also did not consider publication of such bulletins as a criminal activity, thus municipality acted fully in accordance with and in the limits of existing laws.

* On October 20, 2006, a preliminary investigation was launched against Kayapinar Mayor Zulkuf Karatekin due to the provision 'Municipalities take the necessary precautions to teach their personnel Kurdish in order for them to better communicate with the public” stated in the collective agreement between the municipalities and the Union of Municipal and Local Governments Services Workers.

* Kayapinar Municipal Council’s efforts to give culturally significant Kurdish names to the parks and streets of Diyarbakir were obstructed by the Diyarbakir Governorship because these names were said to either include letters that did not exist in the Turkish alphabet (e.g. ‘w’) or showed parallelism with socially discriminating, separatist discourses. The court case filed by the Kayapinar City Council against the Diyarbakir Governorship is still in process.

* There are investigations against Diyarbakir Metropolitan, Kiziltepe, Sur and Silvan Municipalities opened solely for the use of Kurdish language in public speeches.

Friday, March 23, 2007

DYSFUNCTIONAL DEMOCRACY

"If liberty and equality, as is thought by some, are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in the government to the utmost."
~ Aristotle


Altilim has a nice wrap up of Newroz festivities in Turkey. The headline reads: "Hundred thousands gave general Başbuğ an answer." In case you missed it, Ilker Basbug (Land Forces Commander--Buyukanit's old position and traditionally the position for those Paşas who go on to become the Paşa of Paşas, the Shining Sun Around Which the Turkish Universe Revolves, the Turkish Chief of General Staff) was in Diyarbakir two weeks ago doing his math. Unfortunately, Basbug's math doesn't add up for a number of reasons.

From Altilim:


Hundred thousands gathering at the Newroz rally in Diyarbakir celebrated their feast despite all repression. In Amed, the Kurdish name for the capital of Kurdistan, where general Başbuğ had blared out threats to the people before, Newroz turned into a glamorous celebration. Although a working day, life in the city stopped in the morning and the people entered the place of the rally, called Fuar Alanı.

The rally, in which more than 500.000 people took part, started with Ahmet Türk, Leyla Zana, Osman Baydemir and Musa Farisoğulları, administrative chairman of DTP of Amed, lighting the fire for Newroz.

Despite all threats, a huge poster with the founders of the PKK, such as Kemal Pir, M. Hayri Durmuş, Mazlum Doğan and Abdullah Öcalan and the martyr Zeynep Kınacı was hung up, flags of the confederalism and Öcalan posters were carried. The provocative behaviour of the police, which lasted during the whole rally, later turned into an attack in fact, when the masses were about to disperse. 80 people were arrested in clashes with the police.


Aysel Tugluk had a Newroz message for Ankara (as well as the US and EU):


The leader of Turkey's main pro- Kurdish party warned that the arrest of top party officials during the past month may rekindle separatist violence that has led to thousands of deaths in the past two decades.

The crackdown could also cost Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whose party holds a majority of parliamentary seats in the largely Kurdish southeast, support in elections later this year.

"If our party, which is committed to a peaceful resolution, is unable to function, it says to Kurds that the political arena is shut to them,'' said Aysel Tugluk, co-chairman of the Democratic Society Party or DTP. That may lead Kurdish guerrillas to call off their seven-month unilateral truce as they "assess how effective this cease-fire has been,'' she added.


Read the rest at Bloomberg.


In the spirit of Ms. Tugluk's message, here's a letter from Amed (Diyarbakir) Mayor Osman Baydemir on the controversial possible dismissal of Sur Municipality Mayor Abdullah Demirbas and the dissolution of the Sur Municipal Council, courtesy of the Peace in Kurdistan Campaign (all emphasis mine):


Diyarbakir, March 14 2007


President, USAM and
Mayor, Diyarbakir Metropolitan Municipality


Subject: Possible Dismissal of the Sur Mayor and the Municipal Council


Dear Chief Executive,

The Southeast Anatolia Region is one of the two socio-economically most underdeveloped regions of Turkey, which are heavily populated by Kurdish citizens. Population of the cities such as Diyarbakir and Batman has almost tripled due to the protracted situation of conflict related to the Kurdish problem, and urban life and services in most of the provinces located in the region have been paralyzed. Of course, municipalities located in other regions of Turkey as well are grappling with countless problems in delivering services and contributing to Turkey's democratization process. However, becomes most clear in the East and Southeast Anatolia Regions which have a different cultural life. Municipalities located in these regions have been experiencing heavy tutelage of the central government in most of their activities. In the current context, most people in the region, Turkey's excessively centralist governmental structuremost of whom do not have political representation in the national parliament due to the 10% national election bar, can express their democratic demands and participate in decision-making processes in and through the municipalities. However, the legal and administrative pressures over the municipalities in the region have recently increased significantly. Especially the municipalities who are members of the Democratic Society Party have been subjected to countless investigations, court cases and penalties. As basic constituent elements of local democracy of the region, our municipalities have been put into a dysfunctional situation due to such practices of the central government.

Local governments, particularly the municipalites, are undoubtedly one of the most important channels of a country's democratic life. Fair and good governance requires the inclusion of local demands into the decision-making processes. Due to the national legislation, most municipalities in the region cannot meet the cultural needs of the local people and deliver services in languages other than Turkish. Our municipalities have been receiving demands from the local people concerning the delivery of cultural and awareness building services both in Turkish and in languages other than Turkish. Thus, our Sur Municipality, a district municipality related to Diyarbakir, has been conducting preparatory activities for a while toward this end with a decision taken by the Municipal Council. However, the Ministry of Interior appealed to the State Council to dismiss the Sur Mayor Mr. Abdullah Demirbas and dissolve the Municipal Council on the pretext that Mr. Demirbas and the Municipal Council exceeded the bounds and limits of their duties and authorities and violated the 3rd and 42nd articles of the Constitution.

The attached report was written in order to enable you have an idea about this unfortunate situation that the Sur Municipality is encountering. This approach of the Ministry of Interior to the Sur Mayor and Municipal Council who have acted with a perspective of participatory democracy to meet local demands is an example of the intolerance on the part of the central government toward local democracy and cultural rights. Dismissal of the Sur Mayor and dissolution of the Municipal Council would certainly mean an unacceptable action that would heavily damage local democracy, cultural rights and the relations of confidence between the state and citizens of the region.

We hereby submit this situation of our Sur Municipality to your high attention, evaluation and observation.

Warm regards,

(Signed)
Osman BAYDEMIR


Ps. Please also see the attached “Report on Local Government and Local Democracy Dynamics Concerning the DTP Municipalities in Turkey” prepared by the Democratic Society Party Local Governments Commission to learn more about the pressures on DTP municipalities in Turkey.


Mr. Ulrich BOHNER
Chief Executive
Congress of Local and Regional Authorities
Council of Europe
STRASBOURG
France

cc: Mr. H SKARD, President of the Congress
Directorate General of Local Authorities, Ministry of Interior, Turkey
Union of Municipalities in Turkey










Stay tuned for more from the capital of Kurdistan.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

NEWROZ 2707

NEWROZ 2707 PÎROZ BE!


A masked demonstrator holds a portrait of jailed Kurdish rebel leader Abdullah Ocalan during a gathering to celebrate Newroz in the southeastern Turkish city of Diyarbakir March 21, 2007. REUTERS/Umit Bektas (TURKEY)



Kurdish demonstrators surround a traditional bonfire during a gathering to celebrate Newroz in the southeastern Turkish city of Diyarbakir March 21, 2007. Newroz, which means 'new day' in Kurdish, marks the arrival of spring and is also celebrated in Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, Iran, and Tajikistan. REUTERS/Umit Bektas (TURKEY)


Tens of thousands of Turkish Kurds, with some of them holding flag of outlawed separatist rebel group the Kurdistan Workers Party, PKK, and posters of its jailed leader Abdullah Ocalan chant slogans during the Nowruz celebrations in southeastern Turkish city of Diyarbakir, Wednesday, March 21, 2007. (AP Photo/Burhan Ozbilici)




Turkish Kurds, with one of them holding a poster of the Kurdistan Workers Party's, PKK, (the outlawed separatist rebel group) jailed leader Abdullah Ocalan, shout slogans during the Nowruz celebrations in southeastern Turkish city of Diyarbakir, Wednesday, March 21, 2007. (AP Photo/Burhan Ozbilici)


Demonstrators attend a gathering to celebrate Newroz in southeastern Turkish city of Diyarbakir March 21, 2007. REUTERS/Umit Bektas (TURKEY)




A Kurdish girl poses during a gathering to celebrate Newroz in the southeastern Turkish city of Diyarbakir March 21, 2007. REUTERS/Umit Bektas (TURKEY)




Pro-Kurdish former lawmaker Leyla Zana addresses the people during a gathering to celebrate Newroz in the southeastern Turkish city of Diyarbakir March 21, 2007. REUTERS/Umit Bektas (Turkey)



Tens of thousands of Turkish Kurds, some of them holding posters of outlawed rebel group jailed leader Abdullah Ocalan, shout slogans during the Nowruz celebrations in southeastern Turkish city of Diyarbakir, Wednesday, March 21, 2007. (AP Photo/Burhan Ozbilici)



Demonstrators hold portraits of jailed Kurdish rebel leader Abdullah Ocalan during a gathering to celebrate Newroz in the southeastern Turkish city of Diyarbakir March 21, 2007. REUTERS/Umit Bektas (TURKEY)



Tens of thousands of Turkish Kurds, some of them holding flags of a outlawed separatist rebel group and posters of its jailed leader Abdullah Ocalan during the Nowruz celebrations in southeastern Turkish city of Diyarbakir, Wednesday, March 21, 2007. (AP Photo/Burhan Ozbilici)


A masked man stands among demonstrators during an open air meeting by thousands of Kurds celebrating Newroz (new year or the beginning of spring) in Istanbul March 21, 2007. REUTERS/Osman Orsal (TURKEY)


Turkish riot police detain a Kurdish demonstrator in Istanbul, Turkey, Wednesday, March 21, 2007. (AP Photo/Murad Sezer)


Police detain a protester during clashes after a gathering by thousands of Kurds celebrating Newroz in Istanbul March 21, 2007. REUTERS/Osman Orsal(TURKEY)



Turkish riot police detain a Kurdish demonstrator in Istanbul, Turkey, Wednesday, March 21, 2007. Authorities increased security around the country for Wednesday's Nowruz festival and warned they would not tolerate illegal demonstrations. But protesters carried pictures of rebel leader Abdullah Ocalan and flags of his banned separatist Kurdistan Workers Party, or PKK, despite laws banning rebel propaganda. Police fired tear gas to disperse a group who threw stones at police at the end of festivities in Istanbul and detained more than 20 people. (AP Photo/Murad Sezer)



A man flees from a baton-charging riot police officer after an open air meeting by thousands of people to celebrate Newroz (new year or the beginning of spring) in Istanbul, March 21, 2007. REUTERS/Fatih Saribas (TURKEY)



Turkish riot police chase Kurdish protesters through a tunnel under a railway station in Istanbul March 21, 2007, during a gathering held by thousands of Kurds to celebrate Newroz (new year or the beginning of spring). REUTERS/Fatih Saribas (TURKEY)


Turkish riot police take shelter behind their shields to protect themselves from stones thrown by demonstrators in Istanbul March 21, 2007, during a gathering held by thousands of people to celebrate Newroz (new year or the beginning of spring). REUTERS/Fatih Saribas (TURKEY)



Smoke from tear gas shells is seen in the air as Turkish riot police take shelter behind their shields to protect themselves from stones thrown by demonstrators in Istanbul March 21, 2007. REUTERS/Fatih Saribas (TURKEY)

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

NEWROZ PREPARATIONS

"In Kurdish legend, the holiday celebrates the deliverance of the Kurds from a tyrant, and it is seen as another way of demonstrating support for the Kurdish cause."
~ Wikipedia, "Newroz as celebrated by Kurds."




A masked protester jumps over a fire during a demonstration in Istanbul March 18, 2007. The demonstration was held to support Abdullah Ocalan, the jailed leader of illegal Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), who is currently serving a life sentence. REUTERS/Osman Orsal (TURKEY)



Police detain a protester after a demonstration in Istanbul March 18, 2007. REUTERS/Osman Orsal (TURKEY)


There's been a lot of nationalist activity in Turkey in the last week, and it's specifically directed toward the Kurdish new year, Newroz. Last year, Turkish media worked itself into a frenzy with its usual predictions of violence during Newroz, but the violence didn't come to pass during the holiday. This being an election year in Turkey, the nationalist activity directed against Newroz is, in reality, another excuse to round up DTP politicians, and has become an issue for anti-"terrrorism" boards, from TDN:


Weary of Kurdish groups' wide demonstrations and protests, the Turkish government is preparing to take measures to prevent violent acts during the Nevruz festival on March 21. An anti-terrorism board met yesterday, here, to review the security measures to be taken especially in the cities of southeastern Anatolia and in big cities like Istanbul and Ankara.


It never entered the thick heads of the Ankara fascists that maybe Kurds are weary of having to demonstrate, protest, and engage in legitimate armed resistance in order to gain the right to be treated as human beings. There's a bit of double-speak used here, though, because "to review security measures to be taken" against Newroz demonstrations can be translated to mean: "prepare provocations against the Kurdish people." That's what security forces did after Newroz last year, during the funeral of HPG gerîlas in Amed.


Turkish security forces started operations against PKK members and supporters in February. Yesterday, the DTP's head of Mardin, Ferhan Türk, had been arrested.

Human Right of Association (İHD), in a press announcement issued yesterday, criticized the measures taken by the security forces against DTP members. İHD the government of its responsibility for the arrests against the DTP mayors in Van, Diyarbakır, Batman and Mardin.


Over fifty DTP leaders have been arrested in the last couple of weeks, with at least two Wan DTP officials, Ibrahim Sunkur and Abdulvahap Turhan, having been incarcerated in Wan's F-Type prison.

Another interesting nationalist development:


After the Ministers Council on Monday, government spokesman Cemil Çiçek announced the Nevroz festival will be celebrated by the state, as before. He expressed the desire of celebrating Nevruz as a day of friendship, peace and brotherhood.


So, they are going to celebrate Newroz as a state, "as before." Since PKK first came onto the scene in 1984, Newroz in Turkish-occupied Kurdistan has become very politicized. Unable to overcome the politicization of the Kurdish population, and frustrated by the inability to forcibly assimilate Kurds, the state took a different tack and decided to declare that Newroz was, in reality, an ancient Turkish holiday. The ultra-fascist Turkish-Islamists fabricated an entire history around Newroz in an attempt to dilute the importance of the holiday for Kurds, as reported by Asylum Aid in 2000:


The State and its officials remain nervous and inconsistent regarding Kurdish expression. Celebration of the Kurdish New Year, Newroz, on 21 March is a classic example. With the active encouragement of the PKK, Newroz became more than the ancient Iranian cultural tradition it had always been. It became the major annual expression of Kurdish cultural nationalism, and by 1992 was accompanied by civilian casualties as the security forces tried to stifle the expression of popular feeling. In 1995 the State bowed to the inevitable and sought to co-opt the festival by declaring it a national holiday on the mendacious grounds that it was a Turkish tradition. From 1995, Newroz has been accompanied by much putting out of Turkish flags. It was a clever and partially successful move, but it does not imply tolerance of Newroz as a Kurdish event, and those who sport Kurdish colours (red, green and yellow) are still liable to be arrested and beaten up, be it at Newroz or some other time of the year.

[ . . . ]

Because of the capture of Abdullah Ocalan Newroz in 1999 was particularly critical. The Turkish security forces took extreme methods of control. Some 8,000 persons were detained, 1,700 of them in Istanbul alone. An revealing little example of continuing State nervousness was the press report concerning Newroz 2000 in Batman. Six local newspapers in Batman were under investigation, it said, for spelling 'Newroz' the Kurdish way rather than the Turkish way of 'Nevroz'.


It looks like the state is viewing election year 2007 as equally critical, especially since reports of Ocalan's poisoning have already inflamed "The Region." As far as the manufacuring of Newroz into an ancient Turkish holiday goes, even Ilnur Cevik admitted as much last year:


In recent years the Turkish authorities decided that Nevruz was an ancient Turkish festivity and that it should be celebrated all over Turkey, not just in the areas dominated by our citizens of Kurdish origin. Turkish authorities started organizing special celebrations where many prominent personalities jumped over bonfires, as the tradition requires. Of course these so-called festivities were completely artificial and lacked any kind of public support.


But the "completely artificial" Turkish Nevroz (as opposed to Kurdish Newruz--remember the "W" is forbidden) will be the order of the day this year, as the Paşas have determined. Given that this year we have witnessed the Deep State murder of Hrant Dink; that a Turkish professor is facing charges of insulting Ataturk; that extremist nationalism is praised and the resulting violence is thereby encouraged; that Erdogan is trying to outdo everyone in nationalist sentiment in the battle for Cankaya; that 50-kilo mega-flags are considered the proper response to Kurds who wave red, yellow, and green hankies; and that BBP, the people who brought you Ogun Samast, is proclaiming "brotherhood," "peace," and "love," and a general warm, fuzzy feeling for Kurds, means that it will be an interesting Newroz.

On Monday, the DTP mayor of Colemerg (Hakkari), Metin Tekce, was sentenced to seven years in prison for saying what we all know to be true: PKK is not a terrorist organization. DTP's Amed (Diyarbakir) provinicial chairman, Hilmi Aydogdu, is looking at three years for "inciting hatred." Imagine how many years the Turkish government would get if it applied its own law to itself.

Newsflash: Ankara and DC have a bit of a disagreement over Maxmur. What this article means is the the US is prepared to sacrifice the lives of well over 10,000 Kurdish refugees to bribe Turkey into not invading South Kurdistan. This is a move by Washington to protect its oil interests in Kerkuk. There's also some information about Turkish military developments in its Kurdish colony. More on that, too, here.

No doubt the current environment will give the Deep State the excuse it needs to engage in Newroz provocations against the Kurdish people.

Stay tuned.

Monday, March 19, 2007

MORE ON RALSTON'S LIES TO CONGRESS

It's pathetic, pathetic, when Turkish NTV speaks the truth, for a change, about a Kurdish refugee camp, while a Lockheed Martin director sits there in front of Congress and lies his ass off about it.

Here's one:


Ralston: Ammunition was found at Mahmour camp in N. Iraq

US and Iraqi troops searched the Mahmour refugee camp in northern Iraq in January.

WASHINGTON - Contradicting earlier statements on a search carried out by US troops in the Mahmour refugee camp in northern Iraq, US Special envoy to combat PKK terrorism Joseph Ralston said that ammunition had been found.

In an exclusive interview with the Associated Press agency, Ralston, a retired US air force general, said that they believed that ammunition could have belonged to the PKK.

Ralston said that the US, Turkey and Iraq were close to reaching an agreement over closing down Mahmour camp, which Ankara has long said has been a base for the PKK.

The retired general added that it was because of America’s pressure that both Iraqi and European officials had taken measures against PKK.

After the troops searched the camp the local Kurdish authorities and United Nations officials declared that no weapons or ammunition had been found.


Here's two:


UNHCR deny arms found in Mahmour Camp

The US Special Envoy to combat terrorism Joseph Ralston said that ammunition was found at Mahmour in northern Iraq, despite previous statements denying that any cache had been uncovered.

