Sunday, April 02, 2006


"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed the subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty." ~ Adolf Hitler.

One little item almost slipped through the cracks due to the news of protests coming from Turkish-occupied Kurdistan in the last few days. It can be found at NTV MSNBC, and another can be found on The New Anatolian.

Apparently, the Turkish state, specifically the Interior Ministry and the so-called Justice Ministry, are attempting to find a way to bury Kurdish gerîlas in the field, instead of returning them to their families for proper burial. Once we get over flashbacks of the mass graves that have been found in Turkish-occupied Kurdistan in the last few years, which have yielded bodies of gerîlas or of those disappeared during the dirty war, we will see that there is another reason for the state's seeking to refuse to return any future bodies: torture, mutilation, and extrajudicial murder.

There were indications that the bodies of the Dargeçit şehîds had been tortured or mutilated after death, or both. There were also indications of execution-style murders of at least one of these şehîds. The same appears to have happened with at least some of the bodies of the Muş şehîds.

It is reasonable to expect that if gerîlas are buried in the field by the enemy, torture, mutilation, extrajudicial murder and even the use of chemical weapons, will be actions committed with impunity by Turkish security forces. The EU will not see, the families will not see and no one will know about the serious human rights violations that the security forces will be able to engage in freely, without fear of censure or prosecution. How convenient for the Turkish state.

It is clear to me that this kind of maneuvering by the Turkish state is consistent with its founding ideology, which is truly fascist in nature. As proof of my assertion of the fascist nature of Turkish state ideology, the following are fourteen common and defining characteristics of fascist regimes, taken from an article at the Council for Secular Humanism:

1. Powerful and continuing expressions of nationalism. From the prominent displays of flags and bunting to the ubiquitous lapel pins, the fervor to show patriotic nationalism, both on the part of the regime itself and of citizens caught up in its frenzy, was always obvious. Catchy slogans, pride in the military, and demands for unity were common themes in expressing this nationalism. It was usually coupled with a suspicion of things foreign that often bordered on xenophobia.

2. Disdain for the importance of human rights. The regimes themselves viewed human rights as of little value and a hindrance to realizing the objectives of the ruling elite. Through clever use of propaganda, the population was brought to accept these human rights abuses by marginalizing, even demonizing, those being targeted. When abuse was egregious, the tactic was to use secrecy, denial, and disinformation.

3. Identification of enemies/scapegoats as a unifying cause. The most significant common thread among these regimes was the use of scapegoating as a means to divert the people’s attention from other problems, to shift blame for failures, and to channel frustration in controlled directions. The methods of choice—relentless propaganda and disinformation—were usually effective. Often the regimes would incite “spontaneous” acts against the target scapegoats, usually communists, socialists, liberals, Jews, ethnic and racial minorities, traditional national enemies, members of other religions, secularists, homosexuals, and “terrorists.” Active opponents of these regimes were inevitably labeled as terrorists and dealt with accordingly.

4. The supremacy of the military/avid militarism. Ruling elites always identified closely with the military and the industrial infrastructure that supported it. A disproportionate share of national resources was allocated to the military, even when domestic needs were acute. The military was seen as an expression of nationalism, and was used whenever possible to assert national goals, intimidate other nations, and increase the power and prestige of the ruling elite.

5. Rampant sexism. Beyond the simple fact that the political elite and the national culture were male-dominated, these regimes inevitably viewed women as second-class citizens. They were adamantly anti-abortion and also homophobic. These attitudes were usually codified in Draconian laws that enjoyed strong support by the orthodox religion of the country, thus lending the regime cover for its abuses.

6. A controlled mass media. Under some of the regimes, the mass media were under strict direct control and could be relied upon never to stray from the party line. Other regimes exercised more subtle power to ensure media orthodoxy. Methods included the control of licensing and access to resources, economic pressure, appeals to patriotism, and implied threats. The leaders of the mass media were often politically compatible with the power elite. The result was usually success in keeping the general public unaware of the regimes’ excesses.

7. Obsession with national security. Inevitably, a national security apparatus was under direct control of the ruling elite. It was usually an instrument of oppression, operating in secret and beyond any constraints. Its actions were justified under the rubric of protecting “national security,” and questioning its activities was portrayed as unpatriotic or even treasonous.

8. Religion and ruling elite tied together. Unlike communist regimes, the fascist and protofascist regimes were never proclaimed as godless by their opponents. In fact, most of the regimes attached themselves to the predominant religion of the country and chose to portray themselves as militant defenders of that religion. The fact that the ruling elite’s behavior was incompatible with the precepts of the religion was generally swept under the rug. Propaganda kept up the illusion that the ruling elites were defenders of the faith and opponents of the “godless.” A perception was manufactured that opposing the power elite was tantamount to an attack on religion.

9. Power of corporations protected. Although the personal life of ordinary citizens was under strict control, the ability of large corporations to operate in relative freedom was not compromised. The ruling elite saw the corporate structure as a way to not only ensure military production (in developed states), but also as an additional means of social control. Members of the economic elite were often pampered by the political elite to ensure a continued mutuality of interests, especially in the repression of “have-not” citizens.