ISTANBUL - A spokesman for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) has denied claims that weapons were found at a refugee camp in northern Iraq that Turkey says houses members of the terrorist group the PKK.

Speaking on television station NTV Friday, UNHCR spokesman for Turkey Metin Corabatir said that a search of the Mahmour Camp last month by US and Iraqi troops had not found any arms or ammunition.

However, some shells without fuses had been found well away from the camp in remote areas.

“It was the refugee children from the camp that showed that location,” Corabatir said.

The observer representing the US at the tripartite meetings held in Geneva to discuss Mahmour had confirmed the civilian nature of the camp, he said.

Corabatir added that they were looking into finding sustainable solution for refugees in order to be able to close down the camp.


And there's more in Turkish for those so inclined.

And a little reminder from IHD's press release on the raid:


As a result of UN s control decreasing and Turkey's permanent allegation that Maxmur Camp is under the control of armed militants; UN High Commissioner for Refugees asked Iraq Authorities to raid in the camp and determine whether there is any armed person/group or not.. Moreover, UNHCR asked for paralyzing armed person/group if there is any. After this demand; Iraq Authorities raided Maxmur Refugee Camp yesterday. America, actually invasion forces also sent a representative, who is Denmark, to this raid. According to the information that we learned raid carried out in a professional manner and officers did not find any weapons.

All of the evidences show that raid was a routine implementation.

Therefore;

1) Broadcasting such an ordinary raid as an operation against terrorism is totally wrong. Actually raids, in such camps, are frequently carried out. Speculating on such persons, who had to leave from their homeland and became refugee violates right news principle and are against refugee law-human rights.

2) Refugee Camp was identified, in much news, as "PKK s Maxmur Camp". Such identification caused, even involuntarily, a misconception about these people, whose numbers are over 10.000 and disadvantaged group. As a result of this misconception; they were considered at least as members of illegal organization and became target in the society.


Spreading "Turkey's permanent allegation" is exactly what Ralston did in Congress last week, all for the sake of the military-industrial complex and the Deep State, of which he is a part.

Remember the ideology:


The idea that Strauss was a great defender of liberal democracy is laughable. I suppose that Strauss’s disciples consider it a noble lie. Yet many in the media have been gullible enough to believe it.

How could an admirer of Plato and Nietzsche be a liberal democrat? The ancient philosophers whom Strauss most cherished believed that the unwashed masses were not fit for either truth or liberty, and that giving them these sublime treasures would be like throwing pearls before swine. In contrast to modern political thinkers, the ancients denied that there is any natural right to liberty. Human beings are born neither free nor equal. The natural human condition, they held, is not one of freedom, but of subordination – and in Strauss’s estimation they were right in thinking so.


If throwing over 10,000 Kurdish refugees, who were driven from their homes and villages by a NATO army, to the (Gray) wolves will secure more Lockheed deals and create a warm, fuzzy feeling between the three key states of the Deep State--the US, Turkey, and Israel--then that's exactly what vermin like Ralston and Wexler are going to do. After all, these "unwashed masses" were born "neither free nor equal" under Turkish occupation.

Pathetic.

LOCKHEED'S JOSEPH RALSTON LIES TO CONGRESS

“Money, not morality, is the principle commerce of civilized nations.”
~ Thomas Jefferson.



Last week, Lockheed Martin's "special envoy" to "coordinate" the PKK for Turkey, Joseph Ralston testified before the House Foreign Affairs Committee Subcommittee on Europe. In his testimony, he lies by selectivity or outright, so let's go through his statement and pick it apart.


Chairman Wexler, Congressman Gallegly, Members of the Sub-Committee, it is an honor to speak to you today about my efforts during the past six months to address the significant threat posed to our long-standing ally Turkey by the PKK (the Kurdistan Workers Party), including its impact on Turkey's relations with Iraq and the potential for Turkish cross-border action. This conflict has endured for more than twenty years and the resulting violence led in the last year alone to the deaths of 600 Turkish citizens. The continued ability of this terrorist group to operate from Iraqi territory is a threat to regional security and an impediment to improvements in the lives of people on both sides of the border.


It's amazing that a relative few thousands of Kurdish gerîlas can pose a "significant threat" to the 800,000-strong TSK, NATO's second largest standing army. It's amazing that Kurdish gerîlas have done so for over twenty years without the 800,000-strong TSK being able to do a damned thing about it, and that's with billions of dollars worth of military toys from the US, including Joseph Ralston's very own Lockheed Martin. After twenty years, the alleged deaths of 600 Turkish citizens averages out to just under 30 people per year. Good US ally Turkey, on the other hand has murdered 40,000 Kurds, ostensibly considered to be "citizens" of Turkey by Turkey, but Ralston does not include them in his body count. If we average out the the number of Kurds murdered by TSK over the same amount of time, we see that almost 2,000 Kurds have been murdered annually by the Turkish state.

Who's the terrorist here?

If PKK poses a "significant" threat to "regional security and [is] an impediment to improvements in the lives of the people on both sides of the border," then why hasn't regional security gone to hell earlier during the past 22 years? During the last unilateral PKK ceasefire, which lasted for six years, what was the Turkish government's "impediment to improvements in the lives of the people" on its side of the border? The sole impediment which caused Turkey to do nothing to repair the damage it caused during 80+ years of occupation is Turkey's racist policies toward the Kurdish people and its attempts at genocide of the Kurdish people. When given the opportunity, Turkey did nothing to improve the lives of its so-called citizens residing in "The Southeast."

It should also be noted that the single most serious threat to regional stability was the invasion of Iraq by the US in 2003 and continued US threats against the Iran. This threat to regional stability was not done to secure a few, limited cultural rights for anyone, nor was it undertaken to spread "democracy"; it was done to secure US interests, i.e. oil.

Is Ralston merely stupid or is he a liar?


Recently, the PKK has sought to hide its terrorist roots by cloaking its political demands in terms of local cultural and linguistic rights.


Wrong. PKK has offered a complete platform to politicize the entire peace process for Kurds in Turkey so that Kurds are able to possess full political rights (which include simple cultural and linguistic rights). All of the points of the platform are completely consistent with EU accession but this process, along with the current ceasefire, were dismissed out of hand by both the Ankara and Washington regimes. Ralston doesn't stop to think that it would seem ridiculous for a relative few thousand gerîlas, coupled with the support of almost 20 million Kurds under Turkish occupation, to continue the fight if the fight were just for a few "local cultural and linguistic rights." There is something much more serious going on here, in order to keep the entire population in a state of resistance to the regime, and that something is called "genocide."

Is Ralston merely stupid or is he a liar?


In 2004 the PKK resumed terrorist attacks against Turkish security forces, innocent civilians and foreign tourists.


Ralston wants us to believe he's unable to tell the difference between PKK operations and other operations, like TAK operations. In reality, Ralston knows the difference very well, but he's spreading the propaganda of his friends in the ruling military oligarchy which, in turn, serves to justify Ralston's tactical fighter aircraft sales to the same buddies.

Is Ralston merely stupid or is he a liar?


Its actions have been criticized by human rights groups such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.


Criticisms of atrocities committed by the Turkish government fill many more volumes than any of those committed by members of PKK, yet this fact is not brought up by Ralston. Even the relatively useless US State Department human rights report overwhelmingly lists Turkish atrocities by the US and NATO-trained and armed TSK.

Is Ralston merely stupid or is he a liar?


The conflict with the PKK has diverted Turkey's effort to join the EU and has fostered instead a permanent state of alarm throughout the country. Badly needed outside investment cannot be productively used to shore up underdeveloped south-eastern Turkey until the threat of terrorism recedes. Ironically, the continued existence of a terrorist group that cloaks itself in the mantle of Kurdish rights has impeded the progress for which Turkish Kurds aspire through economic development and the cooperation facilitated by EU human rights law.


Turkey began its EU process in the 1950s. PKK didn't begin operations until 1984. What "diverted Turkey's efforts" in the thirty-four years before PKK arrived on the scene? Again we have had a six-year unilateral ceasefire (PKK operations did not resume until 2005), and in that time, Turkey did nothing to repair the damage it inflicted on North Kurdistan even though there was plenty of opportunity to do so, including cultivating "[b]adly needed outside investment." Again, Turkey did nothing. The EU has also had plenty of opportunity to become involved in the Kurdish situation and to use EU human rights law to further concrete steps to Kurdish equality but, like Turkey, it did nothing. The EU has absolutely no intention of furthering Kurdish rights or equality, nor does the EU, Turkey, or the US have any right to force its economic system on the people of Turkish-occupied Kurdistan.

We see how that system is working in South Kurdistan. Privatization and globalization mean exploitation. In South Kurdistan we have seen basic services deteriorate to a neanderthal level for ordinary people, and while the poor get poorer, the rich get richer and foreign investment does nothing but serve the interests of the KDP and PUK. This is an excellent lesson for the people of Turkish-occupied Kurdistan and Osman Baydemir has it right when he says that local resources should be administered locally--not by a centralized fascist regime nor by greedy foreign investors. But how can we expect a member of the board of directors of Lockheed Martin to understand this?

Is Ralston merely stupid or is he a liar?


Several thousand PKK terrorists are based just over the Turkish border inside Iraq. The PKK has used Iraq as a base to pursue operations, train terrorists, and direct attacks against Turkey. Iraqi and U.S. forces have lacked the resources to root out this pocket of terrorist camps despite the continued insistence of Turkish authorities.


Several thousand PKK gerîlas are located inside Turkey itself. Turkey and Ralston say the contrary because it is Turkey's intention to reclaim the Mosul Vilayet. Turkey has sent tens of thousands of troops into South Kurdistan numerous times during the 1990s to "root out this pocket" of gerîla camps but has always failed in its efforts--in spite of US and NATO weaponry and training. Iraqi forces are too incompetent for a real fight and US forces are too lazy to engage in mountain combat. I mean, they'd actually have to get out of their humvees and hump it over those mountains the old-fashioned way if they were ordered to engage Kurdish gerîlas.

On top of that, the product which Ralston sells, the F-16, was used extensively by the Ankara regime to bomb Southern Kurdish villages repeatedly in the 1990s during Operation Northern Watch, an operation which is propagandized as "protection" or providing "safe haven" for the Kurds.

Is Ralston merely stupid or is he a liar?


We have reached a critical point in which the pressure of continued attacks has placed immense public pressure upon the Government of Turkey to take some military action. Ankara understands that military action, even within this small pocket of Iraq, could be potentially destabilizing and counter-productive to our joint goal of achieving a stable and strong Iraqi government.


We have reached a "critical point" because Ralston's buddies in the Deep State have fueled the Turkish nationalist monster through its media campaign, its educational system, and its state institutions--thus proving that Turkey has really changed nothing as far as the Copenhagen Criteria go. Since 1923 there have been three Kurdish uprisings against the fascist Ankara regime and twenty "pacification" efforts against Kurds by the regime. In every one of those efforts, military action has failed. What will be the point of further military action, except to enrich the vermin of the US military-industrial complex--of which Ralston is one--and the business interests of the Paşas? The only solution is a political solution as PKK has already offered.

Anyone who thinks differently is either merely stupid or is a liar.


In August 2006, Secretary Rice asked me to undertake the mission of Special Envoy for Countering the PKK. My appointment followed a period of two weeks in which the Turks seemed poised to cross the Iraq border on a mission to root out PKK fighters and destroy their camps. I was given responsibility for coordinating U.S. engagement with the Government of Turkey and the Government of Iraq to eliminate the terrorist threat of the PKK operating in northern Iraq and across the Turkey-Iraq border.


At the end of August, 2006, to be exact, less than a month after the filing period for the first half of the year ended, during which time Ralston was listed with the Senate as a lobbyist for Lockheed Martin, to sell tactical fighter aircraft:






Of course, if PKK is really a bunch of "terrorists," then why the objection to Turkey participating in the global War on Terror®? If Turkey is such a good ally of the US, why doesn't the US allow it to join the coalition? The alternative is to negotiate a political solution, which has been rejected. So the US is not interested in finding any solution to the so-called terrorist threat. Why? Think: Almighty Dollar.


Turkey is a sovereign state with a responsibility to defend its people. Ultimately, the Turkish government will have to take the steps it thinks are necessary to protect its citizens. Over the past six months we have explored what options are available with the Iraqis and Turks to remove the threat posed by this terrorist organization and restore peace to the border zone. Maintaining a peaceful border between Turkey and Iraq is important to our efforts to continue the reconstruction and development of Iraq. My goal was to come up with a set of actions that the U.S. Government, the Turkish government and the Iraqi government could take to eliminate the PKK threat.


If Turkey has a responsibility to defend its people, then we should define who those people are. Kurds are not Turks, so are they considered Turkey's "people?" If Turkey has a responsibility to defend its citizens, which Turkey claims that Kurds are, then why does Turkey genocide its citizens? What responsibility does Turkey have to protect its citizens, even if they are Kurds? Why does Turkey fail to prosecute security forces that murder, torture, and generally repress its citizens?

Another thing, why is it that the Ralston and the US ignore the very people with whose lives they are meddling--the Kurds of Turkish-occupied Kurdistan themselves? Why are they not included as part of Ralston's shuttle diplomacy? Why has DTP, which is the only legal representation of Kurds under Turkish repression, not been included, but KDP and PUK have? I mean, DTP has never been mentioned in connection with any of this.

Is Ralston merely stupid or is he a liar?


I have made half-dozen trips to Turkey and also met with Turkish officials in Europe and the United States. I met not only with Prime Minister Erdogan, Foreign Minister Gul, and the chief of the Turkish General Staff, but also with the Interior Minister of the Turkish National Police and intelligence organizations. Since last September, I have been to Iraq three times and again had meetings with President Talabani, the Vice President, the Prime Minister, the Foreign Minister, and the Defense Minister, as well as with President Barzani of the Kurdish Regional Government in Erbil.

[ . . . ]

In conjunction with counterparts, General Edip Baser and Iraqi Minister of State for Security al-Waili, we have tried to achieve movement on a series of steps that have to be taken by all three governments to be more effective in countering the PKK.

[ . . . ]

In general, we have successfully increased the amount of communication between the Turks and Iraqis. It is essential to the improvement of the situation that more and better channels of communication can be developed.


See? No DTP mentioned. Why is that? None of the other people involved in this high-level goat-screw have any business speaking for the people of Turkish-occupied Kurdistan. Not Erdogan, not Gul, not Buyukanit. Not any Turkish police types. Not Talabani, not Barzani, not al-Maliki, not Zebari. Not US officials, not EU officials. Only DTP and PKK have any legitimacy to speak for Northern Kurds. Why have they not been consulted?

Is Ralston merely stupid or is he a liar?


Movement toward closure of the Makhmour refuge camp, which had become a refuge for PKK fighters in the safety of northern Iraq. An agreement structuring the voluntary return of Makhmour camp residents to Turkey and on the camp's disposition is being worked out between Turkey, Iraq, and the UNHCR. Practical steps have had to be dealt with. The camp needed to be cleared of any PKK personnel, all the arms needed to be removed from the camp, UNHCR needed to register every person in the camp -- man, woman, and child -- and everyone in the camp needed to be interviewed to determine their intention to return to Turkey or to remain in Iraq. All of this, except the survey of intentions, has been accomplished. We will continue to work with UNHCR, the Turks and the Iraqis on how to close the camp and what sort of assistance will be needed to encourage the residents to either repatriate or resettle.

On March 5, the three parties held their most recent trilateral meeting to discuss the closure of the camp. Although the discussion did not finalize the agreement, they made substantive progress.


The US itself raided Maxmur in January and not a single bullet was found, but here is Liar Ralston in Congress, saying that "[t]he camp needed to be cleared of any PKK personnel" and "all the arms needed to be removed from the camp." But there were no arms. There was no mention of any "PKK personnel." The UN census proved the civilian nature of the camp, in spite of State Department liars claiming the contrary. The former State Department murderer Richard Holbrooke went to Maxmur and still there were no reports of "PKK personnel" or weapons, and State Department liar, Daniel Fried, then repeated Turkey's lies about Maxmur.

Here we finally have an answer to our question of whether Ralston is merely stupid or if he's a liar. He's a liar.

Of course, the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Subcommittee on Europe probably wants to be lied to when it comes to Turkey. Congressman Robert Wexler founded the Congressional Turkey Caucus, won a "leadership" award from the ATC, all for the sake of Israel. He even participates in the ATC's annual conference. But that may be because he's heavily involved with the ATC, as is Joe Ralston himself.

Yet Wexler recognizes a political solution with Hamas.

What's in Wexler's wallet? Inquiring minds wanna know.

Sunday, March 18, 2007

NEXUS OF EVIL, PART 2

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
~ Franklin D. Roosevelt.


Today I have a round-up of some of Luke Ryland's latest work on the campaign to get a public, open congressional hearing on the Sibel Edmonds' case, in order to break open the Deep State in the US. For starters, here's a transcript of former CIA Istanbul deputy chief of base, Philip Giraldi, lifted from the pages of American Conservative magazine and carried on Stress:


Sibel Edmonds, the Turkish FBI translator turned whistleblower who has been subjected to a gag order could provide a major insight into how neoconservatives distort US foreign policy and enrich themselves at the same time. On one level, her story appears straightforward: several Turkish lobbying groups allegedly bribed congressmen to support policies favourable to Ankara. But beyond that, the Edmonds revelations become more serpentine and appear to involve AIPAC, Israel and a number of leading neoconservatives who have profited from the Turkish connection. Israel has long cultivated a close relationship with Turkey since Ankara’s neighbours and historic enemies - Iran, Syria and Iraq - are also hostile to Tel Aviv. Islamic Turkey has also had considerable symbolic value for Israel, demonstrating that hostility to Muslim neighbours is not a sine qua non for the Jewish state.

Turkey benefits from the relationship by securing general benevolence and increased aid from the US Congress - as well as access to otherwise unattainable military technology. The Turkish General Staff has a particular interest because much of the military spending is channeled through companies in which the generals have a financial stake, making for a very cozy and comfortable business arrangement. The commercial interest has also fostered close political ties, with the American Turkish Council, American Turkish Cultural Alliance and the Assembly of Turkish American Associations all developing warm relationships with AIPAC and other Jewish and Israel advocacy groups throughout the US.

Someone has to be in the middle to keep the happy affair going, so enter the neocons, intent on securing Israel against all comers and also keen to turn a dollar. In fact the neocons seem to have a deep and abiding interest in Turkey, which, under other circumstances, might be difficult to explain. Doug Feith’s International Advisors Inc, a registered agent for Turkey in 1989 - 1994, netted $600,000 per year from Turkey, with Richard Perle taking $48,000 annually as a consultant. Other noted neoconservatives linked to Turkey are former State Department number three, Marc Grossman, current Pentagon Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Eric Edelman, Paul Wolfowitz and former congressman Stephen Solarz. The money involved does not appear to come from the Turkish government, and FBI investigators are trying to determine its source and how it is distributed. Some of it may come from criminal activity, possibly drug trafficking, but much more might come from arms dealing. Contracts in the hundreds of millions, or even billions of dollars provide considerable fat for those well placed to benefit. Investigators are also looking at Israel’s particular expertise in the illegal sale of US military technology to countries like China and India. Fraudulent end-user certificates produced by Defense Ministries in Israel and Turkey are all that is needed to divert military technology to other, less benign, consumers. The military-industrial-complex/neocon network is also well attested. Doug Feith has been associated with Northrup Grumman for years, while defense contractors fund many neocon-linked think tanks and “information” services. Feith, Perle and a number of other neocons have long had beneficial relationships with various Israeli defense contractors.


Regarding Giraldi's comments, the money coming from arms deals should be noted, because this is a fact about Ralston's appointment as "PKK coordinator" that I've tried to make for months. The Deep Staters don't give a damn about negotiating a political solution to end Turkish repression of the Kurdish people, not do they care about spreading "democracy" or "stability" in the Middle East (Remember in what regard neocon ideology holds the vast majority of the world's population: "And they are certainly not too concerned about the happiness of mere mortals. They have little pity or compassion for them. On the contrary, the pain, suffering, and tragedies of the mortals provide them with entertainment.").

For more on Giraldi, Luke conducted an interview with one of the directors of Sibel's documentary, Kill The Messenger. Here's a portion of Luke's interview with director Mathieu Verboud:


LR: OK, Philip Giraldi now. What did he have to say?

MV: Philip Giraldi appears in the last chapter of the film. Giraldi is the one who connects the final dots. He was stationed in Turkey in the 80s for the CIA. He knows the players in the game. He recently published a remarkable article in the American Conservative on Sibel’s case. Giraldi obviously understood most of what was to be understood about it.

As explained before, Giraldi knows the reason why there was a military relationship between Turkey and Israel for the last 30 years - Turkey wanting to get access to weapons in the US and Israel being interested in becoming friendly with a Muslim country. That's the starting point.

Beyond that, he understands the role of the Military Industrial Complex, both in the US and in Israel and Turkey - for example, Turkish Generals retain commissions on the works and the production lines of the Turkish arms manufacturing companies - in other words, baksheesh.

Giraldi then pointed to the neocons who are intertwined in the U.S-Turkey-Israel triangle and also insists on the fact that these people have been connected to the Turkish government, Israeli arms companies and the Military Industrial Complex in the U.S, as he says "making money, doling out influence."

Giraldi also insisted very specifically about the FBI investigations on Feith and Perle and some others. The belief we had before meeting Giraldi was that Turkey recruited the ‘crème de la crème’ of Israel's friends in the U.S, so that they would then have access to not only Washington’s officials, but also to the Pentagon and its most hi-tech weaponry. Giraldi confirmed that.

LR: In his article, Giraldi says that the false end-user certificates were used by Israel and Turkey to provide weapons to both China and India - I hadn't heard of India being involved.

MV: Well, in the 1990’s, it is well known that Israel has sold China sensitive U.S military technology. For almost two decades now, China and Israel have spied on the U.S more than any other country in the world. In the film, Philip Giraldi states that the FBI does an annual compilation of who spies most on the U.S. As he says : "The result is always the same: number one is China, number two is Israel. "

India is a different story. In Sibel’s case, some witnesses fingered the ‘India’ component, but for reasons already mentioned we didn’t go further (laughs)… By the way, if you look at the Giza case, it’s public record that the Israeli broker Asher Karni was also selling the nuclear detonators he got from Giza to India.


Regarding the sale of "sensitive U.S. military technology" to China, Lockheed Martin has been in trouble for doing just that. Of course, the State Department didn't seek criminal sanctions against Lockheed Martin, but only civil penalties. It simply would not do to criminalize a major corporation that is part of the US foreign policy-making process.

Luke has a new post today in his diary at Daily Kos, in which he outlines and discusses the main issues behind Sibel's case. I'm stealing most of it here, but for the entire post, including congressional contact links, see the diary:


**********


Former FBI translator and whistleblower Sibel Edmonds discovered massive criminality when she was at the FBI and was told to shut up. Sibel is the most gagged person in US history. We're in the final days of a campaign, Let Sibel Edmonds Speak, to demand that Henry Waxman hold hearings into her case and the State Secrets Privilege.

Because Sibel is gagged, and because her case is complicated, it can be difficult to understand of all the different elements. In this post, I will lay out the most simple of the issues that Sibel raised - espionage in the FBI translation department - and why it is still important today (hint: a confirmed 'mole'/foreign agent is in charge of all Arabic translators at the FBI.)

In other words, I hope that you can send this diary to your friends and family - people who may not be involved in politics, people who have never heard of Sibel - and they are sufficiently outraged that they can't wait to call Waxman on Monday morning and demand hearings.

The reason they should be outraged is because America is more likely to be attacked because of the information in this diary.

Last week, more than 30 'good-government' groups from across the political spectrum petitioned Henry Waxman to hold hearings into Sibel Edmonds' case.

From the petition:

The issues that were reported by Ms. Edmonds include:

• Cases of espionage activities within the FBI...
• Cases of cover-up of information and leads pre and post 9/11, under the excuse of protecting certain diplomatic relations
• Cases of intentional blocking and mistranslation of crucial intelligence by FBI translators and management


Today I want to describe exactly what she's talking about regarding espionage at the FBI translation unit, and prove that we are all less safe because the problems have not been rectified - in fact, the problems are much worse today.

When Sibel Edmonds joined the FBI immediately after 911, she was the first and only Turkish translator there. Shortly afterwards, the FBI recruited two other translators, Melek Can Dickerson and Kevin Taskasen. Their boss was former translator Mike Feghali.

Let's dispense with Kevin Taskasen first, because he isn't particularly important in the scheme of things, although his situation does demonstrate the massive incompetence and cronyism in the translation department. Taskasen failed two language proficiency exams, English and Turkish, but his wife worked at the FBI's language testing center so... he got the job. Three months later he was sent to Guantanamo Bay to translate the interrogations: to perhaps help foil a new terror attack, or to help determine the guilt or otherwise of the prisoners held there.

Now on to more serious matters: Melek Can Dickerson.

In a fantastic interview with Sibel last week titled "What if the FBI Hired Someone Honest to Look into 9-11?" David Swanson said:

There's a saying in Italian "Traduttore traditore" which means "The translator is a traitor"...


Not all translators are traitors, of course, but translators do have tremendous power, as Sibel described in the same interview:


You know, a lot of people consider the language specialists as like a clerical job, but you need to realize, when the information comes... the first people exposed to it are the language specialists. Before that information gets transferred to agents or analysts, the first person who sees it is the language specialist... and that language specialist is in a position to decide whether or not this particular piece of information... is important enough to be translated, whether or not it should be translated verbatim - in detail, or just a summary translation. So by the time that information goes to an analyst or an agent, it has already gone through this filter of the language specialist.


In other words, America's enemies are motivated to A) try to recruit existing translators B) place their own translator 'moles' in the translation unit and C) if they're really lucky/skilled/successful, take over an entire 'desk' in the FBIs translation unit. Unfortunately, and scarily, in Sibel's case, we see all three.

Melek Can Dickerson had worked for at least three organizations that were under investigation by the FBI's counter-intelligence and counter-terrorism divisions. She lied on her application form, saying that she'd never worked before in her life, and was given Top Secret clearance and immediately began working in the translation unit. We don't know whether Dickerson was given her job, and Top Secret clearance, as a result of FBI incompetence or corruption - I suspect corruption - but it doesn't really matter, because within weeks of her arrival, the Turkish desk of the FBI translation unit was completely corrupted.

On Sunday December 2nd, 2001, Dickerson and her husband, Doug, arrived at Sibel's house and tried to persuade Sibel and her husband, Matthew, to join the American Turkish Council (ATC) - one of the organizations that Dickerson had previously worked for and failed to mention on her FBI application form. The Dickersons promised Sibel and her husband, Matthew, an early retirement if they joined the ATC. Sibel immediately recognized that she was being recruited to be a mole in the translation unit because the ATC, and some of the Dickersons' other friends, were targets of counter-intelligence & counter-terrorism investigations that Sibel had been translating at the FBI.

According to the 10-page Vanity Fair article on Sibel and her case, the ATC "was being used as a front for criminal activity" involving "laundering the profits of large-scale drug deals and of selling classified military technologies to the highest bidder." In other words, serious business. We also have evidence from a bunch of other places that suggest that the ATC was involved with all sorts of illegal activity - not least, we know that Valerie Plame's CIA front company, Brewster Jennings, had been investigating the ATC for years.

Brewster Jennings' main focus was Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), and we know that companies involved with the ATC were actually supplying rogue nations with nuclear technology - hardware, and nuclear secrets, stolen (via bribes paid to vaious State Dept officials) from US nuclear labs (Sandia, Los Alamos etc)

Story so far: FBI employed Melek Can Dickerson, an agent/mole for a foreign/criminal network involved in WMD (among other things). Dickerson tried to recruit Sibel into the network.

Sibel immediately reported the Dickerson's 'recruitment' attempt to her boss at the FBI, Mike Feghali, but he had already (if not before) been co-opted by Dickerson and the ATC. Within a month of Dickerson joining the FBI, she had changed the FBI translation unit's internal procedures, with the help of her boss, Feghali, so that she alone was in charge of translating any intercepts from her friends at the ATC (and elsewhere). Of course, now that Dickerson, the mole, was in charge of 'translating' her criminal friends' wiretaps, whenever she came across anything incriminating (and there were many such situations), she simply didn't translate it, or marked it 'Not Pertinent.'

Sibel thinks that Feghali and Dickerson were having an affair - often conducted in his office, during business hours. Not only that, he also
"covered-up information and leads pre and post 9/11" (for more, see Sibel's open letter to the 911 Commission)

Sibel reached out to Dennis Saccher, the F.B.I.’s special agent in charge of Turkish counter-intelligence, and told him what had happened. He said "It sounds like espionage to me." We aren't sure of what other payoffs Feghali may have received, from Dickerson or the ATC, but he clearly shouldn't be in charge of such a sensitive translation facility at the FBI. "The translator is a traitor."

Sibel took her case up the FBI hierarchy - eventually pleading her case that the translation unit, the frontline against America's enemies, had been infiltrated by a criminal network to FBI Director Robert Mueller, to no avail - and was eventually fired 'at the government's pleasure.'

Despite being fired, Sibel continued to try to bring attention to the fact that America was in danger because foreign criminal elements had taken over the FBI translation unit. She went to the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility (internal affairs), the Department of Justice's Inspector General, the Senate Intelligence Committee, the Senate Judiciary Committee, the 911 Commission, and Henry Waxman's office. Every one of them confirmed Sibel's allegations - Republican Senator Charles Grassley explains why:


"Absolutely, she's credible. And the reason I feel she's very credible is because people within the FBI have corroborated a lot of her story."


Veteran FBI counterintelligence agent John Cole said the same thing:


"I knew (Sibel) was doing the right thing. I knew because she was right."

Cole tells how he had "talked to people who had read her file, who had read the investigative report, and they were telling me a totally different story" than FBI officials...

"They were telling me that Sibel Edmonds was a 100 percent accurate, that management knew that she was correct."


In fact, in a CBS 60 Minutes report (download, 300 megs) by Ed Bradley about Sibel's case in 2002, Charles Grassley said angrily, about these facts, "We need to turn the FBI upside down." Five years later, and the FBI has indeed been turned upside down. Five years ago, Mike Feghali was in charge of three Turkish translators, a patriot, an incompetent, and a foreign agent - he fired the patriot, sent the incompetent to Guantanamo, and had an affair, and probably received payment, from the foreign agent. Five years later, he is no longer at the bottom of the pyramid, but at the top. The FBI has been turned upside down! Feghali has been promoted, and promoted again, and is now in charge of all Arabic speakers at the FBI. "The translator is a traitor."

And if Feghali's promotion isn't bad enough, in and of itself, let me repeat that Sibel's claims about him have been reported up the chain all the way to Direct Mueller, and her allegations have been verified by the FBI OPR, the Dept of Justice's Inspector General, the Senate Intelligence Committee and the 911 Commission. All of them know of Sibel's claims, all of them know that her claims have been validated, and all of them know that Feghali has been promoted again and again and that he is now in charge of all 300 Arabic translators.

Surely that makes us all much less safe.

For more detail on just this one element of Sibel's case, see my "Sibel Edmonds' Corrupt Boss is STILL the key to National Security" post.

Please call the offices of Congressmen Waxman and Conyers demanding open hearings into Sibel Edmonds' case and the State Secrets Privilege. We need you to call on Monday and Tuesday of this week - and we'll demand an answer from Waxman mid-week.

**********


Luke recently did an interview with Expert Witness Radio, which you can download and listen to here. It runs about 60 minutes. Tomorrow, the final 30 minutes of the interview should be available at the same site and, according to Luke, that portion will focus on Sibel's former supervisor, Mike Feghali, as everyone tries to determine whether he's simply an incompetent or if he's corrupt. Or both.

One of the interesting things about this interview is that it's repeatedly remarked that, over the years with various corruption/incompetence/criminal scandals, nothing has ever been done to correct the problems that inspire outrage. The answer to this is to use alternative media, such as the Internet, to outrage the grassroots enough that they hold the feet of all corrupted/incompetent/criminal officials to the fire in order to clean House . . . and Senate . . . and judicial branch . . . and executive branch . . . and anyone else who needs cleaning out.

As Michael Levine mentioned in the interview, "Luke has done is a first-class job of putting together an indictment."

I definitely second that comment.


In a Kurdish-related matter, there's someone in North Dakota paying attention to the situation of Kurds under Turkish occupation, at Left in East Dakota:


A lot was made of Saddam's brutal treatment of the Kurds (and rightfully so.) But we don't hear much about Turkey's very overt attempts to wipe out anything that is Kurdish or related to the Kurdish people. The Kurds make up 20% of the population of Turkey and have virtually no voice in government.

Turkey's terrorist war against the Kurds has been largely supported by the United States. Just as Saddam was backed by the US when he was gassing the Kurds, Turkey has been receiving military aid during their campaign to suppress millions of Kurds. Turkey has received millions in military aid, along with other notorious human rights abusers like Israel, Egypt and Colombia.

[ . . . ]

The Kurds I have spoken to are skeptical of the US. I can't blame them. If the US really wants to be spread freedom, it should stop supportings oppression.


See? It's really very simple.

Saturday, March 17, 2007

NEXUS OF EVIL, PART 1

". . . but when the Rabbit actually took a watch out of its waistcoat-pocket, and looked at it, and then hurried on, Alice started to her feet, for it flashed across her mind that she had never before see a rabbit with either a waistcoat-pocket, or a watch to take out of it, and burning with curiosity, she ran across the field after it, and fortunately was just in time to see it pop down a large rabbit-hole under the hedge.

In another moment down went Alice after it, never once considering how in the world she was to get out again."

~ Lewis Carroll, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland.



In the last week, Luke Ryland from the Land Down Under, has been working like a horse to get the word out on Sibel Edmonds' story, in light of a newly released official complaint against the US government's use of the State Secrets Privilege to silence FBI whistle-blowers.

This new complaint is another piece of documentation that corroborates Sibel's credibility on the whole Deep State mess in the US, and can be added to the credibility given to Sibel's claims by a Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General report from January, 2005. Shortly after the OIG's report, the Project on Government Oversight (POGO) filed a motion calling for an open and public hearing of Sibel's case, noting that the DOJ had been so afraid of Sibel that it had attempted to retroactively classify information pertaining to Sibel that had been widely disseminated on the Internet for two years.

I guess retroactive classification is the current administration's attempt to avoid a scandal similar to that which surrounded the leak of what became known as the Pentagon Papers back in the 1970s. From the introduction to the Supreme Court's decision on the NYTimes' publication of the Pentagon Papers:


In 1967 Secretary of Defense Robert S. McNamara ordered a full-scale evaluation of how the United States became involved in the Vietnam War. A study team of thirty-six persons took more than a year to compile the report, which ran to forty-seven volumes, with some 4,000 pages of documentary evidence and 3,000 pages of analysis. Daniel Ellsberg, a former Defense Department economist who had grown disillusioned with the war, copied major portions of the study and then turned them over to the press. On June 13, 1971, the New York Times began publishing the papers, and the Nixon administration immediately sought to stop further publication.


Why is Sibel's case important or, more specifically, why is Sibel's case important for Kurds? It's important because if we want to end the repression of Kurds by Turkey, we must sink the Deep State and all the business interests that keep it afloat. Remember, one of the major contributing factors to the continued repression and genocide of Kurds by Turkey is the military-industrial complex, best exemplified by the recent State Department appointment of Lockheed Martin board of directors' member, Joseph Ralston, as "special envoy" to "coordinate the PKK' for Turkey. In reality, this appointment has served only to enrich the Deep Staters through recent Lockheed Martin/Turkey deals totaling some $13 billion.

As if to continue the farce of Ralston's appointment as "special envoy," we get an idea of the hypocrisy of the appointment from Ralston himself, from the AP:


On Thursday, Retired U.S. Air Force Gen. Joseph Ralston, a special envoy tasked with countering the PKK, said in Washington that the U.S. is addressing Turkish complaints about PKK activity and that reducing the PKK threat to Turkey would go a long way toward improving U.S.-Turkish relations.

"As the snows melt in the mountain passes along the Turkish-Iraqi border in several weeks, we will see if the PKK renews its attacks and how the Turkish government chooses to respond," Ralston said.



That's Ralston bullshit, because it was the US and Turkey that refused the ceasefire and continued with military operations. Let's review Ralston's statements last year. From TDN:


Days before the declaration of the truce, the United States publicly said that a PKK cease-fire would have little value and that the terrorist group instead should lay down its arms and renounce violence. "Cease-fire sort of implies an act that is taken between two states, two actors, to do that. And I don't want to confer that kind of status on the PKK by saying a cease-fire," Joseph Ralston, the newly appointed U.S. special envoy for countering the PKK, said here last Wednesday.


In that case, Ralston was Buyukanit's parrot--read the whole thing. Later, from TNA:


"The PKK is a terrorist organization, not a tool of U.S. foreign policy. We are not using and will not use the PKK in any way in Iraq," said former Gen. Joseph Ralston, the recently appointed U.S. special envoy.

[ . . . ]

"I want to be clear on this point: The U.S. will not negotiate with the PKK. We will not ask Turkey to negotiate with the PKK. And I pledge to you that I will never meet with the PKK."

[ . . . ]

"We have not taken any option off the table for dealing with the PKK. At the same time, as a former military commander, I know that the use of military force must always be the last option for addressing a problem," Ralston said. "To defeat the PKK, we will need to employ all the assets in our counterterrorism arsenal -- diplomatic, intelligence, law enforcement, and financial, in addition to military. We are working on all of these fronts."


[ . . . ]

Asked whether the U.S. intends to use the IRA model in dealing with the PKK, Ralston underlined that these two were totally different problems.

"You are comparing two very different situations, and mixing apples with oranges," the U.S. envoy said. "In the case of the PKK, our objective is to enhance cooperation with the Turkish and Iraqi governments to fight the PKK. We are also working with European governments to cut the PKK's financial and logistics lifeline. We will use all of the tools at our disposal: law enforcement, intelligence, diplomacy, financial pressure. And we have not taken any other option off the table."