10. Power of labor suppressed or eliminated. Since organized labor was seen as the one power center that could challenge the political hegemony of the ruling elite and its corporate allies, it was inevitably crushed or made powerless. The poor formed an underclass, viewed with suspicion or outright contempt. Under some regimes, being poor was considered akin to a vice.

11. Disdain and suppression of intellectuals and the arts. Intellectuals and the inherent freedom of ideas and expression associated with them were anathema to these regimes. Intellectual and academic freedom were considered subversive to national security and the patriotic ideal. Universities were tightly controlled; politically unreliable faculty harassed or eliminated. Unorthodox ideas or expressions of dissent were strongly attacked, silenced, or crushed. To these regimes, art and literature should serve the national interest or they had no right to exist.

12. Obsession with crime and punishment. Most of these regimes maintained Draconian systems of criminal justice with huge prison populations. The police were often glorified and had almost unchecked power, leading to rampant abuse. “Normal” and political crime were often merged into trumped-up criminal charges and sometimes used against political opponents of the regime. Fear, and hatred, of criminals or “traitors” was often promoted among the population as an excuse for more police power.

13. Rampant cronyism and corruption. Those in business circles and close to the power elite often used their position to enrich themselves. This corruption worked both ways; the power elite would receive financial gifts and property from the economic elite, who in turn would gain the benefit of government favoritism. Members of the power elite were in a position to obtain vast wealth from other sources as well: for example, by stealing national resources. With the national security apparatus under control and the media muzzled, this corruption was largely unconstrained and not well understood by the general population.

14. Fraudulent elections. Elections in the form of plebiscites or public opinion polls were usually bogus. When actual elections with candidates were held, they would usually be perverted by the power elite to get the desired result. Common methods included maintaining control of the election machinery, intimidating and disenfranchising opposition voters, destroying or disallowing legal votes, and, as a last resort, turning to a judiciary beholden to the power elite.

These characteristics were determined after making a study of seven fascist regimes. I will leave it to you, dear Rastî reader, to determine how many of these characteristics fit the Turkish regime. I am not the first to make this comparison, and there is an excellent discussion of the subject by John Tirman, author of Spoils of War. Some of you may remember that the Turkish publisher of Spoils of War was charged last year by Turkish prosecutors under Article 301 of the Turkish penal code.

(Note: That MIT is not the same as the MIT.)

One last item provides more fuel for the fascist fire, and that is an article from TDN, discussing the question of Turkey's Special Warfare Department, a question that has always been taboo. Give it a read with Semdinli in mind.

Better yet, give it a read with the Wan prosecutor's accusations against Buyukanit Pasha in mind.


Anonymous said...

Hello Mizgin. I greatly enjoy reading your posts. I am trying to learn more about this Special Warfare Department. The link you provided indicates it has something to do with the Cyprus peace intervention. Can you provide more info about the activities of this department in regards to cyprus or the Kurds?

Anonymous said...

Keep up the work!

I just want to say that the servers that is hosted on have been under DDoS attacks from Turkey since 2 days. The servers we're on are pretty good and have held back all DDoS attacks, until 2 days ago. It's a proof that this issue is EXTRA sensitive for the Turkish government.

So is down until further notice. Several friends all over the world has offered to mirror, so we may come up sooner than the Turkish government anticipated.

Keep on blogging on this, don't let it go away!



Mizgîn said...

Heval, if this issue is so EXTRA sensitive to Enqere, then we have to make sure we get the word out!

If you need anything, let me know. My blog is your blog for as long as you need it.

I am not going away. Rastî is not going away. The Kurdish people under Turkish occupation are not going away and their story is not going away.

Serkeftin, bira!

Mizgîn said...

Anan, the Cyprus "peace intervention" is known by everyone else on earth as the invasion of North Cyprus. This particular piece of news that you refer to is significant in that the existence of the Special Warfare Department has not been acknowledged before by the Turkish government, just as until a few months ago, the existence of Yesil aka Mahmut Yildirim aka Ahmet Demir, a notorious assassin of the government, had never been acknowledged.

As a result of the secrecy surrounding this organization, it is difficult to find much information on its activities. You might try these:

I also posted information about Ozel Tim (Special Teams) in the post below this one, and you can check the references there.

Note that this organization changed its name several times during the Cold War. You may want to Google "Ozel Harp Dairesi," acronym "OHD" (Special Warfare Department) and "Ozel Kuvvetler Komutanligi," acronym "OKK" (Special Forces Command). The latter was the later name change of the same organization, i.e. Special Warfare Department = Special Forces Command.

Anonymous said...

Mizgîn, I am trying to learn more about Turkey and her neighbors. Here in the states, America views Turkey as a loyal ally. Recently though, some in the states, particularly from the conservatives feel that Turkey has not been a loyal ally in helping with Iraq and Israel and are starting to question the partnership. As we see from your blog, there are two sides to every story. Keep us informed on the events in Turkey; you are doing a great job.

Anonymous said...

Turkey has become the most prominent non-French back-stabbing country on the planet.