More Ralston bullshit. He has "not taken any option off the table for dealing with the PKK" except that of ceasefire and political negotiation. Why, then, has the US been traipsing up and down Qendîl since 2003? And let's note that Ralston did not "underline" that the IRA and PKK are two "totally different problems," so I'll go ahead and underline that for everyone who's too thick to figure it out for themselves: The IRA and PKK are two totally different problems because the US never backed the use of Lockheed Martin aircraft to bomb millions of people out of their villages in Northern Ireland as it did in Turkish-occupied Kurdistan. Hence, Joe Ralston as a director of Lockheed Martin, along with all the other rats at Lockheed Martin, were not earning billions of dollars off Northern Ireland.

It's obvious from this that Ralston is a liar and a tool of both the Turkish general staff and the military-industrial complex--and everyone else who cooperates with them. Ralston is only one part of the Deep State in the US. His co-worker at The Cohen Group, former ambassador to Turkey, Mark Grossman, is another Deep State vermin and Sibel's information indicates that he may be an even bigger pimp than Ralston.

Luke was one of the very few people who actively helped to spread the word about the Ralston conflict of interest last October and November. Being so familiar with Sibel's case, he saw how Ralston and the Kurdish situation fit into the bigger picture. It is that bigger picture that maintains the status quo which, in turn, maintains the severe repression of the Kurdish people under Turkish tyranny.

Explaining the bigger picture (and why it matters) is the point where Luke's work over the last week or so becomes brilliant. In distilling Sibel's--and related--information, it becomes clear that the nexus of Deep State evil in the US lies in the American Turkish Council (ATC). Because Luke's work is brilliant, and because he has stolen entire posts from me in the past without permission (!!), I'll do him one better here by stealing two of his posts, one for today and one for tomorrow. Today's theft is made possible by Wot Is It Good 4:



What the heck is Sibel Edmonds' Case about? And why should I care?


As part of our campaign this week to call for hearings into Sibel Edmonds case, below the fold is a short-as-possible piece which hopes to answer the burning question in Sibel's case: What the heck is her case about?

For a longer version, see my recent interview with Scott Horton.

Please call the offices of Congressmen Waxman - (202) 225-3976 - and Conyers - (202) 225-5126 - demanding open hearings into Sibel Edmonds' case and the State Secrets Privilege.

-----------

Sibel Edmonds' case is about the intersection of illegal arms trafficking, heroin trafficking, money laundering, terrorist activities and the corruption of many "highly-recognizable, highly-known names" in and around the US government. Sibel says that the people involved will go straight to prison if we can get hearings into her case. Richard Perle, in prison. Douglas Feith, in prison. Dennis Hastert, in prison. Marc Grossman, in prison.

According to Sibel, the best place to begin trying to understand the case is a recent article by Phil Giraldi in the American Conservative. Sibel says “Giraldi has it 100% right; this I consider the most accurate summary of my case.”

Giraldi writes:

"Sibel Edmonds... could provide a major insight into how neoconservatives distort US foreign policy and enrich themselves at the same time. On one level, her story appears straightforward: several Turkish lobbying groups allegedly bribed congressmen to support policies favourable to Ankara. But beyond that, the Edmonds revelations become more serpentine and appear to involve AIPAC, Israel and a number of leading neoconservatives who have profited from the Turkish connection.

[]

Turkey benefits from the relationship by securing general benevolence and increased aid from the US Congress - as well as access to otherwise unattainable military technology. The Turkish General Staff has a particular interest because much of the military spending is channeled through companies in which the generals have a financial stake, making for a very cozy and comfortable business arrangement. The commercial interest has also fostered close political ties, with the American Turkish Council, American Turkish Cultural Alliance and the Assembly of Turkish American Associations all developing warm relationships with AIPAC and other Jewish and Israel advocacy groups throughout the US.

Someone has to be in the middle to keep the happy affair going, so enter the neocons, intent on securing Israel against all comers and also keen to turn a dollar."


Giraldi goes on to list some neocons who are "linked to Turkey" - Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Marc Grossman, Eric Edelman, and Stephen Solarz - and he suggests that they "enrich themselves" via drug trafficking and arms dealing.

The American Turkish Council (ATC)

The main Turkish lobbying group in the US is an organization called the American Turkish Council (ATC) - one of the most powerful lobby groups in the country. The ATC is heavily stacked with former government officials - statesmen, lobbyists and 'dime a dozen generals' - lobbyists and representatives of the military-industrial-complex (MIC). Brent Scowcroft is the chairman, and heavy hitters from Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Boeing, Northrup Grumman and other 'defense' contractors populate the board.

It's perhaps not surprising, then, that Turkey is a major recipient of US military aid - running to the billions of dollars - with much of it financed by the US taxpayer. Giraldi suggests in his article that this largesse appears to be the result of bribes paid to congressmen - a suggestion that shouldn't surprise anyone - but there's much more to the story than the usual Iron Triangle / Revolving Door story that we're all familiar with.

In a 10-page article in Vanity Fair on Sibel's case, the ATC is described as "a front for criminal activity" involving "large-scale drug deals and of selling classified military technologies to the highest bidder." We'll discuss the drug side of the story shortly, but let's first take a quick look at the military technology element - not only are the MIC contractors bribing congress to ensure that military aid flows to Turkey (and Israel), the Turks and the Israelis are also illegally selling that technology to the highest bidder - which inevitably includes America's enemies, States, and terrorist groups.

Sibel's case also involves the nuclear black market - some Turkish members of the ATC have supplied Pakistan's A.Q. Khan network with hardware, as have American companies that Sibel overheard on the wiretaps. Perhaps even more disturbing, as reported in Vanity Fair, other wiretaps indicate that "Turkish groups had been installing doctoral students at U.S. research institutions in order to acquire information about black market nuclear weapons." Daniel Ellsberg says that, according to Sibel, bribes were paid to people at the State Department to facilitate this activity.

These are extraordinary claims, of course, and we have a lot of evidence to support the claims - including, but not limited to, the fact that Valerie Plame's front company, Brewster Jennings, had been conducting a counter-intelligence operation against the ATC for years.

One very interesting aspect of Sibel's case that has not really gained traction is that while the ATC is understood to be the key focus of her case, it appears that AIPAC is equally involved. In a terrific 2005 interview with Chris Deliso, Sibel said:

Essentially, there is only one investigation – a very big one, an all-inclusive one... But I can tell you there are a lot of people involved, a lot of ranking officials, and a lot of illegal activities that include multi-billion-dollar drug-smuggling operations, black-market nuclear sales to terrorists and unsavory regimes, you name it... You can start from the AIPAC angle. You can start from the Plame case. You can start from my case. They all end up going to the same place, and they revolve around the same nucleus of people.


And she went a little bit further in a great interview with David Swanson this week:

"AIPAC helped form the American Turkish Council - look at the board members, look at the people. You will see the same people involved in both fronts, because it is the same operation."


Reading between the lines (in a number of different places), it appears that Sibel was actively involved in 'the AIPAC investigation' as well as the investigation into the ATC. As she says, both the ATC and AIPAC are both 'fronts' for the 'same (criminal) operation.'

Drug Trafficking.

As I document in "Sibel Edmonds & the Neocons' Turkish Gravy-Train," Afghanistan supplies almost 90% of the world's heroin, and most of that goes straight to Turkey where it is processed, packaged, warehoused, and then re-exported to other countries for final consumption. Turkey supplies approximately 80% of Europe's heroin, and 15% of heroin in the US - worth approximately $40 billion at street prices.

Turkey is widely acknowledged to be controlled by a "Deep State." In 1996, a deadly car crash at a place called Susurluk blew this out into the open. In the car were four people who probably shouldn't have been in the car together:


"an MP, a police chief, a beauty queen and her lover, a top Turkish gangster and hitman called Abdullah Catli... Catli, a heroin trafficker on Interpol’s wanted list, was carrying a diplomatic passport signed by none other than the Turkish Interior Minister himself.

[]

The Susurluk Incident became Turkey’s Watergate, exposing the deep links between the Turkish state, terrorists and drug traffickers. It revealed what Turks call the Gizli Devlet, or Deep State – the politicians, military officers and intelligence officials who worked with drug bosses to move drugs from Afghanistan into Europe."


Sibel spells it out:


"The Turkish government, MIT and the Turkish military, not only sanctions, but also actively participates in and oversees the narcotics activities and networks."


As I outlined in the curiously-titled "Sibel Edmonds: America's Watergate," Sibel's case demonstrates that Turkey's Deep State 'owns' large parts of the American establishment, to the point where it appears that there also is a 'Deep State' in the US as well. ATC/AIPAC appear to be headquarters for this Deep State in the US, a cozy club where drug dealers, weapons traffickers and past-and-present government officials coexist. Happily!

And if that's not bad enough, we also know that:


"Heroin trafficking is also the main source of funding for the al-Qaeda terrorists. A Time Magazine articlereported that al-Qaeda has established a smuggling network that is peddling Afghan heroin to buyers across the Middle East, Asia, and Europe, and in turn is using the drug revenues to purchase weapons and explosives. The article states: “...al-Qaeda and its Taliban allies are increasingly financing operations with opium sales. Anti-drug officials in Afghanistan have no hard figures on how much al-Qaeda and the Taliban are earning from drugs, but conservative estimates run into tens of millions of dollars.”


That is, our Turkish Deep State friends, the people we are directly providing with weapons, are outsourcing some of their distribution activities to al-Qaeda and the Taliban (and, while we're at it, to the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA.))

When we are discussing issues such as al-Qaeda smuggling heroin through Afghanistan and the other 'Stans, sometimes it can seem remote and distant, so let's come back to something more concrete. In Adrian Gatton's terrific recent article, The Susurluk Legacy, he quotes Huseyin Baybasin, a Turkish heroin kingpin who is now in jail in Holland:


“I handled the drugs which came through the channel of the Turkish Consulate in England... I was with the Mafia but I was carrying this out with the same Mafia group in which the rulers of Turkey were part.”


Gatton also describes how anyone in the UK government who dared speak about the issue were immediately rebuked by the Foreign Office (the UK equivalent of the State Department.)

The parallels with Sibel's case couldn't be clearer. As 60 Minutes first reported (youtube) in 2002, and Vanity Fair later reported, the Turkish Embassy was directing a lot of the heroin trafficking activity - in conjunction with people at the ATC.


"Sibel also recalled hearing wiretaps indicating that Turkish Embassy targets frequently spoke to staff members at the A.T.C.

[]

In her secure testimony, Edmonds disclosed some of what she recalled hearing... Many (calls) involved an F.B.I. target at (Chicago's) large Turkish Consulate... Some of the calls reportedly contained what sounded like references to large scale drug shipments and other crimes."


And just as the UK Foreign Office silenced anyone in the UK who tried to speak out, Sibel says:


The Department of State is easily the most corrupted of the major government agencies.

[]

In some cases where the FBI stumbles upon evidence of high-level officials being involved in drug-smuggling, they're even prevented from sharing it with the DEA [Drug Enforcement Agency]. The Department of State just comes in and says, "Leave it."


Elsewhere, Sibel says:


"For years and years, information and evidence being collected by the counterintelligence operations of certain U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies has been prevented from being transferred to criminal and narcotics divisions, and from being shared with the Drug Enforcement Agency and others with prosecutorial power. Those with direct knowledge have been prevented from making this information available and public by various gag orders and invocation of the State Secrets Privilege. Why?"


Pay attention here, because the ATC is where the worlds of the MIC and the heroin trafficking collide. One of the key Turkish interfaces at the ATC is the Turkish Generals - people that Giraldi says own a stake in the companies through which the military spending is channeled. As described earlier, these exact same people, the Turkish Deep State, also control much of the global heroin market. In between the MIC and the heroin traffickers - are the "neoconservatives (who) distort US foreign policy and enrich themselves at the same time."

One of the difficulties in trying to unravel the Sibel Edmonds case is that we aren't sure where one case ends and another begins. We know that some of the wiretaps were from the ATC, and some from the Turkish embassy in DC, and some from the embassy in Chicago. We also know that many of the wiretaps involve conversations between the embassies and the ATC.
Some of the wiretaps relate to drug trafficking, some relate to the nuclear black market and other weapons trafficking, and some refer to terrorist activity - including 9/11.

Perhaps it's not surprising, then, when she says:


You have the same players when you look into these activities at high-levels you come across the same players, they are the same people.


Those 'same people' - at least on the American side - according to Giraldi, appear to be Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, Paul Wolfowitz, Marc Grossman, Eric Edelman, and Stephen Solarz. It appears that we can also add William Cohen and Joseph Ralston - and Dennis Hastert - to that roster, and I'm sure there are a few more that haven't yet been publicly identified.

If what Sibel says is true, and her claims are all backed by documents and wiretaps, and also backed up by other agents who have filed similar complaints, and are ready and willing to testify. All of these people should be in jail. For a long, long time.

Congress must hold hearings to get to the bottom of these crimes. If you agree, please call Congress, today, and demand public, open hearings.

Contact Information

Congressman Henry Waxman (contact page)

(Those calling Waxman's office should ask for Michelle Ash & David Rapallo.)

In Washington, D.C.
2204 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
(202) 225-3976 (phone)
(202) 225-4099 (fax)

In Los Angeles
8436 West Third Street, Suite 600
Los Angeles, CA 90048
(323) 651-1040 (phone)
(818) 878-7400 (phone)
(310) 652-3095 (phone)
(323) 655-0502 (fax)

House Government Reform Committee (contact page)
By Mail or Phone:
Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
U.S. House of Representatives
2157 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515
(202) 225-5051

Please also contact Congressman John Conyers, asking him to support hearings by Chairman Waxman.
(Those calling Conyers' office should ask for Elliot Mintzberg.)
Email: John.Conyers@mail.house.gov

Washington, DC
2426 Rayburn Building
Washington, DC 20515
(202) 225-5126
(202) 225-0072 Fax

crossposted at Wot Is It Good 4 & Let Sibel Edmonds Speak and dkos and DU




Brilliant, Lukery. Absolutely brilliant. Bijît!

Friday, March 16, 2007

MARCH 16, 1988

Thursday, March 15, 2007

UNDERESTIMATING KURDISH RESOLVE

"Whenever I go to Iraqi Kurdistan, the Kurds tell me that they are our best allies, and that this friendship needs to be reciprocal. I am sorry, but this is wrong on many levels."
~ Michael Rubin.


A number of people are in a fit of pique over Michael Rubin's latest article, aptly titled, "Enabling Kurdish Illusions." There have been one, two, three, four, five, six, seven articles and a place for comments in the last few days on KurdishMedia alone about Rubin's article.

Anyone with the slightest knowledge of Michael Rubin or the American Enterprise Institute or The Weekly Standard (in which the article was published) would never get so excited over Rubin's latest pro-Turkish screed.

The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) is the oldest and perhaps the most influential right-wing fascist think-tanks in the world today. It's neoconservative "thinkers" have shaped the current administration's outlook and policies, especially since the end of the Ford presidency when Ford himself brought a number of conservative "thinkers" with him to AEI. Gerald Ford is also remembered as the president who bequeathed Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, the Darth Vader of American politics, to today's American political scene.

After a bit of a financial slump in the middle of the Reagan years, AEI began a recovery:


With the 1986 appointment of Christopher DeMuth as president, AEI's fortunes and reputation began to recuperate. Twenty years later, DeMuth remains AEI's president and has taken the think tank to new heights of power and influence—and to an annual budget of more than $25 million, up from $8 million in the late 1980s.


Among the financial backers of the AEI are ExxonMobil, whose recent contributions have been offered by AEI to scientists in order to bribe them to publish propaganda discounting global warming. Other corporate backers include:


General Electric Foundation, Amoco, Kraft, Ford Motor Company Fund, General Motors Foundation, Eastman Kodak Foundation, Metropolitan Life Foundation, Procter & Gamble Fund, Shell Companies Foundation, Chrysler Corporation, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, General Mills Foundation, Pillsbury Company Foundation, Prudential Foundation, American Express Foundation, AT&T Foundation, Corning Glass Works Foundation, Morgan Guarantee Trust, Alcoa Foundation, and PPG Industries. Wal-Mart is also a major contributor to AEI.


Foundation backers include the ultra-conservative "Smith Richardson Foundation, the Olin Foundation, the Scaife Foundation, and Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation. . ."

The AEI used to share a building with the now defunct Project for the New American Century (PNAC), among whose board of director members was one Bruce Jackson. Rastî readers should remember that Bruce Jackson was a one-time Lockheed Martin Vice-President for Strategy and Planning. While he held his position at Lockheed Martin, he was also the founder of the US Committee on NATO--but only in order to get all those former Soviet bloc countries into NATO so that they could become good Lockheed Martin consumers. Ditto for his position as president of the Project for Transitional Democracies. In 2002, he came up with a new scheme to increase Lockheed Martin's stock value--the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq.

Moreover, as Lockheed Martin Vice-President for Strategy and Planning, it's fitting that Jackson dabbled in the production of propaganda as well. To that end, he gave seed money to William Kristol so that he could found The Weekly Standard. Lockheed Martin, also supported Kristol's publishing endeavor "as a paying advertiser." For more on Jackson and The Weekly Standard, see Richard Cummings' article on Lockheed Martin.

Would it come as too much of a shock to know that AEI is a non-corporate sponsor of the American Turkish Council? Would it come as too much of a shock to know that Michael Rubin has served as a "consultant" for the Lincoln Group in Iraq? Yes, that's the same Lincoln Group that was planting propaganda in Iraqi media.

When you come right down to it, Michael Rubin is nothing more than a whore because in his business, the ideology follows the money. In this case the money is well represented by the financial backers of the AEI and it's organizational relative, the ATC. The ideology comes from Strauss, Leo Strauss, as Professor Shadia Drury explains:


All the similarities between Strauss and [Dostoevsky's] Grand Inquisitor notwithstanding, the Straussian position surpasses the Grand Inquisitor in its delusional elitism as well as in its misanthropy. This shows that while one need not be a religious thinker to be misanthropic, religion is an excellent vehicle for implementing misanthropic policies in public life.

The Grand Inquisitor presents his ruling elite as suffering under the burden of truth for the sake of humanity. So, despite his rejection of Christ, the Grand Inquisitor is modeled on the Christian conception of a suffering God who bears the burden for humanity. In contrast, Strauss represents his ruling elite as pagan gods who are full of laughter. Instead of being grim and mournful like the Grand Inquisitor, they are intoxicated, erotic, and gay. And they are certainly not too concerned about the happiness of mere mortals. They have little pity or compassion for them. On the contrary, the pain, suffering, and tragedies of the mortals provide them with entertainment.


Straussian ideology is the ideology of the elite, with its accompanying scorn for the masses of humanity, from Professor Drury at Open Democracy:


A second fundamental belief of Strauss’s ancients has to do with their insistence on the need for secrecy and the necessity of lies. In his book Persecution and the Art of Writing, Strauss outlines why secrecy is necessary. He argues that the wise must conceal their views for two reasons – to spare the people’s feelings and to protect the elite from possible reprisals.

The people will not be happy to learn that there is only one natural right – the right of the superior to rule over the inferior, the master over the slave, the husband over the wife, and the wise few over the vulgar many. In On Tyranny, Strauss refers to this natural right as the “tyrannical teaching” of his beloved ancients. It is tyrannical in the classic sense of rule above rule or in the absence of law (p. 70).

Now, the ancients were determined to keep this tyrannical teaching secret because the people are not likely to tolerate the fact that they are intended for subordination; indeed, they may very well turn their resentment against the superior few. Lies are thus necessary to protect the superior few from the persecution of the vulgar many.

The effect of Strauss’s teaching is to convince his acolytes that they are the natural ruling elite and the persecuted few. And it does not take much intelligence for them to surmise that they are in a situation of great danger, especially in a world devoted to the modern ideas of equal rights and freedoms.


With that in mind, is it really so surprising to see an ideological whore like Rubin embrace the Southern Kurds when his "elite" suddenly determine that Saddam must go, after sending their messenger boy and fellow ideological traveler, Donald Rumsfeld, to Baghdad in 1983 to pledge support for their Iraqi puppet? Saddam served their interests then, and that's why it was convenient for them to look the other way in 1988 during the Anfal campaign against the Southern Kurds. But twenty years later in 2003, Saddam no longer served their interests. In the elites' ensuing u-turn on the matter of genocide and human rights, the Southern Kurds served their interests. Now the Southern Kurds turn "bad" because they are beginning to express interests of their own, interests that don't coincide with the interests of the ruling elites.

Rubin is a well-paid propagandist because he propagandizes well. Take, for example, this little gem from November, 2005:


Take the case of the Iraqi Kurds. Long championed as a model of liberalization, they are becoming a regional embarrassment. Rather than pursue democracy, the Iraqi Kurdish leadership is more consumed with self-enrichment. Following Iraq's defeat in 1991, the Kurds rose in rebellion against Saddam Hussein. The leader of the Kurdish Democratic Party, Massoud Barzani, returned to Iraqi Kurdistan with little but respect for his family name. Fourteen years later, his personal worth is estimated at close to $2 billion. Corruption and nepotism are rife. No foreign businessman can strike a deal in his region without entering into partnership with Barzani or a favored relative. Human rights workers in Irbil say they have met Kurds imprisoned for failing to pay kickbacks. Across the region, the Barzani family conflates government, party, and personal property. Local militias uphold not the rule of law, but rather serve as Barzani's enforcers. The Kurdish Parliament, meanwhile, is flaccid; its power no greater than that of its Syrian or Libyan counterparts.


Those are not lies, but what purpose does it serve for Rubin to discuss them? If South Kurdistan were a real democracy, the very serious problem of corruption would be tackled head-on. But Rubin's idea of democracy will not allow for the growth of a real democracy in South Kurdistan; reference Professor Drury's comments on Straussian ideology. Instead, like a good neocon, Rubin's idea of democracy is that which benefits his masters, which is why the will of 98% of the Southern Kurds for independence is disregarded; for Rubin's elites, democracy is defined as globalization. Rubin is concerned about Masûd Barzanî's net worth solely because Masûd Barzanî is not as compliant as Rubin's elites would like.

It's interesting to note that Rubin has never had a thing to say about Ankara's extreme corruption, such as surfaced during the Susurluk Affair or its criminal network today, as the very credible Sibel Edmonds has been fighting.

When Rubin writes about "terrorism," it's always from an extremely selective definition. For example:


Too often Western powers try to make negotiating partners out of dictators and terrorists. Seldom does this curb terrorism.


But "making negotiating partners out of dictators and terrorists" is what Rubin's government does all the time, at least when it's not engaging in its own acts of terrorism. This was what the US did with Saddam, wasn't it? This is what the US does with the oligarchy of terrorists in Ankara, commonly known as the Turkish General Staff. Why? Because US business makes a lot of money from supporting their own terrorists, such as the recent $13 billion in Lockheed Martin fighter aircraft deals that the US secured through its "PKK coordinator," Joseph Ralston. That's what it did with Saddam during the Iran-Iraq war. In fact, that's why Peter Galbraith's economic sanctions against Saddam were nixed in the Congress--because it would have been bad business for American rice growers.

But to tell the whole story wouldn't be consistent with the propaganda campaign that Rubin's paid to push, such as this, from a book review:


She [Denise Natali] is also prone to exaggeration. If “early republican Turkey removed all opportunities for the Kurds,” then why did İsmet İnönü, an ethnic Kurd, succeed Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, Turkey’s founding father?


Sure, Mr. Rubin. Ismet Inonu was as Kurdish as Hitler was Jewish. Ignoring Ziya Gokalp's discussion of ethnicity, which formed the basis for the ridiculous "identity question" in Turkey today, serves the propaganda campaign of Ankara's oligarchic military elite. There's no question of Rubin's ignorance of the genocide of Kurds in Turkey; he's very much aware of the fact but, again, it doesn't serve elite interests to discuss it. On the other hand, labeling as "terrorists" all Kurds who resist severe oppression by America's good ally, Turkey, is in the interests of Rubin's masters.

It's very unfortunate that Southern Kurds have wasted time discussing Rubin's currrent spin on Kurdish "illusions." If they had paid attention to a little item carried in Hurriyet, last November, they would not be in shock today:


In his fax to me, Rubin explained that he had given this interview by email. He said: "I never said such things. In fact, I said the complete opposite. Here is precisely what I said concerning Turkey and Iraq's other neighboring countries: Whenever I go to Iraqi Kurdistan, the Kurds tell me that they are our best allies, and that this friendship needs to be reciprocal. I am sorry, but this is wrong on many levels. First of all, it is great that the Kurds say that they are our allies, but if we think about the fact that Kurdish politicians change their policies along with the direction the wind is blowing, there is no reason to believe American politicians are going to have any more confidence in Kurdish politicians than they have in themselves. There are many political leaders who put trade before principles in terms of importance. There are now documents which have come out which show that some top Kurdish leaders were doing serious business with Saddam's sons, Uday and Kusay. Also, Turkey is an important enough ally for Washington that it is not going to be ignored.

The Iraqi Kurds can believe what they want about Turkey, but the fact remains that for as long as Iraqi Kurdistan is a home to terrorists, Washington will always be on the side of Ankara, and not Erbil or Suleymaniye. My belief is that Turkish-American relations are very important, and despite current administrations in both Washington and Ankara, they will remain so. Most Iraqi Kurdish newspapers print exactly what they think Mesut Barzani and Jelal Talabani want to hear.

Talabani and Barzani have spent thousands of dollars getting former US ambassadors to say good things about them. I thought that since the Iraqi Kurds have not been able to learn what Washington really thinks about them, it would be a good idea to say it directly to their newspapers. Iraqi Kurds must understand that Washington will absolutely not forget about Ankara, and that for as long as the PKK exists in Northern Iraq, the region will be seen as a terror supporting one.

In the end, the Northern Iraq leadership is responsible for whatever happens in their region. And if the situation continues, Northern Iraq is not looking at a good future. Turkey has just as much a right as the US, Israel, and other countries to struggle against terror coming from across the border to it.

I hope that my explanation has cleared up the incorrect report carried in your newspaper."


Very well said. It's always good to know what and how your enemy thinks.

Michael Rubin claims that "Kurds underestimate Turkish resolve." In reality, Rubin and his masters in the American and Turkish elites underestimate the resolve of Kurds under Turkish occupation and the resolve of PKK.

Wake up, South Kurdistan, and stop groveling. Spring is in the air; it's time for that which the elites fear most--Serhildan.

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

CENSORSHIP, DAMNED CENSORSHIP, AND CONTINUED DENIAL

"Censorship is advertising paid by the government."
~ Federico Fellini.


A lot of stuff is going on, so where should I start?

First of all, Sibel Edmonds has a new interview, which you can read at Lukery's WotIsItGood4, the venerable center around which Left Blogistan revolves. That would be Lukery's newly coined phrase. I like it. It rhymes with "Kurdistan."

If you don't feel like reading, you can listen to the interview here. Sibel talks about her gag order, summarizes the main areas that she blew the whistle on, discusses the current campaign to get an open hearing for her, and touches on Deep Staters in the US.

Also the We Want Freedom Campaign (Ozgurluk istiyoruz) has a new newsletter out--not on the website yet, but I have it in email--and here are a few items of interest:


Wave of attacks on Kurdish people and their institutions from the Turkish state

It has come out that the state which can not execute Abdullah Öcalan, tries to kill him poisoning slowly. Turkish state also increased its attacks on Kurdish people and their institutions. In many cities of Kurdistan, DTP (Democratic Society Party) buildings were raided by the police and many DTP members, including DTP representatives of Diyarbakir, Van and Siirt were arrested and jailed.
Following a stone-attack, glasses of the building of DTP Izmir city organisation were broken.

ESP: Kurdish people are not alone

On 9 March, Socialist Platform of the Oppressed (ESP) made a demonstration in front of the Galatasaray High School in Istanbul against the oppression over the Kurdish people and the poisoning of Abdullah Öcalan. Tekstil-Sen members also supported the action. ESP members made solidarity visits to DTP in Istanbul and Ankara and gave the message: 'We're together with DTP against oppressions and attacks.'

Human-Rights Defender and Lawyer Eren Keskin taken under police custody in Van.

Human-Rights Defender and Lawyer Eren Keskin was taken under custody in her hotel room at about 04:00 am in Van where she went for a panel discussion on the occasion of 8 March International Labouring Women’s Day. It has been heard that the claim was her missing examination at a court case about Newroz celebrations in Istanbul in 2002. She was released by the Van Court.

Istanbul branch of Human Rights Society and Limter-Is union protested the arrestment of Eren Keskin.

8 students who were taken under custody in Van are arrested.

In Van, 32 students were taken under custody within the ongoing operations. After their examination by the public prosecutor, 21 students were sent to the court, of which 8 were arrested with the claim that they are 'members of an organisation'.


A heval pointed out a Hurriyet article which reports that the records of one of Ocalan's lawyers, Mahmut Sakar, has been invalidated, effectively barring him from the practice of law. This is another fallout from the news of Ocalan's poisoning and it's highly reminiscent of what happened to Ferhat Sarikaya, the Wan prosecutor who was fired for connecting Buyukanit's name with the Deep State bombing in Semdinli in November, 2005. In Turkey, if you don't like what the lawyer says, you forbid them from practicing law. Every democracy does it that way, right?

In a related item, other lawyers for Ocalan are rightly dissatisfied with the bullshit that's is passing for the so-called Justice Ministry's examination of Ocalan, from the hevals at KurdishInfo:


Regrettably, our request has been ignored. We do not know the details of the investigation conducted by the Senior State Prosecutor and we do not know whether or not the authorities for forensic medicine have the necessary technical facilities to determine the facts of an intoxication.

To conclude the discussions and to establish the truth it is necessary for an independent delegation of experts to takes samples of Mr Ocalan's hair, tissues and blood, examine the environment such as walls, paint, food and articles which he uses daily and analyze them in a laboratory equipped with the necessary technical facilities.


I was thinking . . . there are supposed to be some thousand Mehmetciks who guard Imrali and its one prisoner, and wouldn't it be interesting to have their hair samples analyzed to see what their strontium and chromium levels are? If this poisoning were something in the environment, wouldn't you think the Mehmetciks on duty would have elevated levels of strontium, too? But the Turkish government, the so-called Justice Ministry, and the Paşas don't seem to be the least bit concerned about Mehmetcik. Or if the Turkish government really wanted to prove that there was nothing wrong with Ocalan, it would fall all over itself to get an impartial medical team to make an examination. What better way to say, "I told you so?" But the government doesn't do this and Cicek comes off as the biggest liar in a government notorious for big liars.

Atta boy, Cemil!

The politics of repression makes its way to the world of film, with the UAE proving it's yet another government of losers by caving in to Turkish threats and banning Mano Khalil's film "David the Tolhildan," from KurdishMedia:


Mano Khalil, the director of the documentary "David the Tolhildan“, made a statement in which he said the suspension shows the oppressive face of the Turkish state. Khalil said that the film was to be shown on 12 of March at 10 pm however he has been told by the director of the festival in the morning at the same day that they cannot screen the film. Khalil’s said: „The festival director, Masoud Imrali Al Ali, told me that there was a pressure from the Turkish state on the United Arap Emirates (UAE) government and UAE goverment officials recommended in writing to the festival committee not to screen the documentary."


No big surprise, here. I mean, no one would ever mistake swishy Gulf Arabs for courageous lions. . . or HPG gerîlas. For more on Heval Tolhildan's story, check out a Rastî post from November, "Tolhildan of Lausanne".

In a round-about way, The Jamestown Foundation confirms that PJAK did, in fact, shoot down one of the mullah's military helicopters in February:


. . . on February 28, Brigadier-General Yahya Rahim Safavi, the head of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, speaking at the funeral of the crash victims, promised that the military assault was open-ended and that the army had surrounded several Kurdish fighters. "The bandits and counter-revolutionaries should know that Iranian troops will deal with them strongly and will not stop the operation to uproot them," he said.


If the helicopter had been brought down by bad weather, as Iranian propaganda outlets claimed, why talk about PJAK at the funeral of the dirty pasdarans? OOPS! Thanks, PJAK! Bring down about a thousand more. The same report mentions that PJAK is beginning to come out of winter hibernation:


This latest fighting—apparently the heaviest in at least a year—comes after months of sporadic reports of PJAK activity in Iran. On September 28, 2006, for example, Iran said that two members of the PKK (which Iran regularly confuses with the closely affiliated PJAK) blew up a gas pipeline to Turkey near the town of Bazargan in West Azerbaijan province (Fars News Agency, September 31, 2006). The difficulty of obtaining information from Iran's Kurdish regions makes it difficult to interpret these scattered reports—particularly as only the very largest events are reported. Despite the paucity of information, however, these reports may indicate that PJAK is experimenting with different strategies and increasing its capabilities, while simultaneously abiding by its policy of only fighting if attacked in order to protect its civil activists (Terrorism Monitor, June 15, 2006).

At the same time, however, the reports suggest that PJAK can now deploy fighters in larger groups than before and is equipping them with more potent weaponry. The group may also be aiming to copy some of the tactics of Iraq's Sunni Arab insurgents—in particular by targeting Iran's oil industry and using rockets to attack helicopters. At the same time, Iran has clearly stepped up efforts to destroy PJAK, and it has had a measure of success, albeit at some cost to itself.


PKK blew up a gas line near Agri in August last year. As an effective harassment campaign, energy pipelines should definitely become prime targets in the future for both HRK and HPG.

Eric Edelman says that PKK is trying to destabilize "The Southeast" and "create civilian victims." Create civilian victims? Hmm . . . not really. It's the US itself which is trying to destablize "The Southeast" and "create civilian victims" by its billions of dollars of arms sales to a country that is well-known world-wide for its atrocious human rights record. It was all those American arms that helped to make the murder of 40,000 Kurds possible, and its sales of more of those arms that is the reason for the US rejection of the ceasefire.

What's in your portfolio, Mr. Edelman? Quite a bit of LMT? Hey, aren't you named in some of those wiretaps that Sibel translated?

Inquiring minds wanna know.

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

DEMONSTRATIONS IN ISTANBUL

"If the allegations are true, it means that a planned murder is being consciously committed. Ocalan wields influence over the Kurdish people. If something bad happens, those who sympathise with him will react... Turkey will be faced with very serious dangers."
~ Aysel Tugluk, DTP Co-Chairman.



Demonstrations in Istanbul over the poisoning of Ocalan:



Turkish nationalists beat a Kurdish protester during a demonstration in Istanbul, Turkey, Sunday, March 11, 2007. Turkey is bracing for a new wave of trouble with Kurdish activists who, in years past, have seized on a spring festival as a rallying cry for their separatist struggle. The March 21 festival of Nowruz comes amid court verdicts against Kurdish leaders, and an uptick in fighting in rugged terrain near the Iraq border. After a relative lull, tension between Turkey and Kurds are again on the increase. A number of prominent Kurdish leaders were recently sentenced to jail for speaking respectfully of the imprisoned Kurdish rebel leader, Abdullah Ocalan. (AP Photo/Str)



Masked Kurdish protesters hold a poster of Abdullah Ocalan, a banner that reads: 'Esteemed Ocalan' and a flag of Kurdistan Workers Party during a demonstration in Istanbul, Turkey, Sunday, March 11, 2007. (AP Photo)



A protester throws a petrol bomb on the ground during a demonstration in Gazi district in Istanbul in support of jailed Kurdish rebel leader Abdullah Ocalan who is currently serving a life sentence in a prison on Imrali Island off Istanbul March 11, 2007. REUTERS/Osman Orsal (TURKEY)



Turkish riot police wearing gas masks stand next to a barricade set up by masked demonstrators in a suburb in Istanbul March 11, 2007. The demonstration was held to support Ocalan, the jailed leader of illegal Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), captured on 1999 and serving a life imprisonment. EDITORS NOTE: TURKISH LAW REQUIRES THAT FACES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS ARE MASKED IN PUBLICATIONS WITHIN TURKEY REUTERS/Osman Orsal (TURKEY)



A protester (C), beaten by a group of Turkish nationalists during a demonstration, is led away by plainclothes police in Istanbul March 11, 2007. The demonstration was held to support Ocalan, the jailed leader of the illegal Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), who was captured in 1999 and is serving life imprisonment. EDITORS NOTE: TURKISH LAW REQUIRES THAT FACES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS ARE MASKED IN PUBLICATIONS WITHIN TURKEY REUTERS/Osman Orsal (TURKEY)



Masked demonstrators march with Kurdish colours as they demonstrate in a suburb in Istanbul March 11, 2007. The demonstration was held to support Abdullah Ocalan, the jailed leader of illegal Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), who is currently serving a life sentence. The banner reads 'Ocalan is our political will and his health is our health.' REUTERS/Osman Orsal (TURKEY)



Resident puts out flames on a street after a petrol bomb was thrown by pro-Kurdish protesters during a demonstration in a suburb in Istanbul March 11, 2007. REUTERS/Osman Orsal (TURKEY)



Residents try douse a car after it was burnt by a petrol bomb thrown by pro-Kurdish protesters during a demonstration in a suburb in Istanbul March 11, 2007. REUTERS/Osman Orsal (TURKEY)



Turkish riot police, wearing gas masks, stand next to a barricade set up by masked demonstrators in a suburb in Istanbul March 11, 2007. REUTERS/Osman Orsal (TURKEY)


As the demonstrations went on in Istanbul, in Scotland, someone was putting together an excellent discussion of the situation of Kurds under Turkish repression, from Ayrshire Blog:


Nevertheless fear of Kurdish political demands remains ingrained within the states of the region. Each state, Turkey,Iran, Syria and Iraq appears fearful that allowing Kurdish political and cultural development will result in seccession and the creation of a Kurdish state.

But are these fears justified? And even if they were would that justify the brutal supression of the Kurdish people and their political aspirations?

It is worth looking at some of the pronouncements of the most prominant Kurdish parties and politicians to see what their aspirations truly are.

Abdullah Ocalan is the best known representative of the struggle for Kurdish freedoms. Currently languishing in a Turkish jail, he is the voice of the oppressed Kurds. The movement that he represents has various strands, and the PKK, the best known of these, has been labelled a terrorist organisation by the US.

The PKK may indeed have committed terrorist actions on occassions but the Kurds have also been subject to massive oppression for example in Turkey.(Ref 1) It is important however to distinguish between organisations which are by their nature wedded to terrorist methods and those for whom terrorist action is a short-term expedient on the path towards political resolution. If we fail to make such a distinction we are likely to miss significant chances for conflict resolution and constructive solutions to international and ethnic political problems.

[ . . . ]

If Ocalan's position and the position espoused by the KKK can accomodate the existing nations states then a solution is achievable. Sadly however, the Turkish state, wedded as it still is to narrow notions of nationalism and control over constitutional debate, has been unable to repond positively to the Ocalan/KKK position. In fact, on the contrary, Turkish repression of Kurdish political debate is a fascistic as ever. This is unlikely to change until Turkey ( and the Turkish people) shows itself able to confront its own historical demons ( eg armenian massacres) and develops into a more politically and culturally pluralistic and tolerant society.


Sadly, too, both the US and Turkey, through Lockheed Martin's "PKK coordinator," rejected what has become the fifth unilateral PKK ceasefire and continued operations against HPG gerîlas. Additionally, the proposal for a democratic solution to the conflict offered at the end of August, 2006, was ignored.

For US and Turkish policy makers, who are deeply embedded in the deep shit of the Deep State, peace simply does not pay.

Expect unrest to continue, especially since the poisoning of Ocalan has not been adequately addressed by the fascist Ankara regime, as reported by IHT:


In the latest dispute, Turkey said Monday that tests on Ocalan's hair, urine and skin samples showed no signs of poisoning despite allegations by his lawyers.

"From now on, nobody should go after such lies," said Justice Minister Cemil Cicek, who also serves as the government spokesman. "No one should take such games seriously. Turkey is a state of law and Turkey has nothing to hide."


If Turkey has nothing to hide, as the so-called Justice Minister says, why has there been no independent, impartial, international medical team to investigate Ocalan's health and run the same hair analysis tests that have been previously run, and which Kurdish political leaders in Turkish-occupied Kurdistan and Diaspora have unanimously called for?

The truth is that Turkey has everything to hide.

And no matter how well Ilker Paşa does his arithmetic, the other truth is that Kurds continue to stream to the mountains.

Sunday, March 11, 2007

A TRADITION OF ASSASSINATION

"In my country, the murderers are on the streets and the intellectuals are behind bars."
~ Akin Birdal.


It would appear that there have been threats of assassination directed against Amed's wildly popular mayor, Osman Baydemir, as well as against DTP co-chairman, Ahmet Turk. At the end of February, Ahmet Turk, along with Aysel Tugluk, was sentenced to a year an a half of prison time for distributing materials in Kurdish language and for "praising" Ocalan. Last week, Ahmet Turk was sentenced to another six months prison time for referring to Apo as "Mister."

Almost a year ago, during the Amed Serhildan, Osman Baydemir's convoy was attacked as it was returning from a meeting with the Diyarbakir governor. More on that from KHRP's fact-finding mission on Turkey's indiscriminate use of force during the serhildan:



En-route from meeting the Governor to discuss taking steps to calm the people, the convoy in which the Mayor of Diyarbakir, Osman Baydemir was travelling was attacked by armed police. Police held a pistol to the head of one of the Mayor’s guards, and threatened to kill Baydemir, while another of his guards was cut on the forehead. The Mayor perceived this as a ‘serious threat’. As noted by a member of İnsan Hakları Derneği (Human Rights Association of Turkey, İHD) who was travelling in the same group, ‘If they can behave this way with the Mayor, imagine how they behave with ordinary people in the street’. İHD reported that police also racked and pointed their weapons at them from a distance of just one metre, and damaged the cars in which they were travelling by throwing stones.


More on the assassination threats, from Zaman:


Turkey's Security Directorate has put the police departments of 81 provinces into a state of high alert, focusing on provocations attempting to fuel Kurdish-Turkish conflict following the receipt of intelligence reports -- which came through a former member of Turkey's anti-terror unit -- on assassination plans for Diyarbakır Mayor Osman Baydemir and leader of the pro-Kurdish Democratic Society Party (DTP) Ahmet Türk.

Consequently, both the Diyarbakır and Ankrara security administrations, through internal notification, were warned to increase their security measures.

[ . . . ]

Police sources indicated that plans for an attack on Baydemir in previous months were discovered and prevented by the police. The discovery was not made public and those planning the attack were arrested and sentenced to prison.

It was also found out that Baydemir did not want police protection and preferred to provide security for himself by his own means. A few days ago Baydemir installed a "jammer" device on his vehicle to protect him from possible bomb attacks; however, he was forced to remove this device, the use of which was said to be illegal.

Intelligence sources say there are plans for a long-lasting Turkish-Kurdish conflict and their source, a person known for his nationalist identity who left the anti-terror unit, reported that the plans to assassinate Baydemir and Türk were hatched by a desire to increase Turkish-Kurdish conflict.


Obviously there is something odd going on here. First of all, since when do those who plan assassinations against Kurdish politicians, or even against ordinary Kurds, get arrested and sentenced to prison? According to the US State Department's recent human rights report on Turkey, security forces who have tortured people are rarely convicted. Why would there be an arrest and conviction when the would-be assassin(s) hadn't done anything?

Secondly, it's difficult to believe that the polarization within the Turkish-Kurdish conflict could get much worse, now that the Turkish state must answer for its poisoning of Abdullah Ocalan, and given that DTP has warned of the serious consequences Turkey will face if it doesn't come clean about the poisoning, but assassinations of DTP politicians would be a good step toward all hell breaking loose. Recent arrests of DTP politicians and now, this current threat by an ultra-nationalist from an "anti-terror" unit, are inspired by Kurdish reaction to Ocalan's poisoning.

Thirdly, if the Turkish state is so solicitous for the welfare of Osman Baydemir, why do they forbid him to use a jamming device on his vehicle? Bomb jamming devices generally work by saturating an area with electronic signals in order to neutralize bombs--such as IED's--that are detonated through remote control. There's more on bomb jammers at Global Security. Since bomb jammers are not usually available for commercial use, but are used by state security forces to protect dignitaries, one would think the use of such a jammer by a mayor who is under threat of assassination would be appropriate.

Unless it is the state itself which is really planning the assassination--a scenario that is not outside the realm of possibility given Turkey's brutal history of state-sponsored assassinations and extrajudicial murders during it's Dirty War. The decision to use "extra-legal" means of fighting the Kurdish people was made in 1992 and implemented after the mysterious death of Turgut Ozal. From Covert Action Quarterly:


"The first organization to be set up on this guideline was the JITEM (Gendarme Intelligence and Counter Terrorism) which was first established in the southeast. ... JITEM was effectively controlled by now Lt. Gen. Veli Kucuk. Alongside JITEM, two other units were carved out of the body of the MIT [Turkish Intelligence Organization] and Special Police Teams and henchmen were co-opted from among former PKK guerrillas who had turned informer."


Veli Kucuk's name should ring a bell. Veli Kucuk was not only involved with the control of JITEM, but he was also deeply involved with the Susurluk Affair yet walked free of that scandal. Then he was associated with Alparslan Aslan, who assassinated a Turkish judge last May. Nothing came of his association with Aslan. More recently Kucuk was found to be one of those behind the Hrant Dink murder. So the question is whether the Turkish state is unable or unwilling to rid itself of Deep State vermin like Kucuk.

My bet is that it is unwilling to do so since it is not a civilian government that rules Turkey, but the Paşas. In fact, last Friday it was revealed that the Turkish general staff has divided Turkish media into two groups according to the way they view the military. From TDN:


A new saga has begun in the relationship between the Turkish military and the press after Nokta magazine reported on a document that shows the military has divided the Turkish media and journalists into two groups in accordance with the way they viewed the military.

The document, dated November 2006, was prepared by the Office of the Chief of General Staff Public and Press Relations Bureau and is called, A reassessment of accredited press and media organs. Journalists and media organs that want to follow the activities of the Office of the Chief of General Staff need to be accredited by the office.

According to reports, the document also gave (+) or (-) marks for reports that appeared in the media.


There is more on this fascist revelation at Bianet, while Aksam has named names of some of the journalists that made it onto the Paşas' black list:


From Radikal: Hasan Celal Guzel, Murat Belge, Yildirim Turker, Nuray Mert

From Haberturk'ten 2: Ufuk Guldemir, Erol Mutercimler

From Takvim: Nazli Ilicak

From SKY Turk: Nihat Genc

From Jane's Defense Weekly: Lale Sariibrahimoglu


Aksam also reminds us of the "memorandum" that became known as the Turkish general staff's Strong Action Plan, and which led to the assassination attempt on Akin Birdal:


A secret military document, popularly known as the "memorandum" (andic), was disclosed by Nazli Ilicak, a journalist and a Member of Parliament, in her column in the Yeni Safak daily on 21 October 2000. This document, entitled Strong Action Plan, had been prepared at the directive of the Office of the Chief General in 21 April 1998, and was subsequently published by approval of Cevik Bir, the then-President of the Chief Staff. Strong Action Plan contained instructions by the military to major daily newspapers and their chief columnists to initiate a smear campaign against certain journalists, politicians, and human rights activists and organisations in order to discredit them publicly by associating them with the Kurdish Workers' Party (PKK). The list of targeted people included Akin Birdal, a lawyer and ex-chairman of the Human Rights Association, journalists Mehmet Ali Brand, Cengiz Candar, Mahir Kaynak, Yalcin Kucuk and Mahir Sayin, and the political parties Virtue Party and HADEP. As an alleged consequence of the ensuing media campaign, journalists such as Cengiz Candar and Mehmet Ali Birand lost their columns in their newspapers, and an assassination attempt was carried out against Akin Birdal (see Cases). The Office of the Chief Staff affirmed the existence of that document in a press statement of 3 November 2000, claiming that the program proposed in the document had not in fact been implemented. Subsequently, Nazli Ilicak, Akin Birdal, Hasan Celal Guzel (former Education Minister and leader of the Rebirth Party), Sanar Yurdatapan (a human rights defender) and Mazlum-Der filed complaints in November 2000 against the former General Staff Cevik Bir on grounds of abuse of authority.


But the Strong Action Plan was implemented, at least in the case of Akin Birdal, based on certain "accusations" by notorious PKK traitor, Semdin Sakik. It was later found that Sakik's accusations had been "doctored" to achieve the desired propaganda frenzy that was used as a pretext for the attempted murder of Akin.

After this, let us not fool ourselves by believing that there is a free press in Turkey while a sword of Damocles is dangled by the military over the head of every journalist in the country. Neither let us fool ourselves by believing that the international supporters of military rule in Turkey have any sincere desire to spread democracy in the Middle East.

Saturday, March 10, 2007

DEEP STATE SECRETS PRIVILEGE

"On Tuesday, July 6, 2004, Judge Reggie Walton made a decision and ruled on my case. Under his ruling, I, an American citizen, am not entitled to pursue my 1st and 5th Amendment rights guaranteed under the Constitution of the United States. The vague reasoning cited, without any explanation, is to protect 'certain diplomatic relations for national security.'"
~ Sibel Edmonds.


Earlier this week, Sibel Edmonds' organization, the National Security Whistleblower's Coalition, issued a press release describing another FBI agent's corroboration of Edmonds' own claims "of illegal activities by Turkish organizations and their agents in the United States, and the involvement of certain elected and appointed U.S. officials in the Department of State, Pentagon, and the U.S. Congress in these activities."

If you are a Kurd from Turkey, you won't need more corroboration of Ms. Edmonds allegations; history alone will testify to the veracity of her story, and by "history" I mean Susurluk.


For those who don't know--or don't remember--the Susurluk incident occured on November 3, 1996, when a Mercedes-Benz crashed into a truck on a highway in Susurluk, Turkey. All but one of the passengers in the Mercedes died at the scene, but they were no ordinary passengers. Sedat Bucak, the only survivor, was a Kurdish feudal landlord in the pay of the Turkish state, with thousands of village guards under his command, as well as being a former True Path Party (DYP) Member of Parliament. Coincidentally, Tansu Ciller was not only the leader of DYP at the time, but also Turkey's Prime Minister.

But Sedat Bucak was a relative small fry. The stunning discovery in the crushed Mercedes, and the thing that turned a traffic accident into a national scandal, was the body of Abdullah Catli, in the car with his former beauty queen-turned-Turkish mafia hitwoman mistress, a former Istanbul police chief and the erstwhile DYP parliamentarian, Bucak. Abdullah Catli was on the lam from police--from Interpol, to be exact--had been a convicted international drug-trafficker, and was head of the notorious Turkish fascist organization, the Gray Wolves. The Susurluk Affair briefly pulled back the curtain to reveal Turkish government and military involvement with the international drug trade and other Turkish mafia activities, Gladio operations, the dirty war in Turkish-occupied Kurdistan, and numerous extrajudicial murders. From Covert Action Quarterly:


"It all started in early 1992," believes Ismet Berkan, senior Ankara correspondent for the national daily Radikal. "That year, the Turkish armed forces high command underwent a dramatic shift in its counterinsurgency strategy in the combat against [the] rebel Kurdish guerrilla PKK."


So began the Dirty War against the Kurdish people in Turkey's long-repressed "Southeast," which resulted in the forced removal of millions of Kurds from their traditional lands, the destruction of their homes, villages, livestock, and real property. Kurdish politicians, activists, journalists, and ordinary people were subjected to detention and arrest, always accompanied by horrific acts of torture on the part of Turkish security forces, as well as the "disappearance" or extrajudicial murder of thousands of others. It was Turkish state assassins, like Abdullah Catli, who carried out the "disappearances" and murders, and it was employees of the American military and US State Department, like Douglas Dickerson and Marc Grossman, who armed them.


Ankara enjoyed the enthusiastic support of Washington in what has become knows as the "Dirty War," by supplying the weapons and military training that facilitated the gross human rights abuses perpetrated against Kurds by Turkish security forces. Although many Americans seem to welcome a Democratic-dominated Congress after seven years of the Bush administration, it was the Clinton administration that hypocritically called for arms control even as it assisted with the slaughter of Kurds in Southeast Turkey, as reported by Frida Berrigan of the Arms Control Resource Center of the World Policy Institute, in 2000:


During the first five years of the Clinton administration the U.S. sold nearly $5 billion worth of weaponry to Turkey, with more than $1 billion in 1997 alone. Turkey has used these weapons in an aggressive and disproportionately armed civil war against the Kurdistan Worker’s Party, which is seeking recognition for Turkey’s oppressed Kurdish minority.


Berrigan goes on to quote a 1995 Human Rights Watch report, "Weapons Transfers and Violations of the Laws of War in Turkey," a damning indictment of the severe abuses of Turkish security forces with the assistance of US arms sales:


This report documents the Turkish security forces' violations of the laws of war and of human rights, and their reliance on U.S. and NATO-supplied weapons in doing so. Drawing on investigations of twenty-nine incidents that occurred between 1992 and 1995, the report links specific weapons systems to individual incidents of Turkish violations. Supplemented by interviews with former Turkish soldiers, U.S. officials and defense experts, the report concludes that U.S. weapons, as well as those supplied by other NATO members, are regularly used by Turkey to commit severe human rights abuses and violations of the laws of war in the southeast.

The most egregious examples of Turkey's reliance on U.S. weaponry in committing abuses are its use of U.S.-supplied fighter-bombers to attack civilian villages and its use of U.S.-supplied helicopters in support of a wide range of abusive practices, including the punitive destruction of villages, extrajudicial executions, torture, and indiscriminate fire.


In spite of the extensive documentation contained in the 1995 HRW report, business was still booming in 1999, as a joint report of the World Policy Insitute and the Federation of American Scientists indicated.

In addition to violations of the laws of war, US-backing of the Turkish government's Dirty War against the Kurds facilitated Turkey's role in the international drug trade, as Kendal Nezan reported in Le Monde Diplomatique in 1998:


After the Gulf War in 1991, Turkey found itself deprived of the all-important Iraqi market and, since it lacked significant oil reserves of its own, it decided to make up for the loss by turning more massively to drugs. The trafficking increased in intensity with the arrival of the "hawks" in power, after the death in suspicious circumstances of President Turgut Özal in April 1993. According to the minister of interior, the war in Kurdistan had cost the Turkish exchequer upwards of $12.5 billion (7). Whereas, according to the daily Hürriyet, Turkey’s heroin trafficking brought in $25 billion in 1995 and $37.5 billion in 1996 (8).


Here again, the principal players in the Susurluk Affair were involved; however, it's quite likely that they were not alone, but had American counterparts, as mentioned in the Vanity Fair story about Sibel Edmonds:


In fact, much of what Edmonds reportedly heard seemed to concern not state espionage but criminal activity. There was talk, she told investigators, of laundering the profits of large-scale drug deals and of selling classified military technologies to the highest bidder.


It is here that we pick up the threads of Susurluk that reach deeply into the bureaucratic and lobbyist milieu of Washington DC.

In 2004, in an interview with Christopher Deliso, former FBI translator and whistle-blower Sibel Edmonds spoke of her encounter with Douglas and Melek Can Dickerson and their attempts to recruit her into the American Turkish Council. Douglas Dickerson was an US Air Force officer who had been stationed in Turkey sometime between 1991 and 1995, where he met and married MIT agent Melek Can Dickerson. Major Dickerson was in charge of weapons procurement for, among other countries, Turkey.

In 2006 more information surfaced on Dickerson, who "worked in the embassy's military attaché office and was responsible for logistics matters with the Turkish military." Furthermore:


In 1996, the Defense Department's Inspector General's office launched an investigation of a U.S. military officer at the Ankara embassy who was caught receiving a bribe from MIT agents. Shortly after the investigation started, Dickerson was transferred to a U.S. Air Force base in Germany.


Turkish MIT was heavily involved with the people who died in the car crash in Susurluk in the same year, namely MIT's counter-"terror" chief Mehmet Eymur, and Interior Minister Mehmet Agar (DYP).

Dickerson worked under the direction of American Deep Stater, Marc Grossman, who served as Deputy Chief of Mission in Ankara from 1989 to 1992, and then as ambassador to Turkey from 1994 to 1997. According to the same 2006 report, Grossman became a person of interest "to counter-intelligence agents since his stint as U.S. ambassador in Ankara." Was he also investigated, along with Dickerson, for his involvement with MIT? Was he also taking bribes from MIT? For what reason? Why did Grossman resign from the State Department at the beginning of 2005 when he held the third-ranking position in the department after an apparently successful 29-year career? How much Kurdish blood is on Marc Grossman's hands?

Undoubtedly Grossman was involved with the very same weapons transfers that HRW condemned in 1995. The fact that Grossman is now a vice-chairman of The Cohen Group, a lobby firm for the war industry headed by former Clinton-appointed defense secretary, William Cohen, indicates that he is cashing in on old relationships built during his Ankara days.

Interestingly enough, the other vice-chairman of The Cohen Group, former NATO commander, Joseph Ralston, was a member of the American Turkish Council's Advisory Board for 2006; is a member of the Board of Directors of Lockheed Martin, for whom he also lobbies; and was appointed at the end of August, 2006, as the US "special envoy" to "coordinate the PKK" for Turkey. Choosing to reject PKK's offer of a political solution for the Kurdish situation, and choosing to reject a PKK unilateral ceasefire, it would appear that the only thing Ralston has been successful with coordinating has been some $13 billion in Lockheed Martin contracts with the Turkish general staff.

All of this history, this unfinished business of Susurluk and the spread of the Deep State to the US, fits seamlessly with the allegations made by Sibel Edmonds and discussed by her in Part 1 and Part 2 of "Highjacking of a Nation." Of course, it has not been simply one nation that has been highjacked, but three: the American nation, the Turkish nation, and the Kurdish nation. Of these three, it has been the Kurdish nation that has paid the highest price so far. For that reason, it serves the interests of the Kurdish nation to support American demands for open hearings into Sibel Edmonds' case. For more on that, including up-to-the-minute updates, check Lukery's new blog, Let Sibel Edmonds Speak.

For more information, Lukery's still running the Kill The Messenger blog and, his always fascinating political blog, WotIsItGood4--now coming at you in the new, improved, industrial-strength Blogger.

With its cast of characters and real-life international intrigue; with subsequent wars and rumors of wars, the Susurluk Affair and intervening decade would appear to be made-in-Hollywood material. For Americans in particular it's unfortunate that the story is not acted out on the big screen because, at the time, the Susurluk scandal threatened to expose the corruption of the Turkish government. Today, it should serve to expose-and put an end to--the same corruption on American shores.

If Sibel Edmonds--or ordinary Kurds--tell about the reality which is the Deep State, the threat it poses in the current global political climate, and how it came to be such a threat in the first place, Americans won't believe it.

But let Oliver Stone tell them; then they'll believe.

Thursday, March 08, 2007

HAPPY INTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S DAY, CIZÎR

"Kurds are one of the “domestic enemies” that this system, controlled by the military, needs to create in order to sustain its domination."
~ Eren Keskin.



A Kurdish woman displays a portrait of the jailed PKK Kurdish rebel leader Abdullah Ocalan during an international women's day demonstration in Istanbul March 4, 2007. Protesters, mostly Kurdish women, marched in Istanbul on Sunday to celebrate the world women's day which falls on March 8. REUTERS/Osman Orsal.


A 77-year-old Kurdish separatist grandmother was arrested in Cizîr for protesting the poisoning of Ocalan, from Reuters:


Turkish authorities brought charges on Thursday against 31 women for demonstrating in support of jailed Kurdish rebel leader Abdullah Ocalan.

The women, four of them under 18 years old and one as old as 77, had chanted pro-separatist slogans during an unauthorised demonstration on Wednesday in Sirnak province near the Syrian border in mainly Kurdish southeast Turkey, officials said.

It was not immediately clear how long they might have to spend in jail if convicted.


More from Hurriyet:


The women were arrested in the town of Cizre outside of the southeastern city of Sirnak, a largely Kurdish area. Shouting slogans in support of Ocalan, the women had gathered March 6 in Cizre to protest what they claim is the poisoning efforts against the man nicknamed "Apo." Entering the local Democratic Society Party building in Cizre, the women were then arrested by Anti-Terrorism teams of security forces, and charged with "shouting slogans and carrying posters and banners in a protest that did not have authority to take place."


For allegedly taking part in an "unauthorized" protest (Note: No protests are "authorized" in Turkish-occupied Kurdistan), no one has any idea how long the women will be imprisoned. The big, brave, "anti-terrorist" security forces historically enjoy state protection for torture and rape of women prisoners, so we have a pretty good idea of what is happening to them right now in detention.

The pro-torture Bush Administration released the State Department's current human rights report on Turkey. Let's see what it says about torture and impunity of security forces:


Courts investigated many allegations of abuse and torture by security forces during the year; however, they rarely convicted or punished offenders (see section 1.e.). When courts did convict offenders, punishment generally was minimal and sentences were often suspended. Authorities typically allowed officers accused of abuse to remain on duty and, in occasional cases, promoted them during their trials, which often took years.

[ . . . ]

According to the September AI report, defendants in cases that were transferred from state security courts, abolished in June 2004, to heavy penal courts often faced the same judges and prosecutors who presided over their cases when they were before the state security courts. The report also found that these judges frequently failed to investigate or take into account allegations that confessions were brought about by torture, and allegations of long periods of "unofficial" detention with no access to legal counsel. The report noted that defendants in these cases were being sentenced on the basis of evidence extracted under torture or other ill-treatment.

The TNP and Jandarma received specialized training in a number of areas, including human rights and counterterrorism. According to the government, the armed forces emphasized human rights in training for officers and noncommissioned officers.

During the first nine months of the year, 715 administrative or judicial cases were opened against security personnel and other public officials on torture, maltreatment, or excessive use of force charges. The decision of "acquittal" or "no need to punish" was reached in all 85 maltreatment or torture cases. Out of 630 "excessive use of force" cases, 10 resulted in prison sentences, one resulted in a temporary suspension, 598 resulted in acquittal or no need to punish, and 21 remained ongoing.


Funny, that part about "human rights training" for national police, jandarma, and TSK. I guess that's why they fired up all those protestors and arrested all those kids during the Amed Serhildan last March. But they were only following Erdogan's orders.

Since the 1990's and PKK's approach to women's rights and politicization of the Kurdish people, Kurdish women have been at the forefront of the women's rights movement in Turkey, something even admitted by TDN:


Comparing the numbers in any political demonstration in Turkey, women with Kurdish background immediately are noticed with their great numbers. This helps the visibility of the rallies, protests and demonstrations, as well as the demands. “Kurdish women have always been sensitive on issues of peace and every kind of violence,” said Fitnat Durmuşoğlu, from the Amargi association, a prominent women organization in the country. “They have always shown their sensitivity. They provided acceleration for the movement.”


More proof of PKK's influence on the politicization of Kurds, and Kurdish women in particular, are the number of women DTP mayors and politicians:


To find women in high ranks is pretty hard in Turkey. But the regions where they are mostly concentrated are the east and the Southeast. “They play a major role in the liberation movement of the women all around Turkey, not only in the region,” says [Pinar} Selek. “They have witnessed every hardship as a woman, but they have also suffered more because of their origin.”


Naturally, TDN fails to mention that many of those same DTP mayors have been arrested in recent days. Here's the BBC report on that:


According to one tally, more than 50 DTP members of the pro-Kurdish DTP have been arrested and at least seven senior officials charged in less than a fortnight, our correspondent says.

Party officials argue they are victims of a sustained campaign of harassment, saying the authorities are trying to close the party down before a general election later this year.


There is one bright spot on this International Women's Day, from Çemçemal in South Kurdistan. An adult education program has been set up for area women, as IWPR reports:


Until three months ago, Miryam Majeed’s early morning routine involved feeding her two children and starting on the day’s chores. But now there is a new task that gets her out of bed and fills her with enthusiasm – she has gone back to school.

Now 29, Majeed from Chamchamal, 60 kilometres south of Sulaimaniah in Iraq’s Kurdish region, never received an education as a child. "My father didn’t let me go to school", she explained.

Now she carries her books to classes four days a week, and spends several hours studying at home.

Majeed counts herself lucky that her husband has backed her in her desire to get an education.

"Illiteracy is like being blind," she said, "I always had to ask other people to read me things."


For Kurdistan, Miryam Majeed has one thing necessary to receive an education: a good husband who supports her thirst for education. Kurdish men are critical to the freedom of Kurdish women.

Kurdistan can no longer afford to keep women from education and the mentality that has forced women to remain illiterate must go. Neither is is acceptable to keep women from education by using the excuse that the education is affiliated with one party or another--and in this case, it's not. Such an excuse is just a cover for continued promotion of patriarchal attitudes. If men fear educated women, then they need to examine themselves to find and eradicate the roots of their problem.

If Kurdish men continue to repress Kurdish women, then don't let them come crying about their own repression, lack of freedom, or yearning for independence. They will not have earned it, and I don't care how many years they have spent in the mountains.

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

CENSORSHIP RUNNING AMOCK

"The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it."
~ John Gilmore.


From the Censorship Department.

Ozgur Gundem has been shut down for one month by the Turkish government:


Gundem newspaper closed for one month.

Our newspaper has been shut down for one month by 13 Felony Court from today and on because of the news published between 4 to 7 March. As employees we are condemning the shut down punishment and we are calling all people to be sensitive to this.


When Ozgur Gundem refers to "news published between 4 to 7 March" it means it is being punished for publishing news of Ocalan's poisoning and the Kurdish reaction to it. This also means that Ozgur Gundem will be shut down during Newroz.

Interesting that there were a few non-Kurd related blogs talking about Ahmet Turk's latest sentence for referring to Apo as "Sayin" or "Mister" Ocalan.

From No Right Turn:


No matter what you think of Ocalan or his cause, this is ridiculous. Calling someone "Mr" - or conversely, failing to insult them every time you mention them - should not be any sort of crime. If Turkish law allows this, then the law has to go.


Brian at Primordial Blog likens the Turkish sentencing to a Monty Python flick:


It reminds me of the old Monty Python routine from the Life of Brian. Prosecutor: He is guilty of saying "Mr. Ocalan" - Whack! (rock hits him in the head). No, I didn't say Mr. I was just telling you that he said Mr. - Whack! Whack!


At A Stitch In Haste, the question goes to free expression rights and the EU:


MY TAKE: Making it a crime to respectfully call a colleague "Mister"? Remind me again how Turkey is less Islamofascist than Saudi Arabia? In any case, a while back many noted the irony that in France it is a crime to deny the Armenian Massacre while in Turkey it's a crime to acknowledge it. And these two nations hope to share a common membership in the European Union, complete with common principles of criminal law — and expressive freedom? Yeah right, good luck with that.


Okay, technically, this isn't an Islamofascist thing; it's just your plain, garden variety fascist thing. Secular Blasphemy touches on Turkey's "democratic ideas":


Those who had doubts about Turkey's commitments to democratic ideas just had them strengthened. [ . . . ] Turkey also bans the distribution of political material in any other language than Turkish. Kurdish political writings are banned by default.


From Graham's Grumbles:


Apparently its a crime to have respect for a Kurdish freedom fighter in Turkey. I don’t remember this happening anywhere else, but then, the way things are going in Britain, it might not be longer before we’re faced with such bizarre and draconian rules too.


Oh, yeah, baby: Britain's almost there, all right. From Blue Collar Heresy:


Is this really a country the EU wants on it’s members roll? [ . . . ] Welcome to Turkish democracy…


A Scottish blog takes the wider perspective:


The BBC's Sarah Rainsford reported that more than 50 DTP members of the pro-Kurdish DTP have been arrested and at least seven senior officials charged in under a fortnight.

DTP officials argue there is a sustained campaign of harassment and that the authorities are trying to close the party down before a general election later this year.

The party is viewed by Turkish nationalists as closely tied to the Kurdish separatist cause. DTP leaders say they want an end to violent conflict and support a united Turkey.

We cant shake of the feeling that Turkey is not yet quite ready for EU membership.


And with that, welcome to our world!

A report from the AP, carried on IHT mentions harassment of DTP as well:


The Democratic Society Party was founded in 2005 by a group of Kurdish activists, several of whom had spent a decade or more in prison. Its members are frequently put on trial and the government regularly accuses them of links to the outlawed Kurdistan Workers Party, or PKK.

The party has no representation in the 550-member Turkish parliament, but dozens of mayors in the Kurdish-majority southeast are members.

[ . . . ]

Former parliament member and current DTP member Sedat Yurttas said both convictions would be appealed, and that Turk would not go immediately to prison. He said the party had come under intense pressure lately, with frequent trials and police raids on party offices.


That "intense pressure" began last year during the Amed Serhildan and it's certainly connected to this year's elections, along with a refusal by Turkish parties to lower the ridiculous 10% threshold and the monkey games played by AKP with independent candidate laws.

The second item from the Censorship Department was brought to my attention by Samarkeolog, who has a pretty complete wrap-up of Youtube's banning by a Turkish court, so give it a browse if you want links.

This censorship ruling comes down because those darned Greeks were calling Ataturk a homosexual or something, which, in turn, caused Turkish users of Youtube to reply that Greece was the birthplace of homosexuality. Well, okay, Ataturk was born there, so maybe they have a point, but generally, Turks are very sensitive about this kind of thing, or of referring to Zubeyde Hanim as wearing combat boots, or whatever.

See, in Turkey, you can't refer to Ocalan as "Mister," nor can you call Ataturk "gay." Both are big no-nos.

It didn't matter that Youtube removed the videos which purported to prove Ataturk's sexual proclivities, the Ankara regime is determined to show them what happens to those who are impertinent enough to be the vehicle of such an outrageous insult to Turkishness. Next thing you know, they'll trot out good old Article 301, ready to slap it on any Youtube employee who dares to set foot within the "territorial integrity" of the heart of Greater Turan.

Of course, as we all know, it's not possible for a Kurd to upload any video to Youtube without drawing a blue streak of Turkish invective, one after the other, in the comments section to whatever Kurdish video there happens to be. Or we have the case of Turkish hackers going through Youtube's site, deleting Kurdish accounts and deleting Kurdish videos. I'm guessing that these are the same noble defenders of Ataturk's virginity, who are upset with the Greeks.

Looking on the bright side, perhaps now peace and calm will prevail at Youtube, sans pesky ethnic Turk adolescents based within the TC.

According to a Reuters report on Yahoo, there's some noise about the ban being lifted but no specifics as to when. Australia's The Age has an interview with one of the founders of the Internet, who weighs in on the topic of Internet censorship:


As a firm believer in the freedom of speech, he said he was opposed to the idea of tighter government regulation or censorship of web-based video content.

"Any time you seek censorship you introduce a very slippery slope because then it becomes a case of who decides what's acceptable and what isn't and how far do you go in this and does it become political and does it become religious, does it become mere opinion or ... ideology," he said. And is that the kind of society we want to live in?


No, but that's the kind of society that, in Turkey's case, is normal and it seems like it's getting to be the same way everywhere else.

Lastly, but not least, the Human Rights Association (IHD), Organization for Human Rights & Solidarity for Oppressed People (MAZLUMDER), and Human Rights Foundation of Turkey (TIHV) have issued a press release calling for an investigation of Ocalan's health conditions by an impartial, independent team of medical experts:


As human rights defenders, we underline that human rights should be provided for everyone under any circumstances. Rights of life and health are the basic human rights. The recent claims regarding with Ocalan s health condition is related with right of life/health and an important issue that might cause serious social-political incidents in society.

It is definite that issue is highly important and urgent one. It is necessary that claims should be investigated in a serious manner by State s all institutions particularly the Government. The public should be informed about this issue as soon as possible. Regarding with this issue; an independent, impartial committee, which will carry out investigations and explain its results to the public should be composed.


According to Turkish media, Ocalan's lawyers are now under investigation for the poisoning claims, but if the Ankara regime were innocent, it would have immediately called for an independent medical team from an international human rights organization, to conduct a new hair sample analysis and compare it with the original analysis and they would make the results public.

Put up or shut up.

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

REACTION FROM THE STATE OF DENIAL

"Amnesty International believes that prolonged isolation including small group isolation may have serious effects on the physical and mental health of prisoners and may constitute cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. It can also facilitate torture and ill-treatment of prisoners."
~ Amnesty International.


Turkey is in denial over the European test results that indicate Ocalan is being poisoned by the TSK, from AP on the IHT:


"This is pure lies," Cicek said of the poisoning allegations at a news conference. "We have sent a three-member expert team. They are making necessary examinations. We will announce the results tomorrow or the day after."


More from the so-called Justice Minister, from the BBC:


Justice Minister Cemal Cicek has made the government's position clear. He said the claim that Mr Ocalan had been poisoned was a lie.

If Turkey had ever seen that as an option, he said, it would have happened long ago. Turkey is a state based on the rule of law, he stressed.


It's quite possible the regime did start the poisoning a long time ago with low levels of strontium and chromium in order to fake a "natural" death from bone cancer or leukemia. Such a slow poisoning would allow the Turkish government a measure of plausible deniability.

Let me also stress to the so-called Justice Minister, that it is not sufficient to send Turkish doctors to examine Ocalan or to handle new tests on hair samples. An independent, impartial, international medical team must handle this case. Given the Ankara regime's atrocious human rights record with regard to ordinary citizens and prisoners, and the fact that the regime is incapable of impartiality with regard to any subject touching on Kurds or Ocalan (Example: see Ahmet Turk's second conviction in a week's time--for refering to Ocalan as "Mr. Ocalan"), anything else is totally unacceptable.

In the meantime, there is another press release from KHRP, indicating that the EU Turkey Civic Commission (EUTCC) is demanding a full investigation over the poisoning evidence:


5 March 2007

A KHRP press release on behalf of the EU-Turkey Civic Commission

For immediate release


EUTCC Demands Full Investigation following Recent Evidence of Mistreatment of Abdullah Öcalan

The EU-Turkey Civic Commission is extremely concerned at revelations regarding the health of Abdullah Öcalan, following the recent announcement by his legal team that analysis of hair samples uncovered evidence of contamination with elevated levels of chromium and strontium. The revelations reinforce concerns at the conditions of detention of Mr Öcalan, who has been the sole inmate on İmralı Island since 1999.

In reaction to these developments, EUTCC Chairwoman Kariane Westrheim stated “I am gravely concerned at the recent news that Mr Öcalan may be suffering from contamination with toxic chemicals in prison. I call on international institutions, particularly the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT), immediately to conduct a full investigation into these revelations and to take all necessary measures to ensure Mr Öcalan’s well being. I call on Turkey to cooperate fully in any investigation and ensure that the state of health of Mr Öcalan be independently verified and monitored. I would furthermore like to remind the Turkish Government, under whose jurisdiction Mr Öcalan is incarcerated, of its obligations under international human rights treaties and conventions, as well as its obligation to meet the Copenhagen Criteria. The abuse and mistreatment of prisoners is absolutely unacceptable in a democratic society. If Turkey is found to have had a hand in the alleged poisoning of Mr Öcalan, this will have grave consequences for both its EU accession hopes and its international standing.”

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

Chairwoman, EUTCC

Kariane Westrheim
Menneskerettighetenes Plass 1
5007 Bergen
Norway
Mobile: +47 97642088
kariane.westrheim@iuh.uib.no


Secretary General, EUTCC

Jon Rud
Sierra Altea, Buzon 138
03599 Altea la Vella
Spain
Tel. +34 965846645
Mobile: +34 666360148
jONRUD@terra.es


For KHRP:

Walter Jayawardene
Resources and Communications Coordinator
Kurdish Human Rights Project
11 Guilford Street,
London, WC1N 1DH
Tel: 020 7405 3835
wjayawardene@khrp.org

Kurdish Human Rights Project is an independent, non-political human rights organisation dedicated to the promotion and protection of the human rights of all people in the Kurdish regions. It is a registered charity, founded and based in London

Monday, March 05, 2007

DOWN THE ROAD OF INEVITABILITY?

"If we make peaceful revolution impossible, we make violent revolution inevitable."
~ John F. Kennedy.


Kurdish protestors stormed a UN building in Vienna today during an IAEA meeting, from Monsters and Critics:


Kurdish protestors stormed the entrance to the United Nations Centre in Vienna Monday where the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) were holding a board meeting.

Approximately 52 members of an organization of Kurdish exiles took part in the protest to demand the release of Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) leader Abdullah Ocalan who is serving a life sentence in Turkey.

The disruption lasted for about an hour with the protestors utilizing the presence of numerous international media crews reporting on the IAEA meeting to draw attention to their cause.

The Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK), headed by Ocalan until 1999, has been fighting an armed campaign in south-eastern Turkey to create an independent Kurdish state.

Ocalan was given the death sentence in Turkey in 1999. His sentence has since been commuted to life imprisonment after Turkey abolished the death penalty in 2002.


I know what you're thinking: Those damned apocular again! Those backward Bakûrî busting into a haven of diplomacy to demand a "terrorist's" release from prison! They're an embarrassment to the cause.

If that's what you're thinking, you're wrong.

It's gone virtually unnoticed in English-language media, but there is now a serious claim that the Turkish government has been slowly poisoning Abdullah Ocalan with strontium and chromium--strontium being a radioactive metal. What could be more appropriate then than carrying out a protest in front of the IAEA? What could be more clever than taking up an hour of the international media's time to force the issue on them? I mean, now the media can't say it didn't know.

Rastî had two unusual visitors today, one from the UN in Vienna and the other from the IAEA in Vienna, and they were searching for information on Ocalan. Now they can't say that they don't know.

The rest of the Monsters and Critics article is filled with useless "filler" phrases that are meaningless in reality but by mindless repetition guarantee the spread of Ankara's propaganda:


The Kurdistan Workers' Party . . . has been fighting an armed campaign in south-eastern Turkey to create an independent Kurdish state.


Wrong. As emphasized in the Declaration last August, PKK wants a "democratic autonomy within the borders of Turkey. We believe that a solution in the unity of Turkey will be for the benefit of firstly the Kurdish people and all the people of the region." Any idiot with the ability to read can clearly see that this precludes "an independent Kurdish state."


. . . Abdullah Ocalan who is serving a life sentence in Turkey.

[ . . . ]

Ocalan was given the death sentence in Turkey in 1999. His sentence has since been commuted to life imprisonment after Turkey abolished the death penalty in 2002.


Wrong again. Ocalan is not serving a life sentence, nor has the sentence been "commuted to life imprisonment," nor has Turkey, in reality, abolished the death penalty. The Ankara regime has been carrying out its execution of the death penalty against Ocalan for some time. How long, we don't know yet. We only know that strontium levels in Ocalan's body measure 115 ng/mg, a significantly elevated level from the normal 0.6 ng/mg to 14.4 ng/mg. As previously posted, strontium is a causative of bone cancer and leukemia. Bone cancer or leukemia were the Ankara regime's chosen manner of execution, leaving no doubt that the abolishment of the death penalty in Turkey was, like all other legalistic "harmonization packages," simply a cosmetic change to law in order to uphold the pretense of democracy and the pretense of conformity to the EU accession ritual.

Do Kurds really need to be a part of an economic club that willingly plays along with a terrorist state in its mockery of what is generally defined as "democracy" or "rule of law?" Does enablement of this charade benefit the Kurdish people in any way? Do Kurds deserve nothing more than to live under a regime whose facade is more phony than any Hollywood backdrop and in which the people do nothing more than play-act the role of citizen?

Juxtaposed against this, the true nature of the Ankara regime, we have the nonsense of murderer Kenan Paşa being "investigated" for saying that Kurds should be treated as "brothers." This chief murderer of September 12, later self-appointed president of the Model of Democracy, one of Paul Henze's very own little boys, is not only responsible for the enforcement of a constitution written to protect the state from the people, but there are a number of other accomplishments that can be added to his resume, as Mehmet Altan once reminded us:


I remembered the balance sheet of that coup d’état: 650,000 people were placed in detention and tortured; 2,000,000 people were put on police files and tortured; 230,000 others were tried by state of siege emergency courts; 98,000 were hunted down for membership of some organisation and the death sentence was demanded for 7,000 people. Journalists were sentenced to a total of 3,315 years imprisonment. 14 people died as a result of the hunger strike and 171 others as a result of torture to which they had been subjected. Another 144 died in suspicious circumstances, 50 were sentenced to hanging and executed. Amongst the last was Erdal Eren, aged only 17, whose age was deliberately increased. To justify this problematic decision, Kenan Evren had declared “Do you want to hang them or feed them? (…)”

The coup d’état restored the prestige of the one party state in Turkey … it straightjacket pluralism, democracy and individual rights. Thanks to the European Union, we see, today the extent of this straightjacket.

The Secretariat of the National Security Council (MGK) recommended that the State conduct a psychological operation against its own people … And this circular has remained in force for 20 years … despite the many governments that have followed one another and all our society…


Yes, by all means, Kenan Paşa needs to be investigated--but not for his bullshit about treating Kurds like brothers. He should be investigated for bringing about a regime that now secretly poisons a prisoner in order to circumvent its own abolishment of the death penalty.

Perhaps it would not be strictly correct to say that those ordinary people who play-act at democracy should be investigated, but they certainly should have their heads examined by competent psychiatric authorities. Here I mean those who continue to believe that only through democratic means will Kurds achieve anything.

Reality check: The sole reason that Kurds under Turkish occupation can fight back today, whether politically or militarily; the sole reason that DTP politicians can send Newroz invitations in Kurdish; or install Kurdish-language software in municipality computers; or suggest that local resources be administered locally; or send letters to Danish prime ministers asking for the preservation of free speech for Kurds; or attempt to hold conferences to discuss the Kerkuk question--all of these and more--is the result of PKK's şehîds.

A murder like Kenan Paşa, and the regime he brought into being with a little help from his American and European friends, can only be countered by force of arms. This is especially true when all doors of legitimate political activity have been slammed in Kurdish faces by unseen hands, which we have seen recently in the assaults on Kurdish political leaders and intellectuals in Europe, in the banning of Ocalan's ECHR submission from the "Mother of Parliaments," in the rejection of Ocalan's retrial request, in the insistence that the refugees of Maxmur are still somehow "terrorists" despite an American raid that proved otherwise, in the outright rejection by Ankara, Washington, and Strassbourg of a ceasefire and offer of political solution to the Kurdish situation.

There is no possibility of winning at someone else's game (democracy) when you are playing with cheaters. Only fools will continue to play.

It's time to act up, just like 52 Kurds did at the IAEA meeting today. If the use of molotov cocktails and stones are necessary, then it's time to act up in that way, too, just as Kurds have done throughout Turkish-occupied Kurdistan today in Mersin, Sîrt, Şîrnex, Amed, Istanbul, and Adana. It's time to march, as Kurds have done in Berlin, Brussels, Toulouse, Mexmur, Afrin.

Everyone recognizes the complicity of Europe in the genocide of the Kurdish people, even TAK. From the hevals at KurdishInfo:


The European States, which had a important part in surrendering of leader of Kurdish People, Leader APO to fascist Turkish State as a result of inferior bargain with cooperation of colonialist and imperialist states, have shown their duplicity and unprincipled character afresh by carrying out operations on our people for few auctions when the time came. This means baseness and political depravity in all languages.

[ . . . ]

If Turkey don't give up denial-extirpation policies and European states have a part and participate in these policies, these will cause to take aim at tourists who are in Turkey and the touristic establishments. While we take aim at Turkish tourism we will take aim at tourists, especially European tourists. So we are warning right now; any tourist shouldn't come to Turkey and shouldn't arrange to come Turkey. We had said our targets and have attacked. If they come, they will our target again.


In that, you have an example of John F. Kennedy's soundbite: "If we make peaceful revolution impossible, we make violent revolution inevitable."

Of course, it's up to Turkey and the West to decide which road they want to take. The solution is really very simple.

Sunday, March 04, 2007

POISONING UPDATE

"If this [the poisoning] is true, then that would mean the state is committing a well-planned and systematic murder. We, as the DTP, believe that such an attack against Öcalan would be an attack on the domestic peace of our country. If Öcalan is really under attack by the insertion of chemical or radioactive elements into his food - something that is backed by scientific data -- we feel the consequences of this would be unimaginably heavy."
~Aysel Tugluk, DTP Co-Chair.


Developing news on the Ocalan poisoning scandal . . .

On Friday, DTP co-chairman Aysel Tugluk warned of the obvious:


“If there is a chemical attack against Ocalan, the results would be as severe as no one could guess,” Tugluk said.


As reported Saturday, Aysel Tugluk held a press conference together with IHD, TIHV, the Turkish Bar Association, and Turkish Doctor's Association on the question of Ocalan's poisoning. She called for an independent team of health professionals to investigate the poisoning claims, to compare their results to the European results, and to make the matter transparent to the public.

In Europe, Kurdish organizations are united in their protest against the poisoning, with condemnations of the Turkish civil government and military as the responsible parties for the poisoning. There are universal calls for an independent medical investigation of Ocalan and publication of the results of such an investigation. Many organizations echo Tugluk's earlier warning about severe results in the event of Ocalan's death.

YEK-KOM noted that military attacks against the Kurdish people continued in spite of the ceasefire and implied that the resort to a campaign of poisoning was a result of the Turkish government's inability to engage the Kurdish situation with anything but annihilation. The poisoning of Ocalan was an act of poisoning the entire Kurdish people.

Kurdish singers called for all people to be sensitive to the poisoning issue, called for a cure of Ocalan's health, and demanded the poisoning stop immediately.

The Kurdish Women's Peace Bureau noted that the death sentence originally imposed on Ocalan was being carried out slowly over time, and Kurdish organizations in the UK consider the poisoning to be a provocation. They also call for an independent medical team to investigate the situation at Imrali and to inform the public of all findings.

The EU's only Kurdish parliamentarian had her own comments:


EU Parliamentarian Uca: Europe must take action.
EU parliamentarian Feleknas Uca released a written statement calling upon EU states to take action: "Europe must send an independent doctors' committee to Imrali, and this is urgent." Having said that, Uca stressed that the cause of the poisoning might be revealed at the location in which it ocurred. At the same time, the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) must visit Ocalan with Uca noting the following: "European states that criticize Guantanamo risk credibility by closing their eyes to Ocalan, who is deprived of his legal rights in isolation at Imrali Island. The date of the prison's closing passed a while ago, anyway."

Uca urged the Turkish government to clear up this matter in order to prevent chaos.


Uca's comparison with Guantanamo is right on target and I would suggest another comparison, that of EU criticism of extraordinary renditions by the US. Last month, an EU Parliament report admitted that over 1200 extraordinary rendition flights had taken place in the EU--particularly in Germany, Italy, Spain, and Portugal--all with EU acquiescence, naturally. HRW suggests that sanctions should be applied to those countries that have violated human rights and compensation should be made to innocent victims of illegal American renditions. Whether the EU is serious about this, or whether this is just another public relations event remains to be seen.

The comparison with Ocalan's case is that he, too, was extraordinarily rendered by the US, Israel, and Turkey, in 1999, with the same wink-and-nod complicity of the EU. The difference is that certain EU countries are now considering legal action against certain US and EU agents.

While the EU plays along with human rights issues for the sake of appearances, the Ankara regime frankly admits that prisoners serving life sentences have don't have the same rights as other prisoners:


"Ocalan, as a prisoner serving a life sentence, does not have all rights normally extended to prisoners. He has not had any serious health problems up until today."


Which rights are denied? Since the statement is in response to a request for a proper medical evaluation, is that one of the rights denied to prisoners serving life sentences? No proper medical care? In the prison paradise of Turkey, prisoners never have any health problems--not even as a result of torture--but in Ocalan's case there have been health complaints for at least three years, since 2004. Health complaints began to resurface at the beginning of 2006.

In a statement by Murat Karayilan, KKK holds Yasar Buyukanit primarily responsible for the poisoning of Ocalan, since Imrali Island is under the control of the Turkish military. Aiding and abetting the military is the civilian political structure of Turkey, represented by Sezer, along with Erdogan's AKP and Baykal's opposition CHP. KKK also calls for demonstrations of protest in Kurdistan and Diaspora.

Demonstrations against Ocalan's poisoning took place in Europe last Thursday and Friday, especially throughout Germany, at Strassbourg and in Switzerland.

It should be an interesting election year, with the extreme level of nationalism throughout the ordinary Turkish population, with the recent crackdown on DTP politicians, with murderers like Kenan Evren and others whining about "brotherhood" or similar stupid and condescending ideas, now we have the evidence that the likes of Evren, Buyukanit, Sezer, Erdogan, and Baykal have slowly been carrying out the original sentence against Ocalan. So much for the cosmetic change to Turkish law that abolished the death penalty. Just as the bright boys in Ankara thought the 1999 capture of Ocalan was the end of Kurdish resistance, so they must think that their application of the death penalty now will be the final blow to Kurds. They are wrong twice.

Poisoning-related or not? TAK has issued a travel advisory for the 2007 tourism season.

This might be a good year to visit The Bahamas instead of Turkey.

Thursday, March 01, 2007

A LITTLE CASE OF POISONING

"On the 23rd of November 2006 Alexander Litvinenko died due to suspected deliberate poisoning with polonium-210."
~ Wikipedia, Radiation Poisoning.


First of all, I mentioned earlier that when more news surrounding the banning of a discussion of Ocalan's book from the House of Commons was available, I would write something. Well, today, Mark Thomas let the cat out of the bag, from the New Statesman:


Now consider this. The Welsh Plaid Cymru MP Elfyn Llwyd was to host a book launch in Parliament on 20 February. The book, "Prison Writings: The roots of civilisation", is published by Pluto Press and is written by Abdullah Ocalan, and the book was Ocalan’s submission to the European Court of Human Rights.

The invites were sent, the room was organised, when out of the blue the Serjeant at Arms office phoned Mr. Llwyd’s office saying that the book launch shouldn’t go ahead as the Foreign and Commonwealth Office had sent a letter to him informing him that Mr. Ocalan was a terrorist and muttering about how it could be "glorifying acts of terrorism". So it was that the FCO managed to cancel a Parliamentary launch of a legal submission to the European Court of Human Rights. All of which seems a little, well, nuts really. You can’t beat terrorism by banning book launches.


Much more at the link, so please peruse.

Basically, what happened was the UK's Foreign Ministry--the equivalent of the US State Department--threatened a member of Parliament with the "glorification of terror" clause of the UK's current anti-terror law in order to silence a discussion of Ocalan's submission to the ECHR. So, if a member of Parliament is threatened into silence by the British government, it's probably a hell of a lot worse for the average Joe or Jane on the street. For all practical purposes, this means the the freedom of expression is dead in the UK, thanks to the Blair government, which also happens to be Turkey's strongest backer for EU accession. EU accession, as has been preached to us endlessly, is supposed to be the only chance for Kurds to gain any measure of "democracy"--whatever definition that word is supposed to have given the circumstances surrounding this scandal.

Right. I know I believe them.

Second item: It would appear that the Ankara regime has been slowly poisoning the Prisoner of Imrali with radioactive materials, specifically strontium. According to an analysis of Ocalan's hair samples, results show that the level of strontium in Ocalan's body measures 115 ng/mg. Normal levels are between 0.6 - 14.4 ng/mg.

According to a statement on the analysis by a Professor of Medicine and registered toxicologist in Norway:


Bone marrow effects are the most serious immediate consequences of exposure to high levels of radioactive strontium. Depending on the dose incorporation into bone may result in hypoplasia of the haematopoietic tissue and pancytopenia, i.e. anemia, immune system depression and depression of blood platelets, the latter resulting in bleeding tendency. The severity will depend on the dose. At lower doses white blood cells will occur with weakened immune functions as a result.

Internally deposited radionuclides, such as radioactive strontium, is classified as carcinogenic to humans by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Long term exposure and effects relate to radiation induced cancer in tissues adjacent to bone and haematopoietic cells in bone marrow are especially vulnerable with increased risk of leukaemia. The risk is dependent on the actual radiation dose.


More, from the Nuclear Energy Institute:


The chemical toxicity of the stable isotopes of strontium is considered to be quite low. Strontium poisoning is rare and in most instances accidental. Current interest in the toxicity of strontium is related to the radioactive isotope, Sr-90, which is present in radioactive fallout as a fission product, remains available for an extended period because of its 28.1-year half-life, and has been implicated as a causative agent in bone cancer and leukemia.


In fact, most of the discussion in the NEI document has to do with strontium poisoning as a result of radioactive fallout. When did Imrali Island end up downwind of an atomic blast?

The good news is that KHRP has taken up the issue:


Kurdish Human Rights Project

Telephone Walter Jayawardene, Resources and Communications Coordinator at +44 (0) 207 405 3835



1 March 2007
Press Release: For immediate release



KHRP Calls for Investigation after Fresh Evidence Raises Concern for Health of Abdullah Öcalan


According to information recently provided to the Kurdish Human Rights Project Legal Team, a hair sample of Abdullah Öcalan's has recently been obtained through covert means which (because of a need to protect the source), the KHRP Legal Team is not at this stage at liberty to disclose.

The samples have been submitted for testing and according to a report from a leading European professor of pharmacology and senior public health official “the [body sample] analysed has elevated levels of chromium (moderately elevated) and of strontium (markedly elevated)”.

Although the professor identifies some uncertainty because the amount of sample was small, he expresses the conclusion that “it seems very likely that the subject from whom the…sample originates has been exposed to a high dose of strontium acutely and/or chronically”.

These matters clearly require further investigation but given their potential importance to Mr Öcalan's health, the KHRP Legal Team has considered that it is appropriate to draw them to the attention of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (the CPT) at the first opportunity. The KHRP has in the past argued that it would be appropriate for Mr Öcalan to have access to independent medical advice and this latest information only underscores the merit of such a course in order to provide some certainty as to the position.

The CPT has visited Imrali Island in the past to monitor Mr Öcalan's conditions of detention and has made a series of recommendations for the improvement of his conditions.

The KHRP Legal Team has also drawn its concerns to the European Court of Human Rights in the context of Mr Öcalan's ongoing complaint that his conditions of detention violate Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.



FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

Kurdish Human Rights Project
11 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1DH
Tel: 020 7405 3835
khrp@khrp.org www.khrp.org


Given its many successes at the ECHR, it is an extremely important move that KHRP has called for further investigation. Such an investigation must be carried out by a neutral party.

Never happy with having to do away with the death penalty, has the Ankara regime been carrying out its own, unique form of capital punishment, slowly and over a period of eight years now? Was the Ankara regime going to make it look like death by leukemia or bone cancer? Isn't a slow death the kind that the regime promised? Ocalan's lawyers are being diplomatic in their statement:


We, as the lawyers of Mr Ocalan, have grave concerns over the results of the samples which were taken under extremely difficult conditions. As yet, we do not have any knowledge as to what the source of these elements which are at an alarming level stem from, for what period these have existed at this level and what effects it has had on our client. However we do believe that our client’s life is under a serious and a grave risk. We do believe that the scientific results at hand are enough to allege this. Under the present circumstances we are only able to shed light onto this dimension of the truth. It is utterly important that the results attained be investigated by an independent and international delegation of experts and a new analysis should be held under better conditions so that the situation can be completely clarified. However, we do insist that such an investigation must be held immediately and urgently.


I, on the other hand, am no diplomat. The Ankara regime is fully responsible for everything that happens to its prisoners, and at this moment, in this case, it looks like they have been purposely poisoning Ocalan in order to bring about a death that would appear innocuous.

This is the same regime that is directly responsible for the murder of 40,000 Kurds in the last decade. What's one more?


As a reminder, Ocalan is not the only prisoner to be abused by the Turkish system.

Many thanks to the heval who alerted me to these new developments. I guess that's the advantage when you live several time zones ahead--you get to see all the news first.